Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.12.0 (candidate 2)

With 3 binding +1 (Alan, Cheolsoo and Daniel), 4 nonbinding +1 (Aniket, Prashant, Mark and Jarek), and no -1, the vote pass. I will start the release process. Thanks, Daniel On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > Thanks Rohini! > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Rohini Palanisw

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.12.0 (candidate 2)

Thanks Rohini! On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy wrote: > I guess it is ok. > > Regards, > Rohini > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > > > Hi, Rohini, > > Is it Ok to put it in 0.12.1? It will take sometime to get it in, and > redo > > the RC. > > > > Thank

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.12.0 (candidate 2)

I guess it is ok. Regards, Rohini On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > Hi, Rohini, > Is it Ok to put it in 0.12.1? It will take sometime to get it in, and redo > the RC. > > Thanks, > Daniel > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy > wrote: > > > Daniel, > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.12.0 (candidate 2)

Hi, Rohini, Is it Ok to put it in 0.12.1? It will take sometime to get it in, and redo the RC. Thanks, Daniel On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy wrote: > Daniel, > Can we have > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3492< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3492?

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.12.0 (candidate 2)

Daniel, Can we have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3492 included ? We have many scripts failing in 0.11 because of that issue. Regards, Rohini On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.12.0 (candidate 2)

+1 - Downloaded pig-0.12.0.tar.gz and ran full e2e and unit tests on Hadoop 1.x cluster. On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > +1 > > * Verified top level files > * Run commit tests > > Jarcec > > O

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.12.0 (candidate 2)

+1 * Verified top level files * Run commit tests Jarcec On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:28:57PM -0700, Daniel Dai wrote: > Hi, > > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.12.0. > > Keys used to sign the release are available at > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup > > Pleas

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.12.0 (candidate 2)

+1 (non-binding) Checked signature, checked md5, checked CHANGES.txt and RELEASE_NOTES.txt, ran test-commit, ran simple scripts against a 1.x cluster and 2.x single-node testing new features. On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Prashant Kommireddi wrote: > +1 > >1. ant releaseaudit - Looks good

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.12.0 (candidate 2)

+1 1. ant releaseaudit - Looks good 2. Verified RELEASE_NOTES.txt for correct version numbers 3. Verified build.xml points to next version 4. Built and tested Piggybank, Built tutorial - looks good. 5. Tested jar by running scripts against 2.X cluster 6. ant test-commit - all tes

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.12.0 (candidate 2)

+1 Tried: ant test-commit, piggybank tests, ant docs and checked if they looked good. On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > +1. Downloaded, ran commit-test, piggybank unit tests, tutorial, and > simple local mode smoke tests. Looked over the CHANGES, README, > RELEASE_NOTES file

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.12.0 (candidate 2)

+1. Downloaded, ran commit-test, piggybank unit tests, tutorial, and simple local mode smoke tests. Looked over the CHANGES, README, RELEASE_NOTES files to make sure they looked reasonable. Alan. On Oct 7, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > Hi, > > I have created a candidate build for P

[VOTE] Release Pig 0.12.0 (candidate 2)

Hi, I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.12.0. Keys used to sign the release are available at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup Please download, test, and try it out: http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.12.0-candidate-2/