Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache PLC4X (incubating) to become a Top-Level-Project at the ASF

2019-04-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2019-04-01, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Therefore I would like to cast a vote that the Apache PLC4X (Incubating) > podling graduates to become a TLP. +1 Stefan

Re: [DRAFT] April Incubator Report ...

2019-03-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2019-03-25, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Three most important unfinished issues to address before graduating: > 1. Building the community: Even if we have managed to attract a diverse >community, it can always be some more people. This is a task that is never "done", at least not as long as

Re: [VOTE] Defining the initial PMC/Committers for graduation

2019-03-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2019-03-25, Christofer Dutz wrote: > So in this VOTE thread I would like everyone on the PLC4X PPMC who > wishes to become part of the PMC of the PLC4X top level project to > vote with +1. -1 While I'm probably going to lurk it is completely unlikely I'll have anything significant to contribu

Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC2

2019-01-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all +1 only a non-technical assessment as usual * Julian's PGP key is where I expected it * hash and sig are good * LICENSE and NOTICE are good (including 2019, kudos ;-) * incubating disclaimer ist there * RAT is happy * zip and git tag match (the zip contains an extra DEPENDENCIES file, lik

Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating)

2019-01-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2019-01-02, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Regarding the Report: > I intentionally didn't submit it before, as I wanted to give others > the chance to respond. But it seems someone already did that for me > when I just wanted to post it. I did, a few hours ago when nobody had responded to your draf

Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating)

2019-01-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all I guess everybody has been busy with the holidays and as usual for us Germans with our budget of vacation most of us are enjoying their beloved ones' presence rather than hack :-) On 2018-12-27, Christofer Dutz wrote: > well it’s reporting time again, so I whipped up a first version … > p

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.2.0 RC1

2018-11-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-11-17, Christofer Dutz wrote: > So if I was to replace the class with one I wrote, it would sort of > look exactly like that. Would it be ok in this case to leave it as it > currently is (with Apache header)? I'm with Justin here, just go ahead with what you've got right now and decide wh

Christofer speaking in Düsseldorf next week

2018-11-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all a co-worker who happens to organize the JUG in Düsseldorf just mentioned Christofer was going to be there next Thursday https://www.meetup.com/de-DE/rheinJUG/events/252159437/ Funny, this is my "home JUG". If anybody else happens to be close, maybe you didn't know either? Stefan

Re: Missing board report

2018-10-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-10-01, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Just waiting for that one last missing +1 on the incubator list, as I > do will like to reference or first release. So far that vote is still > not there :-/ I've been away from the Incubator for a while. My recollection was that Justin's and my votes cary

Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 RC2

2018-09-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-09-26, Julian Feinauer wrote: > @chris: How is the procedure for hotfix releases (in semVer)? Always the same > procedure? If your question is about processes then yes, the ASF process is the same for all kinds of releases. If it is about the version then it is really up to what you agr

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0

2018-09-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-09-24, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, >> * It looks as if plc4x-parent-0.1.0-rc2 was the git tag for the RC as it >> matches the source zip (which misses the .gitignore but includes an >> extra DEPDENDENCIES file, BTW). The name looks a little strange, is >> this going to be "fixed" for th

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0

2018-09-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-09-24, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Isn't this the file you are looking for? > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/plc4x/KEYS It is, I just didn't see it. My fault. > Regarding the stuff that's not included and added additionally > ... it's what the apache release-profile automa

Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 RC2

2018-09-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-09-22, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 RC2 has been staged under [2] and it’s > time to vote on accepting it for release. All Maven artifacts are > available under [1]. If approved we will seek final release approval > from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0

2018-09-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi a few questions as it's been quite some time since I last vetted an Incubator release. * should there be a KEYS file containing Christofer's PGP key somewhere? I've just downloaded it from the keyservers but have come to expect a project wide KEYS file. * do the RELEASE_NOTES require an

Re: [DRAFT] July Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating)

2018-07-05 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all I've just added the draft text to the report collection page: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2018?action=diff&rev2=21&rev1=20 Stefan

Re: [DRAFT] July Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating)

2018-06-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-06-28, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hope I didn’t miss anything … also hope this time I didn’t put in > things the board isn’t interested in. Looks good to me Stefan

Re: Should be investigate using IKVM or similar to start supporting .Net?

2018-05-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-05-24, Christofer Dutz wrote: > yeah ... I read about that ... but thought: "Wouldn't be the only dead > stuff we're all using" ;-) Unfortubately .NET has evolved a bit since then, I don't think IKVM works on .NET Core at all. > Cross-Compiling would have been an easy way out but one we

Re: Should be investigate using IKVM or similar to start supporting .Net?

2018-05-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-05-22, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Now I did start inspecting some options and stumbled over IKVM, which > seems to allow compiling a Java jar into a .Net dll library. This > should be usable in any .Net application. Unfortunately IKVM is dead: http://weblog.ikvm.net/default.aspx?date=2017-0

Re: [DRAFT] March Podling Report PLC4X

2018-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-04-04, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > I don't think you need Mentor to do it. I have added it... > I see Justin being Mentor, so _should_ be easy to get a sign-off. Fortunately there a few folks around. :-) I tend to agree with Niclas about the content. Maybe PLC4X should ask for a blog and re

Re: [DRAFT] February Podling Report PLC4X

2018-03-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-03-05, Christofer Dutz wrote: > New month, new report … here a report I whipped up … please comment on this. Looks good. Stefan

Re: List of supporters on our website?

2018-02-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-02-02, Justin Mclean wrote: > Either way the PPMC can review, provide feedback on, modify etc etc > before it goes live. "Must not be advertisements” is the main thing. +1 in case I've managed to make myself misunderstood (happens a lot ;-): I wasn't suggesting Chris was planning to do

Re: List of supporters on our website?

2018-02-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-02-02, Christofer Dutz wrote: > There is quite a number of companies that support us, even if they are > not actively communicating here or doing any coding. Some are > providing Software, others are supporting the most vital part: > Information. I would like to add a page at a rather prom

Re: List of supporters on our website?

2018-02-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-02-02, Christofer Dutz wrote: > wasn't really planning on doing a "thanks" page, but more a "we think this is > a good idea and support it" sort of thing. In the end your page will look like a thanks page as you mention the companies that helped developing the product :-) Stefan

Re: Using Github and Pull Requests

2018-01-10 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-01-10, Dale LaBossiere wrote: >> On Jan 9, 2018, at 8:07 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: >> ... >> With the current set up we can do both those things i.e. merge PRs and use >> issue if we want. > We can get the merge button on the PR's page to show up for all our > committers? If so, please m

Re: [DRAFT] First Podling Report PLC4X

2018-01-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-01-01, Justin Mclean wrote: > Infra seems to be having a few DNS issues at the moment I’ll submit > when I get a chance later today. We have a few days before it needs to > be submitted anywhere. I've added it and hope I didn't break anything. My incubator fu is a but rusty :-) Stefan >