Re: [VOTE] Apache XmlBeans 5.2.2 release (RC1)

Compared contents and checksums, release-binaries and sources seems to be good. +1 from me for releasing Thanks... Dominik. On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:41 AM PJ Fanning wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache XmlBeans 5.2.2 (RC1). > This is built with Java 8.

Re: xmlbeans and poi releases

Hi P.J. yes, makes sense, the "reproducibility" changes are likely interesting for some OSes which try to make everything build reproducibly. Thanks... Dominik. On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 5:35 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > I'm wondering whether we should do new releases. > The XMLBeans changes don't aff

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache POI 5.3.0 (RC1)

Hi, Any of the comitters, please spend a few minutes and take a look to not make the vote fail due to too less responses! Regards... Dominik. On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 1:33 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > Hello POI Community, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.3.0 (RC1). > > T

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache POI 5.3.0 (RC1)

Hi, I reviewed the contents of the src-package and tested the new version in a few helper projects. Everything looks good on that side. So +1 from me, thanks PJ for preparing the release! Regards... Dominik. On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 1:33 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > Hello POI Community, > > This is

Re: [DISCUSS] POI 5.3.0 release

Hi, I think it the code is in good shape for a release! Thanks... Dominik. On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 4:22 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I think we are in a good position to do an RC for POI 5.3.0. Changelog is > updated at: > https://poi.apache.org/changes.html > > If anyone thinks th

Re: [DISCUSS] XMLBeans 5.2.1 release

http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index525RC1to530RC1.html and http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reportsAll/index525RC1to530RC1.html for detailed results Thanks... Dominik On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 4:36 PM Dominik Stadler wrote: > > Hi P.J. > > Woul

Re: [VOTE] Apache XmlBeans 5.2.1 release (RC1)

Hi, reviewed differences to files from 5.2.0 and verified that signatures match. +1 for release, thanks P.J. for building/releasing! Dominik. On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 6:25 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache XmlBeans 5.2.1 (RC1). > This is

Re: [DISCUSS] XMLBeans 5.2.1 release

Hi P.J. Would be nice if you can run those two releases, I can do the usual large-scale regression test-run to mass-test the release somewhat. Thanks... Dominik. On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 4:19 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > Hi everyone, > > There are a few changes that are merged but not released. > >

Re: Java 11 for POI 5?

So I see two +1 and one -1 from comitters, one user stated a +1 for updating support to Java 11+ in the next major version of Apache POI. Unfortunately still not a very decisive outcome :( So let's ask another way: *Are you using Apache POI with Java 8 and do you think that it needs to continue

Re: Why is org.gradle.caching not enabled?

Hi, Thanks for the research,it seems I committed this back in 2021: Use parallel build to speed up building and running tests > > Enable parallel building and parallel test-execution > Provide a configuration to still build/test serially on CI > via CI_BUILD=TRUE gradle --no-parallel --max-worker

Re: Java 11 for POI 5?

Hi, What do others thing? We currently are at +2/-1 for moving to Java 11 minimum. Would be good if we get a more significant number of votes for this. Thanks... Dominik. On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 10:04 PM Axel Howind wrote: > Hi, > > for whatever reason I cannot reach both the Nabble and Mark

Re: Java 11 for POI 5?

Hi, +1 from me for raising minimum Java to 11 * We can get rid of some build-complexity * Anybody who is at Java 8 should start planning upgrading by now in my opinion * expected performance improvements seen when upgrading are sometimes impressive and make for a very easy business justification

Re: Vulnerability Found: (Click Jacking)

Hi, Please note that posting such reports to public mailing lists is discouraged. Please follow the guidelines outlined at https://www.apache.org/security/ for reporting to the proper lists/channels. Dominik. On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 11:26 AM Elias Finn < elias.ethics.researc...@gmail.com> wrote

Re: Regression in JDK 21.0.1 related to XML signature validation

currently makes tests fail on these JDK versions when run locally with Ant (Gradle does not yet work with JDK 22+): https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8320597 Thanks Dominik On 2023/11/22 13:19:48 Dominik Stadler wrote: > Hi, > > FYI, builds for JDK 21 started to fail recently a

Re: Missing pivot sorting related classes in apache lite

Hi, For compiling you need JDK 8, but Gradle can't find any, e.g. via the following property or running the whole build with JDK 8 -Porg.gradle.java.installations.paths=/custom/path/jdk1.8,/shared/jre11 See https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/toolchains.html for details about this Gradle

