[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacob Isaac updated PHOENIX-6118:
-
Parent: PHOENIX-6406
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement)
> Multi Tenant Workloads
Jacob Isaac created PHOENIX-6406:
Summary: PHERF Improvements
Key: PHOENIX-6406
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6406
Project: Phoenix
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Ve
> To further complicate matters, we may have similar incompatibilities
> between Hadoop 3.0 and 3.1, as I have seen similar errors when building
> Phoenix with Hadoop 3.1
This is unfortunate. Anyone know of Hadoop releasing plans for 3.0.x?
Perhaps you can ignore it and go straight to 3.1.x. And p
chrajeshbabu closed pull request #89:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix-omid/pull/89
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Istvan Toth resolved OMID-167.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.0.3
Resolution: Duplicate
OMID-198 has a complete fix for this issue with dynamic
stoty commented on pull request #74:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix-omid/pull/74#issuecomment-792790258
Closing this as we have a fix for the root cause with dynamic port
allocation.
This is an automated message from
Hi Anoop,
Better to change in Phoenix irrespective of HBase dependency as you
mentioned set small only when really meeting small scan requirement.
Usually when ever new HBase release someone take a lead and try to change
to latest version. But now just we need to add a profile with the newer
vers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla resolved OMID-198.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Pushed to master. Thanks for review [~stoty].
> Replace static
This bug is fixed now. But how often will we change the HBase client
version in Phoenix pom? Will it be better to have a mitigation in Phoenix
code also. Simple change in ScanUtil.java to have a isSmall() true check
before calling
newScan.setSmall(scan.isSmall());
This will create a big perf is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Istvan Toth reassigned PHOENIX-6398:
Assignee: Cong Luo
> Returns uniform SQL dialect in calcite for the PQS
> --
Hi Jacob !
Yes, It looks like PHOENIX-6144
You can try using phoenix-core instead.
For 5.x, I plan to explore building a phoenix-client variant that can use
external shaded hadoop-client and hbase-client JARs,
I'm not sure if have the same protobuf client version problem in 4.x.
Istvan
On Thu,
11 matches
Mail list logo