[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16210564#comment-16210564
]
Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-4292:
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16210494#comment-16210494
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4292:
---
+1. Nice work, [~tdsilva].
> Filters on Tables and Views
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16210483#comment-16210483
]
Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-4280:
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva updated PHOENIX-4292:
Attachment: PHOENIX-4292.patch
[~jamestaylor]
I thinks its a different issue. The test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16210440#comment-16210440
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4292:
---
Do you think this is a duplicate of PHOENIX-3383? I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva updated PHOENIX-4292:
Summary: Filters on Tables and Views with composite PK of VARCHAR fields
with sort
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva updated PHOENIX-4292:
Fix Version/s: 4.13.0
> Filters on Tables and Views with composite PK of VARCHAR fields
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4280:
--
Attachment: PHOENIX-4280_v6.patch
> Delete doesn't work when immutable indexes are in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4280:
--
Attachment: PHOENIX-4280_v5.patch
> Delete doesn't work when immutable indexes are in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16210378#comment-16210378
]
Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-4242:
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16210376#comment-16210376
]
Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-4298:
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16210369#comment-16210369
]
Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-4280:
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4280:
--
Attachment: PHOENIX-4280_v4.patch
Attaching new version for test run. Will still clean up a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16210259#comment-16210259
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4300:
---
No, no dependencies on HBase 2.0 features.
> Do not use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16210234#comment-16210234
]
Geoffrey Jacoby commented on PHOENIX-4300:
--
[~jamestaylor] - would this depend on any new HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4100:
--
Description:
There's a lot of code for mutable secondary indexes, a lot of which is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4100:
--
Labels: HBase-2.0 (was: )
> Simplify mutable secondary index implementation
>
FYI, I filed JIRAs for the Phoenix changes we talked about in the
spreadsheet and labeled them all with HBase-2.0 [1].
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20PHOENIX%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20labels%3D%22HBase-2.0%22
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 3:38 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4297:
--
Labels: HBase-2.0 (was: )
> Remove deprecated API umbrella
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4298:
--
Labels: HBase-2.0 (was: )
> refactoring to avoid using deprecated API for Put/Delete
>
James Taylor created PHOENIX-4301:
-
Summary: Use operation.setPriority() instead of having our own
PhoenixRpcSchedulerFactory
Key: PHOENIX-4301
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4301
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
>
> On 10/18/17 2:51 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>
>> Hopefully, Phoenix will not find itself in a position where
>>>
>> business-critical things it's doing are being removed from API (and
>> Phoenix
>> has no recourse to hack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4300:
--
Description:
Instead of using Increment on the client and preIncrementAfterRowLock on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4300:
--
Description: Instead of using Increment on the client and
> Do not use
James Taylor created PHOENIX-4300:
-
Summary: Do not use preIncrementAfterRowLock for UPSERT VALUES ON
DUPLICATE KEY statement
Key: PHOENIX-4300
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4300
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vincent Poon updated PHOENIX-4242:
--
Attachment: PHOENIX-4242.v4.master.patch
[~giacomotaylor] version that just handles NPE and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sergey Soldatov updated PHOENIX-4298:
-
Attachment: PHOENIX-4298.patch
Changes:
Put.add => Put.addColumn
Delete.deleteColumn =>
Mujtaba Chohan created PHOENIX-4299:
---
Summary: Local index - Data vs index row count does not match
Key: PHOENIX-4299
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4299
Project: Phoenix
Sergey Soldatov created PHOENIX-4298:
Summary: refactoring to avoid using deprecated API for Put/Delete
Key: PHOENIX-4298
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4298
Project: Phoenix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sergey Soldatov updated PHOENIX-4297:
-
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> Remove deprecated API umbrella
>
Sergey Soldatov created PHOENIX-4297:
Summary: Remove deprecated API umbrella
Key: PHOENIX-4297
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4297
Project: Phoenix
Issue Type: Bug
Just a guess. Date is storying as the regular timestamp in GMT. So Phoenix
shows you the GMT time while Spark is convert GMT time to you local time
zone.
Thanks,
Sergey
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Pavani Addanki
wrote:
> I am trying to insert phoenix data into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16209866#comment-16209866
]
Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-4280:
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16209858#comment-16209858
]
Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-4287:
---
Looks like it is limited to local indexes. Will keep
On 10/18/17 2:51 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
Hopefully, Phoenix will not find itself in a position where
business-critical things it's doing are being removed from API (and Phoenix
has no recourse to hack what it needs back in place).
I feel fairly confident this is going to happen given the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16209815#comment-16209815
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-4294:
-
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Phoenix-master #1842 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16209816#comment-16209816
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-4295:
-
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Phoenix-master #1842 (See
> Hopefully, Phoenix will not find itself in a position where
business-critical things it's doing are being removed from API (and Phoenix
has no recourse to hack what it needs back in place).
I feel fairly confident this is going to happen given the radical excision
of methods from the
Yes, the earlier the better, but this is also a bit chicken-and-egg.
It's tough down in Phoenix to make sure it still works if the API we're
trying to write against is still changing.
I know that Anoop from the HBase side has been peering into the Phoenix
side -- I've been operating under the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4280:
--
Attachment: PHOENIX-4280_v3.patch
Still need to clean this up a bit, but there are a number
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16209696#comment-16209696
]
Thomas D'Silva commented on PHOENIX-4292:
-
Sure.
> SOQL Filters on Tables and Views with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16209676#comment-16209676
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-4237:
-
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on the issue:
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/275
Looking very good. Couple minor nits and the testing needs to be rounded
out just a bit.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16209673#comment-16209673
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-4237:
-
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/275#discussion_r145475530
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/phoenix/expression/function/CollationKeyFunctionTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/275#discussion_r145475423
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/phoenix/expression/function/CollationKeyFunctionTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ *
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16209670#comment-16209670
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-4237:
-
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/275#discussion_r145474350
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/expression/function/CollationKeyFunction.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/275#discussion_r145473757
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/expression/function/CollationKeyFunction.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16209669#comment-16209669
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-4237:
-
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16209667#comment-16209667
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-4237:
-
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/275#discussion_r145473581
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/expression/function/CollationKeyFunction.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor resolved PHOENIX-4294.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.13.0
> Allow scalar function to declare that it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor resolved PHOENIX-4295.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.13.0
> Fix argument order for StatsCollectorIT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dumindu Buddhika reassigned PHOENIX-4167:
-
Assignee: Dumindu Buddhika
> Phoenix SELECT query returns duplicate data in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16209010#comment-16209010
]
Chen Feng commented on PHOENIX-4296:
For example, if there are 3001 rows, whose ids are [1, 2, 3,
rukawakang created PHOENIX-4296:
---
Summary: Dead loop in HBase reverse scan when amount of scan data
is greater than SCAN_RESULT_CHUNK_SIZE
Key: PHOENIX-4296
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4296
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16208915#comment-16208915
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4280:
---
You're right, [~tdsilva]. Let me look at this closer. We
58 matches
Mail list logo