Regression in JDK 21.0.1 related to XML signature validation

Hi, FYI, builds for JDK 21 started to fail recently at https://builds.apache.org/job/POI/job/POI-DSL-1.21/. It turns out that JDK 21.0.1 seems to have a regression related to XML Signature Validation compared to JDK 21.0.0! See https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8320597 for the related bug-repo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache POI 5.2.5 (RC1)

Hi, Verified contents of src-package and tested the staging binaries in some projects, everything seems to work fine! Did also run the large regression testing corpus. There were a high number of failures, however those are likely caused by some new checks in poi-integration and a non-determinist

Re: [VOTE] Apache XmlBeans 5.2.0 release (RC1)

Hi, did a check of the contents of binary and source packages and verified checksums, .. everything looks good. So +1 from me! D. On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 10:18 AM PJ Fanning wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache XmlBeans 5.2.0 (RC1). > This is built with J

Re: [DISCUSS] XMLBeans 5.2.0 release

Hi, Sorry for delayed response, I think it a good idea to update XmlBeans first and then include it in an updated POI, thanks PJ for preparing the release! Thanks... Dominik. On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 11:02 AM PJ Fanning wrote: > Since there doesn't seem to be a major rush on getting POI 5.2.5 ou

Re: POI 5.2.5 release

ration but it still > means that there is a regression in 5.2.3 to 5.2.4. > > Surely, we should not be closing input streams - they should be closed by > the provider. We should only close input streams that our code creates > internally. > > What if we call the prospective

Re: POI 5.2.5 release

ath. I am not convinced > that the ZipPackage InputStream changes affect the behaviour when you > provide a File instead. The code handles Files and InputStreams differently. > > > > > > On Wednesday 25 October 2023 at 07:24:52 IST, Dominik Stadler < > dominik.stad...@

Re: POI 5.2.5 release

te: > > This just bit us on Tika: > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67767 > > > > The fix is easy. I can patch it today. It would be great to get it into > > 5.2.5. I'm sorry that I didn't catch it during the earlier regression > > tests.

Re: POI 5.2.5 release

; File file = > try (XSSFWorkbook wb = new XSSFWorkbook(file)) { > ... use wb > } > > Is the sort of usage you are suggesting where we would fail to close an > InputStream? > > > > > > > > > On Sunday 15 October 2023 at 19:37:33 IST, Dominik Stadler &

Re: POI 5.2.5 release

Hi, FYI, the current fix for not closing streams also does not close any stream opened via a "File" parameter, so we are introducing many unclosed resources via this change at the moment. Can we solve this somehow differently? Maybe cleanly revert the change which introduced it? Thanks... Domini

Re: Request to contribure to Apache Poi

Hi, We have collected information about starting development with Apache POI at https://poi.apache.org/devel/index.html It should be mostly up to date as far as I see. Also the sub-pages https://poi.apache.org/devel/subversion.html and https://poi.apache.org/devel/guidelines.html provide addition

[jira] [Commented] (XMLBEANS-641) Fuzzing XMLBeans triggers an assert() for an input-file via Apache POI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17771435#comment-17771435 ] Dominik Stadler commented on XMLBEANS-641: -- Currently fuzzing via oss-

[jira] [Updated] (XMLBEANS-641) Fuzzing XMLBeans triggers an assert() for an input-file via Apache POI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dominik Stadler updated XMLBEANS-641: - Attachment: clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-POIXWPFFuzzer-6733884933668864.docx

Re: [DISCUSS] XMLBeans 5.2.0 release

Yes, would be good to release and then later include it in Apache POI. There is one assert() which can be triggered via POI with a specially crafted file. I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-641 Would be nice to change this to an exception so we can continue to detect un

[jira] [Created] (XMLBEANS-641) Fuzzing XMLBeans triggers an assert() for an input-file via Apache POI

Dominik Stadler created XMLBEANS-641: Summary: Fuzzing XMLBeans triggers an assert() for an input-file via Apache POI Key: XMLBEANS-641 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-641

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache POI 5.2.4 (RC1)

ache/poi/hssf/record/SSTDeserializer.java (working copy).svnpatch.rej ./poi/src/test/java/org/apache/poi/hssf/record/TestSSTDeserializer.java (working copy).svnpatch.rej Dominik. On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 12:31 PM Dominik Stadler wrote: > Hi, > > +1 from me, thanks P.J.! > > Large-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache POI 5.2.4 (RC1)

Hi, +1 from me, thanks P.J.! Large-scale regression testing looks good, only very very few regressions for more than 3mio documents ( ~0.02% ), most are caused by slightly stricter handling (more than 1000 compressed files, more than 300 nested children), a few remaining cases which we can take a

