Would u like me to do it? I would rather someone else did it though, I can
jump in if none show up.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Ellison Anne Williams <
eawilli...@apache.org> wrote:
> Is any other committer volunteering to serve as release manager for our
> release tomorrow/Friday? If I don'
Is any other committer volunteering to serve as release manager for our
release tomorrow/Friday? If I don't hear anything by tomorrow at noon
(EST), I will just assume the duties for this release. ;)
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Walter Ray-Dulany
wrote:
> None here.
>
> On Sep 25, 2016 3:55
I recall that it was tested at the time of merge.
However, for the last month or so, the distributed logging has seemed to
stop working - don't know what caused it or at what point (unfortunately, I
don't think that we were checking the distributed logging for seemingly
unrelated PRs). Walter seem
Looks like this wasn't formatted with the Pirk codestyle before committing
to master - will format and push back to master...
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:22 AM, James Ryan Carr
wrote:
> Added QuerierFactory and EncryptionPropertiesBuilder classes, which should
> make it easier to create a Querier
Github user smarthi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/104
@ellisonanne didn't we test this in distributed mode IIRC when we retired
the old LogUtils and moved to slf4j ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
I suspect that the problems you were having are because this solution
relies on having two distinct log4j settings files, one which is ignored in
the distributed setting and the other of which is ignored in the standalone
setting.
To put it mildly, this 'solution' (and it's mine, so I feel fine
tr
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/105
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user wraydulany commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/105
+1 Works for me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
GitHub user jryancarr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/105
Pirk 71
Added QuerierFactory and EncryptionPropertiesBuilder classes, which should
make it easier to create a Querier object and return it directly to the caller,
rather than having to wr
Great, will do. Unfortunately, I don't think this will be done by end of
week. We'll see.
On Sep 29, 2016 6:32 AM, "Ellison Anne Williams"
wrote:
> I would say that the DistributedTestSuite is ripe for refactor - it grew
> pretty organically and hasn't had a good refactoring yet. ;)
>
> What yo
I would say that the DistributedTestSuite is ripe for refactor - it grew
pretty organically and hasn't had a good refactoring yet. ;)
What you suggested sounds reasonable - look forward to seeing the code.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
> On 29/09/16 01:50, Darin Johnson wr
In general, I am in favor of an abstract class.
However, note that in the distributed case, the 'table' is generated in a
distributed fashion and then used as such too ('split' and distributed).
FWIW - In preliminary testing, the lookup tables ended up not performing
any better at scale than the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/102
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user ellisonanne commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/102
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
On 29/09/16 01:50, Darin Johnson wrote:
> Hey guys, started working on refactoring into submodules and noticed a few
> things.
>
> First the class DistributedTestSuite in org.apache.pirk.tests package is
> directly calling SparkLauncher, which can be avoided using platform
> (already a TODO). This
15 matches
Mail list logo
