Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.2.0 RC1

2018-11-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hashes good - LICENSE and NOTICE have some issues than need to be fix in the next release - No unexpected binary files - All ASF files have ASF headers You are missing LICENSE / NOTICE info for Netty [1][2][3][4][5] I’m not sure i

[JAVA] feature-branch with split up drivers (feature/driver-protocol-split)

2018-11-21 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi all, I just pushed a first version of a refactored project structure (No worries … no API changes). In this I did several things: * I merged the plc4j-core into the API module now we no longer need these double imports that were bugging me all the time. * I split up the s7 protocol

AW: [C/C++] Start of implementation PLC4C

2018-11-21 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi Markus, I’m very happy you made it to the list :-) Even if I’m not too deep into C/C++ and alike, I know that there are several subscribers on this list just waiting for this to pop up. Some just planning on consuming but also ones interested in helping out with the coding. For example Beck

[C/C++] Start of implementation PLC4C

2018-11-21 Thread Markus Sommer
Dear Apache PLC4x Community, Some days ago I met Christofer Dutz at an event in Berlin. He gave a speech about PLC4X. I spoke about AI. From the very first beginning I was fascinated by this project. Later that day he told me more about PLC4X, about the early days, the aim behind and current pr

AW: Code-Retreat on Mallorca?

2018-11-21 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi all, so Sebasitan and I just checked in to LH 1158 and we're on seats 25A and 25B ... so if Julian and Tim would like ... 24 and 26 should still be empty. I'm probably going to switch off and take with me the Beckhoff device and the Siemens S7 1200. I was planning on bringing our new Siemens

AW: [WARNING] Please don't commit anything to `master` effective immediately

2018-11-21 Thread Christofer Dutz
Well we can always discuss this here ... doesn't have to be that was ... just thought that working on master is not ideal and this is the usual branching model I have encountered in most projects. I like it quite much ... even if I agree that it leaves a lot of release branches ... these can b

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.2.0 RC1

2018-11-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-11-17, Christofer Dutz wrote: > So if I was to replace the class with one I wrote, it would sort of > look exactly like that. Would it be ok in this case to leave it as it > currently is (with Apache header)? I'm with Justin here, just go ahead with what you've got right now and decide wh