[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15817308#comment-15817308
]
Lars Hofhansl edited comment on PHOENIX-3560 at 1/11/17 6:03 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814497#comment-15814497
]
Lars Hofhansl edited comment on PHOENIX-3560 at 1/11/17 6:03 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15806107#comment-15806107
]
Lars Hofhansl edited comment on PHOENIX-3560 at 1/11/17 6:03 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15817308#comment-15817308
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3560:
The FirstKeyOnlyFilter would still work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva updated PHOENIX-3560:
Assignee: Samarth Jain (was: Thomas D'Silva)
> Aggregate query performance is worse with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15816963#comment-15816963
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-3584:
-
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Phoenix-master #
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15816912#comment-15816912
]
Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3560:
---
[~mujtabachohan], it would be interesting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15816914#comment-15816914
]
Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3560:
---
[~mujtabachohan], it would be interesting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15816901#comment-15816901
]
Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3560:
---
We use a SINGLE_KEYVALUE_COLUMN_QUALIFIER
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Samarth Jain resolved PHOENIX-3584.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.10.0
4.9.1
> Expose metrics for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15816786#comment-15816786
]
Maryann Xue commented on PHOENIX-3579:
--
Thank you, [~kliew], for the update! You ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15816756#comment-15816756
]
chenzhiming commented on PHOENIX-3555:
--
Thanks,get it!
> Building async local inde
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maryann Xue resolved PHOENIX-3581.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Class-cast exceptions caused by TestUtil.getSplits() and
> TestUtil.getGu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva updated PHOENIX-3519:
Summary: Add COLUMN_ENCODED_BYTES table property (was: Specify
QualifierEncodingScheme in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva reassigned PHOENIX-3586:
---
Assignee: Thomas D'Silva
> Add StorageScheme table property to allow users to speci
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva updated PHOENIX-3519:
Attachment: PHOENIX-3519.patch
[~jamestaylor]
Can you please review? I had to make the fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15816520#comment-15816520
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3584:
---
+1. Looks good, [~samarthjain].
> Expose
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Samarth Jain updated PHOENIX-3584:
--
Attachment: PHOENIX-3584.patch
Patch that adds two new global metrics for HConnections and
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva updated PHOENIX-3586:
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Task)
Parent: PHOENIX-2565
> Add StorageScheme table p
Thomas D'Silva created PHOENIX-3586:
---
Summary: Add StorageScheme table property to allow users to
specify their custom storage schemes
Key: PHOENIX-3586
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3586
Thomas D'Silva created PHOENIX-3585:
---
Summary: MutableIndexIT testSplitDuringIndexScan and
testIndexHalfStoreFileReader fail for transactional tables and local indexes
Key: PHOENIX-3585
URL: https://issues.apach
The Phoenix Tuning Guide has been through several reviews and revisions.
The latest version is attached to PHOENIX-3218:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3218
Please take a look and comment with any final feedback.
Thanks,
Peter
Peter Conrad
Lead Technical Writer: Infrastructu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Conrad updated PHOENIX-3218:
--
Attachment: Phoenix-Tuning-Guide-20170110.md
Made significant format edits, cleaned up a few
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15816002#comment-15816002
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3572:
-
GitHub user bijugs opened a pull requ
GitHub user bijugs opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/229
PHOENIX-3572 Support FETCH NEXT|n ROWS query on cursor
Refer PR #192 for earlier discussion on cursor implementation. As mentioned
in the title, this PR implements a sub set of ``cursor`` feature ta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15815937#comment-15815937
]
Andrew Purtell edited comment on PHOENIX-3584 at 1/10/17 7:35 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15815942#comment-15815942
]
Andrew Purtell edited comment on PHOENIX-3584 at 1/10/17 7:33 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15815942#comment-15815942
]
Andrew Purtell commented on PHOENIX-3584:
-
Personally I think we need to track a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15815937#comment-15815937
]
Andrew Purtell commented on PHOENIX-3584:
-
[~lhofhansl] points out we also need
Nicolas,
FYI, the description provided by Thomas is how we support Argus[1] on top
of Phoenix. This Phoenix-based time series implementation will be open
sourced soon in Argus. In our performance measurements[2], we've found
Phoenix to be on par or faster than OpenTSDB with approximately the same
a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15815802#comment-15815802
]
Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3584:
---
On it.
> Expose metrics for ConnectionQu
Nicolas,
If you want to implement the OpenTSDB datamodel you can define a base table
and define views for each metric. For example the base table DDL could be
CREATE SEQUENCE metric_id_seq CACHE 100
CREATE TABLE metric_table
(
metricid INTEGER NOT NULL,
eventTime TIMESTAMP NOT NULL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15815634#comment-15815634
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3584:
---
[~samarthjain] - we're seeing many zookee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-3584:
--
Assignee: Samarth Jain
> Expose metrics for ConnectionQueryServices instances and their alloca
Andrew Purtell created PHOENIX-3584:
---
Summary: Expose metrics for ConnectionQueryServices instances and
their allocators in the JVM
Key: PHOENIX-3584
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3584
Because no one has implemented it. It would be a welcome addition and
probably not too difficult.
Thanks,
James
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 7:00 AM 程磊 wrote:
> Hi,when I read the following code in OrderBy.complie method, in line
> 160,it seems that SkipScanFilter can not support
> OrderBy.REV_ROW_K
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15815332#comment-15815332
]
Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla commented on PHOENIX-3579:
--
As part of PHOENIX-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15815317#comment-15815317
]
Kevin Liew commented on PHOENIX-3579:
-
Hi [~maryannxue], the test cases did fail on
Hi,when I read the following code in OrderBy.complie method, in line 160,it
seems that SkipScanFilter can not support OrderBy.REV_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY,
SkipScanFilter still could not support OrderBy.REV_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY now? and
why? :
155 if (isInRowKeyOrder && tracker.isOrderPreserving()) {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15815040#comment-15815040
]
Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-3555:
-
No worries! Just doing some cleanup :)
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814968#comment-15814968
]
Josh Mahonin commented on PHOENIX-3214:
---
Hi [~kalyanhadoop] this is definitely on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-3523:
---
Attachment: PHOENIX-3523_wip.patch
parking a wip patch here .. it fixes the above issue. But
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ankit Singhal reassigned PHOENIX-3523:
--
Assignee: Ankit Singhal
> Secondary index on case sensitive table breaks all queries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-3572:
---
Assignee: Biju Nair
> Support FETCH NEXT| n ROWS from Cursor
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814812#comment-15814812
]
Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-3572:
I have already reviewed it offline, [~j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814579#comment-15814579
]
Venkata Mohan commented on PHOENIX-3112:
I am also encountering the same issue.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814561#comment-15814561
]
Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-3582:
For test #1,
It could be possible if va
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814517#comment-15814517
]
Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-3271:
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the res
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-3560:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: I think , if we set this to _1(greater than _0 EMPTY_COLUMN_NAME)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814497#comment-15814497
]
Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-3560:
I think , if we set this to _1(greater
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814499#comment-15814499
]
Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-3560:
I think , if we set this to _1(greater
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-3271:
---
Attachment: (was: PHOENIX-3271_v3.patch)
> Distribute UPSERT SELECT across cluster
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-3271:
---
Attachment: PHOENIX-3271_v3.patch
> Distribute UPSERT SELECT across cluster
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814313#comment-15814313
]
Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-3271:
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the res
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814278#comment-15814278
]
Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-3271:
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the res
55 matches
Mail list logo
