https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61991
Will Greenway changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61991
Will Greenway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wcgrn...@cox.net
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61991
Bug ID: 61991
Summary: Simple instantiation of XWPFDocument causes reflection
warning and method not found exception
Product: POI
Version: 3.17-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Bringing xmlbeans out of the attic is my vote.
I can be one of the Xmlbeans PMCs if all we are missing is a head count and
a couple emails to infra.
I don't see taking Xmlbeans out of the attic as a huge support burden. It's
a stable, complete product and any future development is probably just
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61989
Alain Fagot Bearez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61832
--- Comment #20 from PJ Fanning ---
There is a Pull Request which uses temp files for constructing the shared
strings table.
https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/85
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61832
--- Comment #19 from Thamodharan ---
My machine specs,
Jboss server
RAM 32 GB
Heap size allocated to jboss 28 GB
Harddisk 1 TB
I am good to go with generating excel file upto a limit of 0.3 million X 200
rows with
If we are going to take on maintenance of XMLBeans, I would suggest that
getting it out of the attic would be the most appropriate course of action.
This would reduce confusion for people trying to find XML Beans as there would
only be a single project to reference rather than one in the attic
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61989
laiwen.li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wrong result of |Wrong result of
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61832
--- Comment #18 from Thamodharan ---
Hi mewalig,
Kindly help us by explaining the calculation which you stated on your last
reply.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61989
Bug ID: 61989
Summary: Wrong result of row(0).cell(0)
Product: POI
Version: 3.17-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61874
Carl Salaets changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You
12 matches
Mail list logo