Github user kliewkliew commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/238
@chrajeshbabu please review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user kliewkliew opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/238
PHOENIX-3690 Support declaring default values in Phoenix-Calcite: addâ¦
â¦endum to support new interface after CALCITE-1702
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running
Github user kliewkliew closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/208
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user kliewkliew commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/208#discussion_r78300203
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/ExpressionCompiler.java
---
@@ -523,7 +523,12 @@ public Expression visitLeave
Github user kliewkliew commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/208#discussion_r78270028
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/ExpressionCompiler.java
---
@@ -523,7 +523,12 @@ public Expression visitLeave
Github user kliewkliew commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/208#discussion_r78269568
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/ExpressionCompiler.java
---
@@ -523,7 +523,12 @@ public Expression visitLeave
GitHub user kliewkliew opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/208
PHOENIX-3046 `NOT LIKE '%'` unexpectedly returns results
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/kliewkliew/phoenix PH
Github user kliewkliew closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/206
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user kliewkliew commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/207
Based on the wrong branch
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user kliewkliew closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/207
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user kliewkliew opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/207
Phoenix-476 Support declaration of DEFAULT in CREATE statement
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/kliewkliew/phoenix PHOENIX
Github user kliewkliew commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/200
@twdsilva Thanks for committing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user kliewkliew commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/200
@twdsilva Changes were made and rebased,
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user kliewkliew commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/200#discussion_r77374014
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/ExpressionCompiler.java
---
@@ -517,8 +518,13 @@ public Expression visitLeave
Github user kliewkliew closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/198
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user kliewkliew commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/198
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/commit/b7d45ca66729ae57c0896449e36b80f4fdcafb46
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user kliewkliew commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/201
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/commit/06d37e534d1e07e8206eaefb82dd7bf3f50455b0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user kliewkliew closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/201
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user kliewkliew commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/commit/06d37e534d1e07e8206eaefb82dd7bf3f50455b0#commitcomment-18870326
fixes #201
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user kliewkliew commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/206
Are some casting operations more expensive than coercion? Should the
`isCastableTo` checks be moved to their own `else-if` branches below the
`isCoercibleTo` checks?
---
If your project is set
GitHub user kliewkliew opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/206
PHOENIX-2946 Projected comparison between date and timestamp columns â¦
â¦always returns true
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https
Github user kliewkliew closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/199
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user kliewkliew closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/204
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user kliewkliew commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/204
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/commit/d873c2ffd1e539ecd56858c82f0ba2d23e877cf9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user kliewkliew commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/199
Sure, I'll pick up that JIRA. The unit tests evaluate both byte and string
based regex (and compares the two results) but the integration tests only
evaluate string based regex.
---
If
GitHub user kliewkliew opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/204
PHOENIX-1647 Fully qualified tablename query support in Phoenix
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/kliewkliew/phoenix PHOENIX
GitHub user kliewkliew opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/201
PHOENIX-2793 Date-time functions on null dates return no data
I cannot reproduce the issue but I added a test case.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
GitHub user kliewkliew reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/200
PHOENIX-2641 Implicit wildcard in LIKE predicate search pattern
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/kliewkliew/phoenix
Github user kliewkliew closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/200
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user kliewkliew commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/200
Needs more testing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user kliewkliew opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/200
PHOENIX-2641 Implicit wildcard in LIKE predicate search pattern
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/kliewkliew/phoenix PHOENIX
GitHub user kliewkliew opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/199
PHOENIX-2645 Wildcard characters do not match newline characters
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/kliewkliew/phoenix PHOENIX
GitHub user kliewkliew opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/198
PHOENIX-2474 Cannot round to a negative precision (to the left of theâ¦
⦠decimal)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com
33 matches
Mail list logo
