Switched PreCommit-Admin over to Apache Yetus

2018-01-16 Thread Allen Wittenauer
bcc: bui...@apache.org, d...@hbase.apache.org, d...@hive.apache.org, common-...@hadoop.apache.org, dev@phoenix.apache.org, d...@oozie.apache.org (These are all of the projects that had pending issues. This is not all of the groups that actually rely upon this code...) The recen

UDF for lateral views

2018-01-16 Thread Krishna
I would like to convert a column of ARRAY data-type such that each element of the array is returned as a row. Hive supports it via Lateral Views ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+LateralView )? Does UDF framework in Phoenix allow for building such functions?

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

2018-01-16 Thread Vincent Poon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328118#comment-16328118 ] Vincent Poon commented on PHOENIX-4531: --- [~jamestaylor] Can you review the fix?  I

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

2018-01-16 Thread Vincent Poon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vincent Poon updated PHOENIX-4531: -- Attachment: PHOENIX-4531.v1.master.patch > Delete on a table with a global mutable index can i

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

2018-01-16 Thread Vincent Poon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328086#comment-16328086 ] Vincent Poon commented on PHOENIX-4531: --- This is something more general.  I just p

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.13.2 for CDH 5.11.2 RC0

2018-01-16 Thread Pedro Boado
This vote is now closed and passes with 3 binding +1 votes and no -1 or +0 votes. Thanks everyone. On 16 January 2018 at 23:17, Flavio Pompermaier wrote: > +1 on my side. Activated parcel in Cloudera 5.11.2, enabled namespaces and > successfully runned a bulk loading yarn job (parquet-thrift

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

2018-01-16 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328060#comment-16328060 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4531: --- Is this specifically when an index is get

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

2018-01-16 Thread Vincent Poon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328053#comment-16328053 ] Vincent Poon commented on PHOENIX-4531: --- [~jamestaylor] attached a test "testIndex

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

2018-01-16 Thread Vincent Poon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vincent Poon updated PHOENIX-4531: -- Attachment: PartialIndexRebuilderIT.java > Delete on a table with a global mutable index can i

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

2018-01-16 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328049#comment-16328049 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4531: --- Note too, that the client must be on 4.13

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

2018-01-16 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328040#comment-16328040 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4531: --- Are you sure this is the case, [~vincentp

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

2018-01-16 Thread Vincent Poon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328032#comment-16328032 ] Vincent Poon commented on PHOENIX-4531: --- This is also problematic because the dele

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4530) Do not collect delete markers during major compaction of table with disabled mutable indexes

2018-01-16 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328027#comment-16328027 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4530: --- FYI, [~vincentpoon] & [~lhofhansl]. > Do

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4530) Do not collect delete markers during major compaction of table with disabled mutable indexes

2018-01-16 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4530: -- Environment:(was: If major compaction occurs on a table with mutable indexes that have the

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

2018-01-16 Thread Vincent Poon (JIRA)
Vincent Poon created PHOENIX-4531: - Summary: Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index Key: PHOENIX-4531 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4530) Do not collect delete markers during major compaction of table with disabled mutable indexes

2018-01-16 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4530: -- Description: If major compaction occurs on a table with mutable indexes that have the INDEX_D

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-4530) Do not collect delete markers during major compaction of table with disabled mutable indexes

2018-01-16 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
James Taylor created PHOENIX-4530: - Summary: Do not collect delete markers during major compaction of table with disabled mutable indexes Key: PHOENIX-4530 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4530

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.13.2 for CDH 5.11.2 RC0

2018-01-16 Thread Flavio Pompermaier
+1 on my side. Activated parcel in Cloudera 5.11.2, enabled namespaces and successfully runned a bulk loading yarn job (parquet-thrift to phoenix salted table) On 2018-01-13 12:30, Pedro Boado wrote: > Hello Everyone,> > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.13.2 for CDH 5.11.2 RC0. Thi

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.13.2 for CDH 5.11.2 RC0

2018-01-16 Thread James Taylor
+1. All unit tests pass successfully. On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Mujtaba Chohan wrote: > +1. Ran tests and verified signatures. > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Samarth Jain wrote: > > > +1. Ran unit tests successfully. Executed some manual tests around > > secondary indexes and sta

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4528) PhoenixAccessController checks permissions only at table level when creating views

2018-01-16 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16327862#comment-16327862 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-4528: - Github user twdsilva commented on a d

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #289: PHOENIX-4528 PhoenixAccessController checks permi...

2018-01-16 Thread twdsilva
Github user twdsilva commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/289#discussion_r161893623 --- Diff: phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/end2end/ChangePermissionsIT.java --- @@ -267,4 +267,26 @@ public void testMultiTenantTables() throws

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.13.2 for CDH 5.11.2 RC0

2018-01-16 Thread Mujtaba Chohan
+1. Ran tests and verified signatures. On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Samarth Jain wrote: > +1. Ran unit tests successfully. Executed some manual tests around > secondary indexes and stats collection - looks fine. > > On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Pedro Boado > wrote: > > > Hello Everyone

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.13.2 for CDH 5.11.2 RC0

2018-01-16 Thread Samarth Jain
+1. Ran unit tests successfully. Executed some manual tests around secondary indexes and stats collection - looks fine. On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Pedro Boado wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.13.2 for CDH 5.11.2 RC0. This > is > a first release of

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1556) Base hash versus sort merge join decision on how much data will be scanned

2018-01-16 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-1556: -- Description: At compile time, we know how many guideposts (i.e. how many bytes) will be scann