[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3176) Rows will be skipped which are having future timestamp in row_timestamp column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418185#comment-15418185 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3176: --- Looks like the RENEW_LEASE feature is impacting this. If

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3178) Row count incorrect for UPSERT SELECT when auto commit is false

James Taylor created PHOENIX-3178: - Summary: Row count incorrect for UPSERT SELECT when auto commit is false Key: PHOENIX-3178 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3178 Project: Phoenix

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3036) Modify phoenix IT tests to extend BaseHBaseManagedTimeTableReuseIT

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418139#comment-15418139 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3036: - Github user samarthjain commented on a diff in the

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3036) Modify phoenix IT tests to extend BaseHBaseManagedTimeTableReuseIT

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418140#comment-15418140 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3036: - Github user samarthjain commented on a diff in the

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #189: PHOENIX-3036 Modify phoenix IT tests to extend Ba...

Github user samarthjain commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/189#discussion_r74523807 --- Diff: phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/end2end/SkipScanQueryIT.java --- @@ -246,15 +248,15 @@ public void testVarCharXIntInQuery() throws

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #189: PHOENIX-3036 Modify phoenix IT tests to extend Ba...

Github user samarthjain commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/189#discussion_r74523759 --- Diff: phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/end2end/SkipScanQueryIT.java --- @@ -111,10 +113,10 @@ private void

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3036) Modify phoenix IT tests to extend BaseHBaseManagedTimeTableReuseIT

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418117#comment-15418117 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3036: - Github user JamesRTaylor commented on the issue:

[GitHub] phoenix issue #189: PHOENIX-3036 Modify phoenix IT tests to extend BaseHBase...

Github user JamesRTaylor commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/189 Is this ready to go, @prakul & @samarthjain? Sounds like there are just a few minor issues turned up by Samarth. Let's get this committed to 4.x ASAP, please. --- If your project is set up

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-3176) Rows will be skipped which are having future timestamp in row_timestamp column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418114#comment-15418114 ] Samarth Jain edited comment on PHOENIX-3176 at 8/11/16 11:27 PM: - Wrote

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3176) Rows will be skipped which are having future timestamp in row_timestamp column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418114#comment-15418114 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3176: --- Wrote a test with ROW_TIMESTAMP column following

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3072) Deadlock on region opening with secondary index recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418049#comment-15418049 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3072: --- I'm confused by this, [~enis]. On the RS, we already make

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3072) Deadlock on region opening with secondary index recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418050#comment-15418050 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3072: --- I'm confused by this, [~enis]. On the RS, we already make

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3176) Rows will be skipped which are having future timestamp in row_timestamp column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417896#comment-15417896 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3176: --- Those UpsertSelectIT test supply a CURRENT_SCN. We need

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3176) Rows will be skipped which are having future timestamp in row_timestamp column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417888#comment-15417888 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3176: --- We have tests that do UPSERT SELECT with row_timestamp.

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3176) Rows will be skipped which are having future timestamp in row_timestamp column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417879#comment-15417879 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3176: --- We may need to advise against forward dating rows using

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3176) Rows will be skipped which are having future timestamp in row_timestamp column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417866#comment-15417866 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3176: --- It's important to run the scan as of the time stamp from

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3176) Rows will be skipped which are having future timestamp in row_timestamp column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417815#comment-15417815 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3176: --- Patch looks good to me, [~an...@apache.org].

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3165) System table integrity check and repair tool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417802#comment-15417802 ] Andrew Purtell commented on PHOENIX-3165: - bq. For SYSTEM.SEQUENCE corruption, we're in a

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-3165) System table integrity check and repair tool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417792#comment-15417792 ] Andrew Purtell edited comment on PHOENIX-3165 at 8/11/16 7:27 PM: -- bq.

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3165) System table integrity check and repair tool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417792#comment-15417792 ] Andrew Purtell commented on PHOENIX-3165: - bq. Unfortunately, that's not possible across all the

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1119) Use Zipkin to visualize Phoenix metrics data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nishani updated PHOENIX-1119: -- Attachment: spans.png dependency.png callcount.png

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3036) Modify phoenix IT tests to extend BaseHBaseManagedTimeTableReuseIT

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417761#comment-15417761 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3036: - Github user prakul commented on a diff in the pull

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #189: PHOENIX-3036 Modify phoenix IT tests to extend Ba...

