To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project ooxml-schemas has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Beeker ---
Created attachment 34266
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34266&action=edit
Tikas test file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Beeker ---
Created attachment 34265
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34265&action=edit
extract custom placeholder
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Beeker ---
Added a patch which also extracts custom placeholder. The placeholders in the
example have metro blobs attached and I use those to distinguish between
default and custom placeholders. As this also applie
When I got OOM's with POI because of insufficient heap size, I would
get them when I called wb.write(FileOutputStream).
IIRC I was using POI 3.8 and 3.9 when doing this memory testing.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I see it only reduces the amount of
+1
Sigs and docs look ok.
As this is a final release, please also add a note pointing to #59170 in the
release notes.
FYI, I've removed the obsolete nexus repos.
Andi
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
F
I did my usual tests of comparing release-content and running the newer
jars with my local projects, this time all worked fine for me, so I am
finally
+1
Thanks... Dominik.
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 7:07 PM, David North wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC
Hi,
As far as I see it only reduces the amount of memory held while the file
was open, closing correctly already freed up the memory in previous
versions as well. It also only was visible with read-only access as then we
do not use memory-mapping. The user seems to have a very large file at some
p
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60134
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Stadler ---
See https://builds.apache.org/view/POI/job/POI-API-Check/ for an initial try at
a CI config which performs API comparison with a previous version of POI.
I selected japicmp because clirr seems to be dor
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project ooxml-schemas has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project ooxml-schemas has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
11 matches
Mail list logo
