ssage --
From: Zefram via RT
Date: Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #73752] Wrong unshared memory values when
using /proc/self/statm
To:
Queue: Apache-SizeLimit
Ticket https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=73752 >
The problem is that the "
Who do I ask for permission to close rt.cpan.org tickets? #77129
should now be resolved but I don't have perms to mark it as resolved
myself.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional comman
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Christian Ruppert via RT"
Date: Jan 4, 2012 5:09 PM
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #73752] Wrong unshared memory values when using
/proc/self/statm
To:
Wed Jan 04 20:09:34 2012: Request 73752 was acted upon.
Transaction: Ticket created by idl0r
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #68233] mod_perl not install with perl 5.14
To:
Mon May 16 10:15:53 2011: Request 68233 was acted upon.
Transaction: Ticket created by kolpak
Queue: mod_perl
Subject: mod_perl not install with perl 5.14
Broken in: 1.31
Severity: Important
Owner: Nobody
On Friday, March 25, 2011 17:58:26 Fred Moyer wrote:
> -if (eval { require Linux::Smaps } && Linux::Smaps->new($$)) {
> +if (eval { require Linux::Smaps && Linux::Smaps->new($$) }) {
+1
Torsten Förtsch
--
Need professional modperl support? Hire me! (http://foertsch.name)
Like f
On Mar 25, 2011, at 5:58 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Christian Ruppert via RT
> Date: Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:46 AM
> Subject: [rt.cpan.org #66894] Apache::SizeLimit: Linux::Smaps detection broken
> To:
>
>
> Fri Mar 25 12:46:38
-- Forwarded message --
From: Christian Ruppert via RT
Date: Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:46 AM
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #66894] Apache::SizeLimit: Linux::Smaps detection broken
To:
Fri Mar 25 12:46:38 2011: Request 66894 was acted upon.
Transaction: Ticket created by idl0r
Queue
Cc'ing the ticket so Dave can join in the list discussion.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dave Mitchell via RT
Date: Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #64999] AutoReply: GvCV and GvGP lvalue
changes in perl core
To:
Queue: mod_perl
Ticket
On Friday, January 21, 2011 17:38:48 Fred Moyer wrote:
>#ifndef GvCV_set
># define GvCV_set(gv,cv) (GvGP(gv)->gp_cv = (cv))
>#endif
>#ifndef GvGP_set
># define GvGP_set(gv,gp) ((gv)->sv_u.svu_gp = (gp))
>#endif
probably better:
# define GvCV_set(gv, cv) (GvCV(gv)=(cv
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dave Mitchell via RT
Date: Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:37 AM
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #64999] GvCV and GvGP lvalue changes in perl core
To:
Fri Jan 21 11:37:33 2011: Request 64999 was acted upon.
Transaction: Ticket created by [email protected]
Queue
I unsubscribed the rt queue from this newsletter. Looks like they
purchased a list somewhere that harvested the email from CPAN - odd.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chitika, Inc. via RT
Date: Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:29 PM
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #62182] [Chitika Newsletter] Mobile
Looks like we need another release, this went uncaught.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Max Kanat-Alexander via RT
Date: Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:21 PM
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #61622]
To:
Fri Sep 24 20:21:31 2010: Request 61622 was acted upon.
Transaction: Ticket created by MKANAT
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
wrote:
> On 4/17/2010 5:24 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
>> One other issue occurred to me; TAP::Harness will now be a dependency.
>>
>> What are people's thoughts on that? TAP::Harness is included in 5.12,
>> but not 5.10. Test::Harness is bundled wit
On 4/17/2010 5:24 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
> One other issue occurred to me; TAP::Harness will now be a dependency.
>
> What are people's thoughts on that? TAP::Harness is included in 5.12,
> but not 5.10. Test::Harness is bundled with earlier versions of perl.
> We use Test::Harness extensively i
One other issue occurred to me; TAP::Harness will now be a dependency.
What are people's thoughts on that? TAP::Harness is included in 5.12,
but not 5.10. Test::Harness is bundled with earlier versions of perl.
We use Test::Harness extensively in Apache::Test, so this would be
switching part of
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
wrote:
> I forget where off the top of my head, but A-T has a function to search
> $PATH for binaries.
Apache::TestConfig::which('binary');
And aptly named, thanks for the spot on my previous hack. I'm not
sure how to test this specifically, s
On 4/15/2010 10:08 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
RT: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32993
Please take a look at this revised patch here and give a +1, 0, or -1. Thanks!
Index: lib/Apache/TestHarnessPHP.pm
===
--- lib/Apache
RT: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32993
Please take a look at this revised patch here and give a +1, 0, or -1. Thanks!
Index: lib/Apache/TestHarnessPHP.pm
===
--- lib/Apache/TestHarnessPHP.pm(revision 934663
Any other thoughts on this from the dev list (Adam commented on this
thread already)? Here's a copy of the diff again. This was marked as
a critical bug for Apache::Test, but I moved it to wishlist (since it
is an enhancement).
