[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-7398) New PhoenixStatement API to return row for Atomic/Conditional Upserts

2024-08-29 Thread Viraj Jasani (Jira)
Viraj Jasani created PHOENIX-7398: - Summary: New PhoenixStatement API to return row for Atomic/Conditional Upserts Key: PHOENIX-7398 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7398 Project: Ph

[jira] [Assigned] (PHOENIX-7398) New PhoenixStatement API to return row for Atomic/Conditional Upserts

2024-08-29 Thread Viraj Jasani (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Viraj Jasani reassigned PHOENIX-7398: - Assignee: Viraj Jasani > New PhoenixStatement API to return row for Atomic/Conditional

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-7395) Metadata Cache metrics at server and client side

2024-08-29 Thread Viraj Jasani (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Viraj Jasani updated PHOENIX-7395: -- Description: Phoenix maintains cache of PTable objects, also known as Metadata cache (as a G

[jira] [Assigned] (PHOENIX-7395) Metadata Cache metrics at server and client side

2024-08-29 Thread Viraj Jasani (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Viraj Jasani reassigned PHOENIX-7395: - Assignee: Jing Yu > Metadata Cache metrics at server and client side > ---

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-7386) Override UPDATE_CACHE_FREQUENCY if table has disabled indexes

2024-08-29 Thread Viraj Jasani (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Viraj Jasani updated PHOENIX-7386: -- Fix Version/s: 5.1.4 > Override UPDATE_CACHE_FREQUENCY if table has disabled indexes > --

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 5.2.1 release

2024-08-29 Thread Viraj Jasani
Two of the important fixes are merged today so now we are good to start with 5.2.1 release. As Istvan also encouraged, please help with 5.2.1 release preparation. On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:00 PM Istvan Toth wrote: > +1 on the release. > > While I would not exactly LIKE to be RM, I may be able

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-7394) MaxPhoenixColumnSizeExceededException should not print rowkey

2024-08-29 Thread Viraj Jasani (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Viraj Jasani resolved PHOENIX-7394. --- Resolution: Fixed > MaxPhoenixColumnSizeExceededException should not print rowkey > ---

[jira] [Assigned] (PHOENIX-7397) Optimize ClientAggregatePlan/ClientScanPlan when inner query is UnionPlan

2024-08-29 Thread chenglei (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei reassigned PHOENIX-7397: - Assignee: chenglei > Optimize ClientAggregatePlan/ClientScanPlan when inner query is UnionPlan

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-7397) Optimize ClientAggregatePlan/ClientScanPlan when inner query is UnionPlan

2024-08-29 Thread chenglei (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-7397: -- Summary: Optimize ClientAggregatePlan/ClientScanPlan when inner query is UnionPlan (was: Optimize Cl

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-7397) Optimize ClientAggregatePlan/ClientScanPlan when inner query plan is UnionPlan

2024-08-29 Thread chenglei (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-7397: -- Description: A common use case of union all is to union multiple homogeneous tables and then further

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-7397) Optimize ClientAggregatePlan/ClientScanPlan when inner query plan is UnionPlan

2024-08-29 Thread chenglei (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-7397: -- Description: A common use case of union all is to union multiple homogeneous tables and then further

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-7397) Optimize ClientAggregatePlan/ClientScanPlan when inner query plan is UnionPlan

2024-08-29 Thread chenglei (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-7397: -- Description: A common use case of union all is to union multiple homogeneous tables and then further

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-7397) Optimize ClientAggregatePlan/ClientScanPlan when inner query plan is UnionPlan

2024-08-29 Thread chenglei (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-7397: -- Description: A common use case of union all is to union multiple homogeneous tables and then further

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-7397) Optimize ClientAggregatePlan/ClientScanPlan when inner query plan is UnionPlan

2024-08-29 Thread chenglei (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-7397: -- Description: A common use case of union all is to union multiple homogeneous tables and then further

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-7393) Update transitive dependency of woodstox-core to 5.4.0

2024-08-29 Thread Viraj Jasani (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Viraj Jasani resolved PHOENIX-7393. --- Resolution: Fixed > Update transitive dependency of woodstox-core to 5.4.0 > --

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-7393) Update transitive dependency of woodstox-core to 5.4.0

2024-08-29 Thread Viraj Jasani (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Viraj Jasani updated PHOENIX-7393: -- Fix Version/s: 5.2.1 5.3.0 5.1.4 > Update transitive de

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-7397) Optimize ClientAggregatePlan/ClientScanPlan when inner query plan is UnionPlan

2024-08-29 Thread chenglei (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-7397: -- Description: A common use case of union all is to union multiple homogeneous tables and then further

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-7397) Optimize ClientAggregatePlan/ClientScanPlan when inner query plan is UnionPlan

2024-08-29 Thread chenglei (Jira)
chenglei created PHOENIX-7397: - Summary: Optimize ClientAggregatePlan/ClientScanPlan when inner query plan is UnionPlan Key: PHOENIX-7397 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7397 Project: P

[jira] [Assigned] (PHOENIX-7343) Support for complex types in CDC

2024-08-29 Thread Hari Krishna Dara (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Krishna Dara reassigned PHOENIX-7343: -- Assignee: Hari Krishna Dara > Support for complex types in CDC > ---

Re: [DISCUSS] phoenix-spark connector

2024-08-29 Thread Istvan Toth
On second thought that makes sense, we didn't touch the V1 driver when porting to Spark3. Your suggestion sounds good. On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 11:53 AM Rejeb Ben Rejeb wrote: > Yes, it's correct. > > Le jeu. 29 août 2024 à 11:12, Istvan Toth a > écrit : > > > So the V1 code in Spark 3 still be

Re: [DISCUSS] phoenix-spark connector

2024-08-29 Thread Rejeb Ben Rejeb
Yes, it's correct. Le jeu. 29 août 2024 à 11:12, Istvan Toth a écrit : > So the V1 code in Spark 3 still behaves as Spark2 does, which is different > from the V2 in Spark3. > Do I understand correctly ? > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 10:28 AM Rejeb Ben Rejeb > wrote: > > > Sorry, I explained it ba

Re: [DISCUSS] phoenix-spark connector

2024-08-29 Thread Istvan Toth
So the V1 code in Spark 3 still behaves as Spark2 does, which is different from the V2 in Spark3. Do I understand correctly ? On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 10:28 AM Rejeb Ben Rejeb wrote: > Sorry, I explained it badly, I meant spark3 will support both Append and > Overwrite mode and both will behave t

Re: [DISCUSS] phoenix-spark connector

2024-08-29 Thread Rejeb Ben Rejeb
Sorry, I explained it badly, I meant spark3 will support both Append and Overwrite mode and both will behave the same way. I agree that the new one is correct and that we shouldn't add support for Overwrite mode. I think it is a better option than keeping old V1 code. I don't think that it is possi

Re: [DISCUSS] phoenix-spark connector

2024-08-29 Thread Istvan Toth
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 2:49 PM Rejeb Ben Rejeb wrote: > Le mer. 28 août 2024 à 10:17, Istvan Toth a > écrit : > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 1:59 PM Rejeb Ben Rejeb > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > REMOVE DATASOURCE V1: > > > After removing V1 code, it is possible to configure V1 name as