Thanks to everyone who took the time to review and vote, especially to
Viraj, who has caught an ugly regression early on.
Istvan
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 11:09 AM Ankit Singhal
wrote:
> +1(binding)
>
> * Build from the source - Ok
> * Unit tests (checked for a few of the compatibility modules) -
+1(binding)
* Build from the source - Ok
* Unit tests (checked for a few of the compatibility modules) - Passed
* RAT check - Ok
* Build Phoenix using this RC - OK
* Signature/checksums - Ok
* Changes and ReleaseNotes - Ok
* LICENSE and NOTICE (source and maven artifacts) - ok (though year needs
+1 (non-binding)
* Build from source: ok
* Signature: ok
* Rat-check: ok
* All unit tests in tephra passed
* Build Phoenix master with 0.16.0RC2: ok
On 2020/12/01 08:01:26, "rajeshb...@apache.org"
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - xsums/sigs OK
> - Rat check is passed
> - build successful.
> -
+1 (binding)
- xsums/sigs OK
- Rat check is passed
- build successful.
- Ran tests and all are fine.
Thanks,
Rajeshbabu.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 2:22 AM Josh Elser wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> * xsums/sigs OK
> * CHANGES has reasonable content
> * mvn apache-rat:check passes and `find . -type
+1 (binding)
* xsums/sigs OK
* CHANGES has reasonable content
* mvn apache-rat:check passes and `find . -type f` doesn't show anything
unreasonable
* Can build the code
* Ran many unit tests, but cancelled at ~1hr mark.
* Can build Phoenix master against 0.16.0rc2
On 11/30/20 8:15 AM, Istvan
Please vote on this Apache Phoenix Tephra release candidate,
phoenix-tephra-0.16.0RC2
The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache phoenix tephra 0.16.0
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
The tag to be voted on is 0.16.0RC2
