[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12991539#comment-12991539
]
Richard Ding commented on PIG-847:
--
+1.
Notice schema display change between 0.8 and 0.9 fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987850#action_12987850
]
Daniel Dai commented on PIG-847:
Review request:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/361/
> Setting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12981906#action_12981906
]
Daniel Dai commented on PIG-847:
Yes, I will mark Schema.isTwoLevelAccessRequiredwe deprecate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12981816#action_12981816
]
Alan Gates commented on PIG-847:
I'm 100% behind removing twoLevelAccess, but I don't want to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12981642#action_12981642
]
Ashutosh Chauhan commented on PIG-847:
--
bq. I propose to remove twoLevelAccess, all bag i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12981624#action_12981624
]
Daniel Dai commented on PIG-847:
After code review and prototyping, I don't think we need twoL