Since we appear to be in consensus about keeping the core of Pirk
PIR-focused, I will capture our discussion of the 'Trust Model for Pirk'
on the website (probably a new page). I will issue a PR so that folks can
comment before merge.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Tim Ellison wrote
On 24/07/16 17:35, Ellison Anne Williams wrote:
> There has been a lot of good discussion lately about signing Pirk objects,
> validating, etc in another thread. I would like for us to step back and
> consider the trust model for Pirk.
>
> Pirk is an application that runs within
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Ellison Anne Williams <
eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> There has been a lot of good discussion lately about signing Pirk objects,
> validating, etc in another thread. I would like for us to step back and
> consider the
> validating, etc in another thread. I would like for us to step back and
> consider the trust model for Pirk.
>
> Pirk is an application that runs within a user's system to provide the
> ability to (1) generate a secure query via PIR and/or (2) execute a secure
> query
Hi Guys,
There has been a lot of good discussion lately about signing Pirk objects,
validating, etc in another thread. I would like for us to step back and
consider the trust model for Pirk.
Pirk is an application that runs within a user's system to provide the
ability to (1) generate a s
