+1 to drop 1.0 support. What about 1.1? Do we need that given we have 1.2
support?
On Sunday, August 21, 2016, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> +1 to drop support for EOL 1.0
>
>
> > On Aug 20, 2016, at 6:12 PM, > <
> la...@apache.org > wrote:
> >
> > The HBase 1.0.x branch has been EOL'd, I propose we d
Hi James,
Thanks a lot for the slides, I studied it in the weekends, and I was starting
to understand the internals. But I still have some questions on the
organization of the data.
Since the data table has 3 rows :
| ROW | FAMILY | QUALIFIER | TS | VALUE |
|--| -
Hi James,
Thanks a lot for the slides, I studied it in the weekends, and I was starting
to understand the internals. But I still have some questions on the
organization of the data.
Since the data table has 3 rows :
| ROW | FAMILY | QUALIFIER | TS | VALUE |
|-| --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
prakul agarwal reassigned PHOENIX-3181:
---
Assignee: prakul agarwal
> Run test methods in parallel to reduce test suite run ti
+1 to drop support for EOL 1.0
> On Aug 20, 2016, at 6:12 PM, wrote:
>
> The HBase 1.0.x branch has been EOL'd, I propose we drop support for it with
> Phoenix 4.9.I'd also propose that should HBase have a stable 1.3.x release
> soon, we should support it with Phoenix 4.9.
> -- Lars
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Josh Elser updated PHOENIX-2036:
Fix Version/s: 4.5.0
> PhoenixConfigurationUtil should provide a pre-normalize table name to
> Ph
I'm +1 on both points. I don't know that 1.3 will be available in time
though...
On Saturday, August 20, 2016, wrote:
> The HBase 1.0.x branch has been EOL'd, I propose we drop support for it
> with Phoenix 4.9.I'd also propose that should HBase have a stable 1.3.x
> release soon, we should supp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15429714#comment-15429714
]
Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-2161:
You need hbase.rpc.timeout at the clien
