Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Ellison Anne Williams < > eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes, as per http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html -- >> >> The code falls under ECCN 5D002, so we are good there.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Ellison Anne Williams < eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, as per http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html -- > > The code falls under ECCN 5D002, so we are good there. > > We need to: > > (1) Notify the USG via the sending the specified email > > (2) Add a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

Yes, as per http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html -- The code falls under ECCN 5D002, so we are good there. We need to: (1) Notify the USG via the sending the specified email (2) Add a README containing the crypto -- Do we have to go through the entire voting process again internally since we

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Ellison Anne Williams < eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Got it - will take care of it tonight/in the morning and report back to > general@incubator > > I'd better notify the USG of the crypto - lol :) > That's the part that had me laughing, all of this source

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

Got it - will take care of it tonight/in the morning and report back to general@incubator I'd better notify the USG of the crypto - lol :) On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > Fyi folks > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Justin

Fwd: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

Fyi folks -- Forwarded message -- From: Justin Mclean Date: Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:48 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release To: gene...@incubator.apache.org Hi, -1 binding, willing to change my vote if encryption code issue

Fwd: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

Email sent to general@incubator to call the vote. Please follow the vote thread there. Thanks! -- Forwarded message -- From: Ellison Anne Williams Date: Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:16 PM Subject: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release To:

Re: Cleaning our Nexus Staging Repo

Looks like my creds had expired although I was still logged in - logging out and back in again, I was able to delete. I will clean it up and send out an email to general@incubator On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > Seems like Nexus does allow

Re: Cleaning our Nexus Staging Repo

Seems like Nexus does allow deleting from Staging repo, it just worked when I tried deleting a sha1. @EllisonAnne u shuld be able to purge the irrelevant artifacts from Nexus and finalize the release. On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Ellison Anne Williams < eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: Cleaning our Nexus Staging Repo

The other option is a little hacky way via SVN. I know it works for pushing artifacts to mirror, but never had to try it on staging. Will give it a quick try now, I am on slack if u would like to talk thru. On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Ellison Anne Williams < eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: Cleaning our Nexus Staging Repo

No dice on deletion of artifacts in a closed repo (shocking, I know...). We will have to go with our current repo. Sorry for the noise! On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Ellison Anne Williams < eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > I took a look and it seemed that 'Download' and 'Delete' were still

Cleaning our Nexus Staging Repo

Since we have to conduct a release vote with the IPMC, I would like to clean our Nexus repo to only include the *-source-release.zip* files as those are the only ones that we are considering for our first release. Please let me know if you have any concerns. Thanks!

[GitHub] incubator-pirk pull request #78: [PIRK-56] -- Change DistributedTestSuite to...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/78 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

Re: Wiki permissions?

On 23/08/16 17:42, Josh Elser wrote: > Oh, either it doesn't list yourself as an admin when you look at it, or > you goofed adding me, Joe :) > > I see Tim and Joe in the list, but don't see myself (or the ability to > add Suneel). Your admin bit was not set Josh. So now we have the following