There are currently 4 open RT tickets for Apache::Test, this is one
Fred Moyer wrote:
Fred Moyer wrote:
Configuring Apache::Test is not easy (drawing from my own personal
experiences and comments on RT tickets, etc), so I think that making
some changes like this so that it 'just works' in more situations is a
prudent move. We don't want A::T to become bloated
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Adam Prime wrote:
> Fred Moyer wrote:
>>
>> This seems like a reasonable request. I know there are a few times
>> that I had to put the apreq module load in extra.conf.in, and it would
>> have been nice to have things magically 'just work'. I only have one
>> mod
Fred Moyer wrote:
This seems like a reasonable request. I know there are a few times
that I had to put the apreq module load in extra.conf.in, and it would
have been nice to have things magically 'just work'. I only have one
modperl application that does not use libapreq, and I think that I
wou
This seems like a reasonable request. I know there are a few times
that I had to put the apreq module load in extra.conf.in, and it would
have been nice to have things magically 'just work'. I only have one
modperl application that does not use libapreq, and I think that I
wouldn't mind the extra
either.
>
> Adam
>
> Fred Moyer wrote:
>>
>> Not quite sure how to resolve this and keep the links on perl.apache.org
>> working
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Slaven_Rezic via RT
>> Date: Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:35 AM
&g
e.org working
-- Forwarded message --
From: Slaven_Rezic via RT
Date: Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:35 AM
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #44703] Wrong links in documentation
To:
Tue Mar 31 11:35:05 2009: Request 44703 was acted upon.
Transaction: Ticket created by SREZIC
Queue: mod_perl
Subject: W
Not quite sure how to resolve this and keep the links on perl.apache.org working
-- Forwarded message --
From: Slaven_Rezic via RT
Date: Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:35 AM
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #44703] Wrong links in documentation
To:
Tue Mar 31 11:35:05 2009: Request 44703 was acted
erity: (no value)
Owner: Nobody
Requestors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: new
Ticket http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40058 >
My understanding was that mod_perl-1.99 was considered mod_perl2.
Thanks for the help!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -q -a | grep -i mod_perl
Fred Moyer wrote:
I've been in a tuit deficit lately so I can't look at this soon.
Well, after about a decade of time, I've finally gotten a FreeBSD ports
commit bit. Thats what been eating nearly all my time for the last 1.5
years.
I should be able to split my time more 50/50 in the near fu
I've been in a tuit deficit lately so I can't look at this soon.
--- Begin Message ---
Queue: Apache-Test
Ticket http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=12911 >
Refreshing the ticket. Behavior is still present in 1.30.
Please break the potentially endless loop. I don'
Geoffrey Young wrote:
APR::Date::parse_rfc does not accept a date of the form:
seems like this should be an [EMAIL PROTECTED] bug for apr not mod_perl to me,
unless we do something wierd with the XS.
--
Philip M. Gollucc
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #37592]
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:15:12 -0400
From: Doug via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thu Jul 10 12:15:09 2008: Request 37592 wa
Reviewed, tested, and committed.
r661903
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #36305] Overridden get_basic_credentials broken w/
NTLM Authentication
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 13:43:17 -0400
From: RFRANKEL via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To:
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #36305] Overridden get_basic_credentials broken w/
NTLM Authentication
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 13:43:17 -0400
From: RFRANKEL via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
References: &
So I finally got my 'write' permissions back! WEE
After my triage, I've managed to fix/close/ask for feed back to about 10
PRs.
That leaves us with this.
NEWOPENSTALLED
Apache-DBI 1 1 1
Apache-Reload 1
don't know if that solves one problem and creates another :)
--
Red Hot Penguin Consulting LLC
mod_perl/PostgreSQL consulting and implementation
http://www.redhotpenguin.com/
--- Begin Message ---
Queue: Apache-Reload
Ticket http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=34316 >
Ab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred Moyer wrote:
| Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| I haven't run into a situation where I have needed to use it myself,
| just have had to install it because something else has needed it. Maybe
| I'm ignorant of the
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=32992
Any thoughts on adding version.pm as a new depency ?
I've never had a good handle on why this module is needed, but it seems
like it makes $VERSION just work a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=1566
Randyk, windows people thoughts ?
- --
-
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
o:703.549.2050x206
Senior System Admin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=32992
Any thoughts on adding version.pm as a new depency ?
It probably doesn't quite work as expected with '<'
- --
- ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay, So I'm logged in as pgollucci
It says I'm a maintainer, but I can only reply to bugs?
Whats next ?
- --
-
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
o:703.549.2050x206
Senio
stems, LLC.
