Re: Versioning for Datablocks

2018-12-13 Thread Otto Fowler
n and report a warning in case this is not as expected. Chris Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen -- *From:* Otto Fowler *Sent:* Thursday, December 13, 2018 4:43:34 AM *To:* dev@plc4x.apache.org; Christofer Dutz *Subject:* Re: Versioni

Re: Versioning for Datablocks

2018-12-12 Thread Christofer Dutz
From: Otto Fowler Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 4:43:34 AM To: dev@plc4x.apache.org; Christofer Dutz Subject: Re: Versioning for Datablocks What exactly are you trying to protect from happening? On December 12, 2018 at 14:19:11, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de&l

Re: Versioning for Datablocks

2018-12-12 Thread Otto Fowler
rladen From: Julian Feinauer Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 5:31:34 PM To: dev@plc4x.apache.org Subject: Re: Versioning for Datablocks Hey all, We spontaneously digged into it with wireshark and have generated a .cap to evaluate. The request is a "Get Block Info"

Re: Versioning for Datablocks

2018-12-12 Thread Christofer Dutz
special address syntax for that usecase and not add some new API functions. Chris Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen From: Julian Feinauer Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 5:31:34 PM To: dev@plc4x.apache.org Subject: Re: Versioni

Re: Versioning for Datablocks

2018-12-12 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hey all, We spontaneously digged into it with wireshark and have generated a .cap to evaluate. The request is a "Get Block Info" Request and the Response contains: "Code timestamp", "Interface timestamp" and "Block checksum". I will think about how or where we could implement this as I'm really