[Bug 56440] removeRow in XSSF is much slower than with HSSF

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56440 ki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW OS|

[Bug 56440] removeRow in XSSF is much slower than with HSSF

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56440 ki changed: What|Removed |Added OS|All |Windows 7 -- You are receiving this mail bec

[Bug 56440] removeRow in XSSF is much slower than with HSSF

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56440 --- Comment #3 from ki --- thx for answer me. just the simple file whth the FormulaCell[=IF((COUNT(U224,U225,U226,U227))>0,ROUND(SUM(U224,U225,U226,U227),6),0)]. The file has 2000rows and 100 cols,size is 1.3 MB,not ON ie. to delete 20rows

[Bug 56440] removeRow in XSSF is much slower than with HSSF

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56440 --- Comment #2 from ki --- thx for answer me. Juet the simple file whth the FormulaCell[=IF((COUNT(U224,U225,U226,U227))>0,ROUND(SUM(U224,U225,U226,U227),6),0)]. The file has 2000rows and 100 cols,size is 1.3 MB,not ON ie. to delete 20rows

[Bug 56440] removeRow in XSSF is much slower than with HSSF

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56440 Nick Burch changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|removeRow is too late ... |removeRow in XSSF is much

[Bug 56440] removeRow is too late ...

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56440 Nick Burch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from Nick Bur

[Bug 56440] removeRow is too late ...

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56440 ki changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 56440] New: removeRow is too late ...

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56440 Bug ID: 56440 Summary: removeRow is too late ... Product: POI Version: 3.10 Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSS

RC4 class obsolete?

Hi, I'm currently playing around with xor encryption and as a preparation, I've had a look at the current RC4 implementation (Biff8DecryptingStream & Co.). I've replaced the proprietary RC4-cipher with the JCE-default implementation, but I'm not sure, if there's a reason (apart of never-change-a

[Bug 55818] Add encryption support

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55818 Andreas Beeker changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||51623 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 51623] AgileDecryptor cycles

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51623 Andreas Beeker changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Depends on|

[Bug 56140] ConditionalFormat with formula returns wrong target

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56140 Andreas Beeker changed: What|Removed |Added Component|POIFS |HSSF Hardware|PC

[Bug 56437] [PATCH] Streaming write support in NPOIFS

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56437 Andreas Beeker changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 56437] New: [PATCH] Streaming write support in NPOIFS

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56437 Bug ID: 56437 Summary: [PATCH] Streaming write support in NPOIFS Product: POI Version: 3.11-dev Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 52915] does your POIFS have circular or duplicate block references

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52915 Andreas Beeker changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|---