Personal : [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wiles.org
Work : [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.revsys.com
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:00:47 -0500
Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Original Message ----
> Subject: [rt.cpan.org #33475]
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #33765] Fix for 5.10
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:10:56 -0500
From: Reini Urban via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Mar
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #33765] Fix for 5.10
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:10:56 -0500
From: Reini Urban via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Mar 02 20:10:54 2008: Reque
Fred Moyer wrote:
Sat Feb 16 11:11:48 2008: Request 33303 was acted upon.
Transaction: Ticket created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROBLEM:
If I turn off USE_SMAPS (i.e. set Apache::SizeLimit::USE_SMAPS=0), I get
an
error, specifically:
Here is my suggested set of patches to fix these issues, with an
>> Sat Feb 16 11:11:48 2008: Request 33303 was acted upon.
>> Transaction: Ticket created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> PROBLEM:
>> If I turn off USE_SMAPS (i.e. set Apache::SizeLimit::USE_SMAPS=0), I get
>> an
>> error, specifically:
> Here is my suggested set of patches to fix these issues, with an
> a
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #33475] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#466734:
libapache-db-perl: FTBFS with Perl 5.10]
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:00:05 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Refe
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #33471] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#466738:
libb-size-perl: FTBFS with Perl 5.10]
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:13:38 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Refe
> Sat Feb 16 11:11:48 2008: Request 33303 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PROBLEM:
> If I turn off USE_SMAPS (i.e. set Apache::SizeLimit::USE_SMAPS=0), I get
> an
> error, specifically:
I just tested this out on my Centos 5.0 platform and it looks like
Apache::
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #33303] Bug in Apache::SizeLimit
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:11:50 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PRO
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #32486] ModPerl::MM: no include path for apr.h
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:08:48 -0500
From: Malcolm J Harwood via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Geoffrey Young wrote:
> so, I've been thinking a bit about this and I think I recall the
> original reasoning way back when...
>
> my $obj = $class->new();
> $r->pnotes(OBJ => $obj);
>
> I am almost certain that this was the original use case for pnotes as I
> dig into my mind and recall th
-cases of the
dot-com era :)
--Geoff
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #30061] $r->pnotes stores aliases not copies so is
subject to action at a distance
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:31:51 -0500
From: Tim_Bunce via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclo
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #30300] breakage on perl built with
-Duserelocateableinc
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:27:17 -0400
From: Andreas Koenig via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> Torsten Foertsch wrote:
>> On Wednesday 17 October 2007 18:10, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
>>> Yeah, I know. If you ask me, this pnotes behaviour is wrong, but we chose
>>> to keep it around for historical reasons. It's not a bug if it's documented
>> It is a bug. If it i
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 October 2007 18:10, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
>> Yeah, I know. If you ask me, this pnotes behaviour is wrong, but we chose
>> to keep it around for historical reasons. It's not a bug if it's documented
>
> It is a bug. If it is documented it is a docum
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 18:10, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> Yeah, I know. If you ask me, this pnotes behaviour is wrong, but we chose
> to keep it around for historical reasons. It's not a bug if it's documented
It is a bug. If it is documented it is a documented bug. I was hit by it once
a
Geoffrey Young wrote:
> heh, didn't this just come up?
It sure did!
> gozer: I did find the documentation, and I posted it to the rt ticket.
I knew it existed somewhere, thanks.
> I guess we don't have a historical way of managing rt tickets, but I'm
> tempted to resolve this one as "rejected"
7;t a pleasant one ;)
--Geoff
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #30061] $r->pnotes stores aliases not copies so is
subject to action at a distance
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:58:22 -0400
From: Tim_Bunce via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undis
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #25506] Failed "make test" in 2.0.3 at
t/apache/util.t and t/api/server_const.t
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 02:31:16 -0400
From: via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
References: &
D]> wrote:
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: [rt.cpan.org #18584] Apache::DProf not taint safe
> Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 06:14:01 -0400 (EDT)
> From: via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> References:
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #18584] Apache::DProf not taint safe
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 06:14:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fri Apr 07 06:14:00 2
maxrss is in KB, but ixrss is not
ApacheSizelimit incurrectly assumes ixrss to be in KB
Geoff, I thought I responded to the RT today.
From my FreeBSD 6.0 - Release man pages GETRUSAGE(2)
ru_ixrss an ``integral'' value indicating the amount of memory used
by the text segment th
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #18230] Apache::SizeLimit (shared mem pages) broken
for bsd systems
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 10:46:46 -0500 (EST)
From: Guest via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
References: <[EMAIL
Geoffrey Young wrote:
> FYI
Resolved in change 385693.
Philippe M. Chiasson m/gozer\@(apache|cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/ GPG KeyID : 88C3A5A5
http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/ F9BF E0C2 480E 7680 1AE5 3631 CB32 A107 88C3A5A5
FYI
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #18140] Syntax error with mod_perl and mod_rewrite,
Apache::Registry
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 07:06:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Guest via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
References: &
65 matches
Mail list logo
