On 2010-04-03, at 11:32 PM, Jan Dubois wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Apr 2010, Randy Kobes wrote:
>> On 2010-04-03, at 8:39 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>>
>>> What ANSI C std is that?
>>>
>>> perl core code and fbsd code do this all over the place. They are
>>> supposedly C-99.
>>
>>> On 4/2/2010 4:4
On Friday 02 April 2010 22:40:43 Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> In ANSI C you can't define variables in blocks, like
>
> int foo(void) {
> int a = 2;
> some code
> {
> int b = 3;
> more code
> }
>
Although I am sure that ANSI C does allow for that I committed your version.
K&R C di
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010, Randy Kobes wrote:
> On 2010-04-03, at 8:39 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>
> > What ANSI C std is that?
> >
> > perl core code and fbsd code do this all over the place. They are
> > supposedly C-99.
>
> > On 4/2/2010 4:40 PM, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> >>
> >> In ANSI C
On 2010-04-03, at 8:39 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> What ANSI C std is that?
>
> perl core code and fbsd code do this all over the place. They are
> supposedly C-99.
> On 4/2/2010 4:40 PM, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
>>
>> In ANSI C you can't define variables in blocks, like
>>
>> int foo(
What ANSI C std is that?
perl core code and fbsd code do this all over the place. They are
supposedly C-99.
On 4/2/2010 4:40 PM, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> On 10-03-31 11:07 , Torsten Förtsch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the patch below simplifies mod_perl.c a bit.
>>
>> Instead of
>>
>> modperl_re
On 10-03-31 11:07 , Torsten Förtsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the patch below simplifies mod_perl.c a bit.
>
> Instead of
>
> modperl_response_handler_run(r, finish) {
> do something
> if( finish ) {
> modperl_response_finish()
> }
> }
>
> and calling that function in one place as
>
> modperl
+1
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Randy Kobes wrote:
> +1.
>
> --
> best regards,
> Randy
>
> On 2010-04-02, at 1:03 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On 03/31/10 15:07, Torsten Förtsch wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the patch below simplifies mod_perl.c a bit.
>>>
>>> Instead of
>>>
>>> modp
+1.
--
best regards,
Randy
On 2010-04-02, at 1:03 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> +1
>
> On 03/31/10 15:07, Torsten Förtsch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the patch below simplifies mod_perl.c a bit.
>>
>> Instead of
>>
>> modperl_response_handler_run(r, finish) {
>> do something
>> if( finish ) {
+1
On 03/31/10 15:07, Torsten Förtsch wrote:
Hi,
the patch below simplifies mod_perl.c a bit.
Instead of
modperl_response_handler_run(r, finish) {
do something
if( finish ) {
modperl_response_finish()
}
}
and calling that function in one place as
modperl_response_handler_run(r
Hi,
the patch below simplifies mod_perl.c a bit.
Instead of
modperl_response_handler_run(r, finish) {
do something
if( finish ) {
modperl_response_finish()
}
}
and calling that function in one place as
modperl_response_handler_run(r, TRUE)
and in the second place as
modperl_respons
10 matches
Mail list logo
