Re: OPM / Connection Pool

2018-10-26 Thread Sebastian Rühl
Sebastian Rühl > Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Oktober 2018 16:24:28 > An: dev@plc4x.apache.org > Betreff: Re: OPM / Connection Pool > > And btw: > > Regarding timeouts: > https://netty.io/4.1/api/io/netty/handler/timeout/ReadTimeoutHandler.html > <https://netty.io

AW: OPM / Connection Pool

2018-10-26 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hey, is this regarding the feature to return a Future of the send to fail if netty is not able to send something, or? Julian Von: Sebastian Rühl Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Oktober 2018 16:24:28 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: Re: OPM / Connection Pool And btw

Re: OPM / Connection Pool

2018-10-26 Thread Sebastian Rühl
;> >> ____________ >> Von: Christofer Dutz > <mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de>> >> Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Oktober 2018 16:01:37 >> An: dev@plc4x.apache.org <mailto:dev@plc4x.apache.org> >> Betreff: Re: OPM / Connection Pool >

Re: OPM / Connection Pool

2018-10-26 Thread Sebastian Rühl
rwarding the > requests to the pool. > > > Julian > > > Von: Christofer Dutz > Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Oktober 2018 16:01:37 > An: dev@plc4x.apache.org > Betreff: Re: OPM / Connection Pool > > Hi Julian, > > I think we might be

Re: OPM / Connection Pool

2018-10-26 Thread Sebastian Rühl
we have no "common" > field or "query" we can issue. > > > Best > > Julian > > ____________ > Von: Sebastian Rühl > Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Oktober 2018 13:23:55 > An: dev@plc4x.apache.org > Betreff: Re: OPM / Connection Pool > > Hi Julian, >

AW: OPM / Connection Pool

2018-10-26 Thread Julian Feinauer
forwarding the requests to the pool. Julian Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Oktober 2018 16:01:37 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: Re: OPM / Connection Pool Hi Julian, I think we might be thinking of different things when referring to "limiting

Re: OPM / Connection Pool

2018-10-26 Thread Christofer Dutz
as we have no "common" field or "query" we can issue. Best Julian Von: Sebastian Rühl Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Oktober 2018 13:23:55 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: Re: OPM / Connection Poo

AW: OPM / Connection Pool

2018-10-26 Thread Julian Feinauer
a plc specific ping method in the api to call as we have no "common" field or "query" we can issue. Best Julian Von: Sebastian Rühl Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Oktober 2018 13:23:55 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: Re: OPM / Connection Pool H

Re: OPM / Connection Pool

2018-10-26 Thread Sebastian Rühl
Hi Julian, Regarding the reuse of Connections: I was aware of that issue but forgot to add a TODO for that (sorry for that). But in general a pool is not a request limiter rater a connection limiter. Therefore the continue use shouldn’t be that big of an issue for the time being (Till we

Re: OPM / Connection Pool

2018-10-25 Thread Christofer Dutz
aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen From: Julian Feinauer Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 11:13:07 PM To: dev@plc4x.apache.org Subject: OPM / Connection Pool Hey all, just wanted to keep you up to date with some things Sebastian and I discussed off-list. Thanks to Se

OPM / Connection Pool

2018-10-25 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hey all, just wanted to keep you up to date with some things Sebastian and I discussed off-list. Thanks to Sebastians support the Object Plc Mapping (opm) is now mergend into master and I would love to get some feedback. I hope that I can soon add some documentation on the side about that and I