+1
On Monday, May 13, 2019, 1:31:35 PM EDT, Vincent Poon
wrote:
+1
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 8:18 PM Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> +1
>
> I would think it would be a drain on committer time to keep having to
> accommodate interface differences on the EOL line.
>
> > On May 10, 2019, at 1:28
I think we have consensus, we can stop committing to the 1.2 branches from
now on.
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:31 AM Vincent Poon
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 8:18 PM Andrew Purtell
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I would think it would be a drain on committer time to keep having to
> >
+1
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 8:18 PM Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> +1
>
> I would think it would be a drain on committer time to keep having to
> accommodate interface differences on the EOL line.
>
> > On May 10, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Thomas D'Silva
> wrote:
> >
> > Since HBase 1.2 is now end of life and
+1
I would think it would be a drain on committer time to keep having to
accommodate interface differences on the EOL line.
> On May 10, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Thomas D'Silva
> wrote:
>
> Since HBase 1.2 is now end of life and we are creating a new branch to
> support HBase-1.5(PHOENIX-5277), I
+1
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 4:44 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> +1
>
> On 5/10/19 4:28 PM, Thomas D'Silva wrote:
> > Since HBase 1.2 is now end of life and we are creating a new branch to
> > support HBase-1.5(PHOENIX-5277), I think we should drop the HBase-1.2
> > branches. What do folks think?
> >
> >
+1
On 5/10/19 4:28 PM, Thomas D'Silva wrote:
Since HBase 1.2 is now end of life and we are creating a new branch to
support HBase-1.5(PHOENIX-5277), I think we should drop the HBase-1.2
branches. What do folks think?
Thanks,
Thomas
Since HBase 1.2 is now end of life and we are creating a new branch to
support HBase-1.5(PHOENIX-5277), I think we should drop the HBase-1.2
branches. What do folks think?
Thanks,
Thomas
