> And you are exactly right, just log another issue fort he Pool and we hope
> that someone may find the time to have a look there : )
>
>
>
> Julian
>
>
>
> PS.: As you already digged into the code you can try to fix it yourself of
> course, I would be more than happy to get
indeed it seems that we had a
> bug there which could lead tot he socket leak you described.
> I pushed a fix in the branch:
>
> https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/bugfix/close-eventloop-after-channel
>
> Would you mind taking a look and testing this with your code @Adam Rossi?
Adam Rossi created PLC4X-242:
Summary: nioEventLoopGroup thread leak
Key: PLC4X-242
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLC4X-242
Project: Apache PLC4X
Issue Type: Bug
t;
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 4:39 AM Julian Feinauer <
j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> short feedback. I looked into the code and indeed it seems that we had a
> bug there which could lead tot he socket leak you described.
> I pushed a fix in the branch
napshots
>
>
> false
>
>
> true
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> apache-snapshots
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots
>
>
> false
>
>
of the new generation drivers. We're maintaining the 0.6 branch and
> working hard on making the new generation drivers 100% production ready.
>
> Chris
>
>
> Am 23.08.20, 18:06 schrieb "Adam Rossi" :
>
>This is the latest 0.7.0 release from Maven.
>
ris
>
>
>
> Am 23.08.20, 16:40 schrieb "Adam Rossi" :
>
>Howdy. I am seeing a persistent thread being created for every
>plcConnection connect which looks like the following:
>
>Name: nioEventLoopGroup-11-1
>State: RUNNABLE
>Total
Howdy. I am seeing a persistent thread being created for every
plcConnection connect which looks like the following:
Name: nioEventLoopGroup-11-1
State: RUNNABLE
Total blocked: 0 Total waited: 0
Stack trace:
java.base@13.0.2/sun.nio.ch.EPoll.wait(Native Method)
java.base@13.0.2
hat you wanted to convey with this comment *-instead of
> register “4001” try “1”, and of that doesn’t work try “0”. *
>
> Can you please elaborate.
>
>
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 5:16 PM Adam Rossi wrote:
>>
>> Instead of register “4001” try “1”, and of that doesn’t
