Hi,
Having one header wrong is not the end of the world, and as an incubating
project you have a DISCLAIMER for that reason. I’d continue with the vote.
Thanks,
Justin
Actually having another look at it ...
I started rewriting it with Apache Commons CLI till I noticed it already uses
that ... a second look showed that the class contains nothing but the default
way the Apache Commons CLI modules should be used to parse commandline-options.
So if I was to repla
Hi All,
I just was going to start re-writing the file copied from google and noticed
the header was replaced by an Apache header (obviously by myself) ...
the strange thing is that I would never have intentionally done that. All I
could assume is that IntelliJ automatically updated it when I mo
+1 (binding) (cdutz)
Checks performed:
- Checked out using the new tooling: OK
- Checked signatures: OK
- [RM] Checked signature is from a valid Apache signature referencing a valid
Apache-Email address: OK
gpg: Korrekte Signatur von "Christofer Dutz (Apache Comitter)
" [ultimativ]
- Ch
Ups ... the one link [2] was wrong:
Please use this instead:
[2]
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/plc4x/0.2.0-incubating/rc1
Chris
Am 17.11.18, 16:04 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.2.0 has been staged under [2] and it’s time to
vote
Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.2.0 has been staged under [2] and it’s time to vote
on accepting it for release. All Maven artifacts are available under [1].
If approved we will seek final release approval from the IPMC.
Voting will be open for 72hr.
A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more bind
This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes.
If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and then take
the details to this thread.
