[jira] [Commented] (PIG-4896) Param substitution ignored when redefined

2016-06-14 Thread Rohini Palaniswamy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15330489#comment-15330489 ] Rohini Palaniswamy commented on PIG-4896: - +1 > Param substitution ignored when redefined >

[jira] [Commented] (PIG-4896) Param substitution ignored when redefined

2016-06-14 Thread Koji Noguchi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15330257#comment-15330257 ] Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-4896: --- bq. Shouldn't this be not equals? Thanks [~rohini]. This is fixed

[jira] [Commented] (PIG-4896) Param substitution ignored when redefined

2016-05-25 Thread Rohini Palaniswamy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15300812#comment-15300812 ] Rohini Palaniswamy commented on PIG-4896: - Shouldn't this be not equals? {code}

[jira] [Commented] (PIG-4896) Param substitution ignored when redefined

2016-05-24 Thread Rohini Palaniswamy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15299029#comment-15299029 ] Rohini Palaniswamy commented on PIG-4896: - bq. store A into '20160515_17:33_1463346753'; NO I

[jira] [Commented] (PIG-4896) Param substitution ignored when redefined

2016-05-17 Thread Koji Noguchi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15287180#comment-15287180 ] Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-4896: --- Testcase in my patch doesn't work on linux. Need to think of one

[jira] [Commented] (PIG-4896) Param substitution ignored when redefined

2016-05-16 Thread Koji Noguchi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15285367#comment-15285367 ] Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-4896: --- For pig 0.11 shell call, it doesn't reuse the previous result because