Github user prakul commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/189#discussion_r74483839 --- Diff: phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/end2end/HashJoinMoreIT.java --- @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ import com.google.common.collect.Maps;

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3165) System table integrity check and repair tool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417753#comment-15417753 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3165: --- I agree that mucking with the system catalog in the HBase

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2336) Queries with small case column-names return empty result-set when working with Spark Datasource Plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417740#comment-15417740 ] Josh Mahonin commented on PHOENIX-2336: --- Hi [~kalyanhadoop] That github commit looks good. Can

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3123) Document new local index implementation and upgrade steps

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417516#comment-15417516 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3123: --- Thanks for the doc updates, [~rajeshbabu]. The release

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3163) Split during global index creation may cause ERROR 201 error.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417500#comment-15417500 ] Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-3163: {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3163) Split during global index creation may cause ERROR 201 error.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla updated PHOENIX-3163: - Attachment: PHOENIX-3163_v3.patch Here is the patch what I was telling.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-3163) Split during global index creation may cause ERROR 201 error.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417355#comment-15417355 ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla edited comment on PHOENIX-3163 at 8/11/16 2:45 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3163) Split during global index creation may cause ERROR 201 error.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417352#comment-15417352 ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla commented on PHOENIX-3163: -- For non aggregate queries on local

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3171) Update release notes for known issue PHOENIX-3164 in 4.8

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417341#comment-15417341 ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla commented on PHOENIX-3171: -- Added the release notes as part of

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3123) Document new local index implementation and upgrade steps

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla updated PHOENIX-3123: - Attachment: PHOENIX-3123_v2.patch Added the required documentation and

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3123) Document new local index implementation and upgrade steps

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla updated PHOENIX-3123: - Attachment: (was: PHOENIX-3123.patch) > Document new local index

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3123) Document new local index implementation and upgrade steps

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla updated PHOENIX-3123: - Attachment: PHOENIX-3123.patch > Document new local index

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3123) Document new local index implementation and upgrade steps

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla updated PHOENIX-3123: - Attachment: PHOENIX-3123.patch > Document new local index

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3123) Document new local index implementation and upgrade steps

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla updated PHOENIX-3123: - Attachment: (was: PHOENIX-3123.patch) > Document new local index

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3123) Document new local index implementation and upgrade steps

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla updated PHOENIX-3123: - Attachment: PHOENIX-3123.patch [~jamestaylor] Please review. >

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3176) Rows will be skipped which are having future timestamp in row_timestamp column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-3176: --- Attachment: (was: PHOENIX-3176.patch) > Rows will be skipped which are having future

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3176) Rows will be skipped which are having future timestamp in row_timestamp column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-3176: --- Attachment: PHOENIX-3176.patch > Rows will be skipped which are having future timestamp in

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3176) Rows will be skipped which are having future timestamp in row_timestamp column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-3176: --- Attachment: PHOENIX-3176.patch [~samarthjain], when SCN is not set and no row_timestamp

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3176) Rows will be skipped which are having future timestamp in row_timestamp column

Ankit Singhal created PHOENIX-3176: -- Summary: Rows will be skipped which are having future timestamp in row_timestamp column Key: PHOENIX-3176 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3176

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2336) Queries with small case column-names return empty result-set when working with Spark Datasource Plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417025#comment-15417025 ] Kalyan commented on PHOENIX-2336: - Hi Josh Mahonin, same patch is going to work for PHOENIX-2336,

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-541) Make mutable batch size bytes-based instead of row-based

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15416922#comment-15416922 ] Saurabh Seth commented on PHOENIX-541: -- If no one has started working on this maybe I can take this

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-2821) Document Offset and Fetch SQL construct

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal resolved PHOENIX-2821. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.8.0 > Document Offset and Fetch SQL construct

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2821) Document Offset and Fetch SQL construct

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15416693#comment-15416693 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2821: --- +1. Thanks for the updates! > Document Offset and Fetch

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2821) Document Offset and Fetch SQL construct

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-2821: --- Attachment: PHOENIX-2821_v3.patch Sorry about that, last diff was just taken from publish

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3128) Remove extraneous operations during upsert with local immutable index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15416686#comment-15416686 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3128: --- There are Gets done on the server side to lookup the

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2821) Document Offset and Fetch SQL construct

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15416683#comment-15416683 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2821: --- I'm not seeing any .md or site.xml in the patch. Maybe

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2821) Document Offset and Fetch SQL construct

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15416673#comment-15416673 ] Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-2821: bq. let's move this page back to the Features menu

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2821) Document Offset and Fetch SQL construct

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-2821: --- Attachment: PHOENIX-2821_v2.patch > Document Offset and Fetch SQL construct >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Josh Elser joins Phoenix PMC

Congratulations Josh!!! On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > Thank you all! I look forward to working more closely with everyone :D > > > James Taylor wrote: > >> On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm pleased to announce that Josh >> Elser has accepted