ware of the background as why it was stopped.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Ram
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > *From:* James Taylor [mailto:jamestay...@apache.org
>> > ]
>> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 23, 2015
> ]
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 23, 2015 2:52 AM
> > *To:* dev@phoenix.apache.org
> > ; Vasudevan,
> > Ramkrishna S
> > *Subject:* Re: master vs. 4.x-HBase-1.1
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes, that was pushed in error. INFRA-10920 was filed to remove it
e.org
> ]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 23, 2015 2:52 AM
> *To:* dev@phoenix.apache.org
> ; Vasudevan,
> Ramkrishna S
> *Subject:* Re: master vs. 4.x-HBase-1.1
>
>
>
> Yes, that was pushed in error. INFRA-10920 was filed to remove it, but
> now it's closed wit
[mailto:jamestay...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 2:52 AM
To: dev@phoenix.apache.org; Vasudevan, Ramkrishna S
Subject: Re: master vs. 4.x-HBase-1.1
Yes, that was pushed in error. INFRA-10920 was filed to remove it, but now
it's closed with a link to another JIRA that links
Yes, that was pushed in error. INFRA-10920 was filed to remove it, but now
it's closed with a link to another JIRA that links more JIRAs - it's
unclear what the resolution is.
Ram - would you mind following up on that?
Thanks,
James
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> Heya,
Heya,
I see we now have a branch 4.x-HBase-1.1. It's pom version is
4.5.0-HBase-1.1-SNAPSHOT. Was this pushed in error?
-n
