+1 (non-binding)
I checked:
- Release tag
- Hash and signature
- Tests and build successful locally
- Rat looks ok
On 2021/09/08 18:17:14, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Apache PLC4X Build-Tools Code-Generation 1.5.0 has been staged under
[2]
> and it's time to vote on accepting it for release.
>
>
+1 (non-binding)
I checked:
- Signature and Hash
- Tests and build work locally
- License headers with Apache Rat
On 2021/09/08 18:40:58, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Apache PLC4X Build-Tools Site-Skink 1.1.0 has been staged under [2]
> and it's time to vote on accepting it for release.
>
> All Ma
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- Signatures and Hashes
- Content of README and RELEASE_NOTES (same strange behavior with README as
stated in slack, line encodings seem to be different in zip and in svn)
- Files in svn are similar to those in artefact
- Builds on my system via mvn clean install
Thanks f
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- Signatures and Hashes
- Content of README and RELEASE_NOTES
- Files in svn are similar to those in artefact
- Builds on my system via mvn clean install
Thanks for the work Chris!
Julian
On 2021/09/08 18:40:58, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Apache PLC4X Build-Tools Site-Ski
In preparation for reproducible builds, I set the property for the creation
date to "1".
As soon as the release passes, I was planning on testing the reproducible build
on different systems.
We might be able to automate setting the date to the time the release:prepare
is executed.
But for now