Re: DirectoryNode's getEntry() and IllegalArgumentException

Hi, Seems I added this back in 2019, but I cannot remember why :(. Commit-message says "Adjust handling of some exceptions in regression tests" I assume I tried to give more user-readable error messages for cases where a document has an incorrect extension. Dominik. On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 3:

Re: poi 5.2.4 release

Hi, Yes, I agree, a release soon would be good to get the many many improvements out to users. P.J., could you run the process once more and maybe update documentation along the way so others can do it as well in the future? Not sure how up-to-date https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/site/src/do

Re: POI5.2.3 latest JAR to DLL

Hi, there is no "dll" provided as part of Apache POI. Not sure how you try to get a "dll" from a JAR. If you are actually looking for NPOI, then take a look at https://github.com/nissl-lab/npoi as it is a fully separate project developed independently there. Otherwise I am not sure what function

Re: POI Java 8 CI builds failing

o. The key thing is that > poi-integration tests run ok on newer JDKs so we have coverage. > > On 2023/05/09 18:24:54 Dominik Stadler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This might be caused by "busy loop hangs" in the Java > > "PiscesRenderingEngine", I had a simil

Re: POI Java 8 CI builds failing

Hi, This might be caused by "busy loop hangs" in the Java "PiscesRenderingEngine", I had a similar issue in poi-benchmark , I solved it by switching to the "MarlinRenderingEngine" as described in the second "Note" at https://poi.apache.org/components/slid

Re: Apply "setQuotePrefixed(true)" automatically

Hi, I would fully wrap Apache POI in a clean set of interfaces/factories and this way only provide the minimum necessary methods. If you have lots of existing code, maybe you can style it in a similar way to keep required code-changes small. Otherwise there is always a way to access underlying "

Re: Feedback components/index.html

Hi, Thanks for the note, should be adjusted now along some other versions which were outdated, see https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1909344 Thanks... Dominik. On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 7:22 PM Fernando Teixeira Barros < fernando.tbar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello guys! > There

Re: POI PMC roll call

Hi, You can take a look at https://poi.apache.org/devel/index.html for documentation, please let us know if you get stuck on the way. Regards... Dominik On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 11:48 AM Kamal Chandrashekar wrote: > sry team pls assist me in setting up the code I will try my best. > > On Sun, M

Re: thread locals in POI code

> > > > > On Friday 10 March 2023 at 12:51:40 GMT+1, Dominik Stadler < > dominik.stad...@gmx.at> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > Some of them likely have had a valid use-case and would at least cause > performance issues if removed. > > The issues

Re: thread locals in POI code

Hi, Some of them likely have had a valid use-case and would at least cause performance issues if removed. The issues from Tomcat or other WebServers usually come because they check if memory is lingering at the point when the thread is "given back" to a global pool. XmlBeans also uses ThreadLoca

Re: POI PMC roll call

I'm still following along and look at the odd bug-report from time to time. I can keep the PMC-stuff like board reports going as it is fairly low-effort anyway. As my $dayjob is unrelated since a long time, I will mostly spend time on topics which spur my personal interest, e.g. mass-regression te

Re: xmlbeans bin artifact

Hi, I did take a quick look at artifact xmlbeans-bin-5.1.2-SNAPSHOT-20230225.tgz In the binary-packge, the existing NOTICE/LICENSE are enhanced

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 5.2.3 release (RC1)

Hi, Mass-regression tests look good, only new 11 failures compared to 5.2.0, seems we are slightly more picky about missing columns in xlsx-tables or some new features trigger this now. See http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index520RC1to523RC1.html for "diff" to 5.2.0 and ht

Re: poi 5.2.3 release

Hi, yes, sounds good, I'll also run the big regression testing ( https://github.com/centic9/poi-regression-test) on my large corpus of files over the next few days Regards... Dominik. On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 8:14 PM Tim Allison wrote: > +1 > > I'll have time next week to run against our regres

Re: [VOTE] Apache XmlBeans 5.1.1 release (RC2)

Hi, Did some verification with the release artifacts: * Using XmlBeans in Android Applications now works out of the box * sha512sums match * file-contents compared to 5.1.0 looks sane So I am +1 for release! As always, special thanks to P.J. for rolling the release! Dominik. P.S.: A few of the

Re: xmlbeans 5.1.1 release?

Hi, Sounds good to me! Thanks... Dominik. On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 12:11 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > Hi everyone,Is it worthwhile doing an XMLBeans 5.1.1 release in prep for a > POI 5.2.3 release? There is fair backlog of changes to get out for POI but > it might be nice to get the Android fix for X

Re: JDK 19: Rampdown Phase 2 + JavaOne

Hi, FYI, when executing unit-tests of Apache POI against latest JDK 19 and 20 early access builds, I stumbled across a small change in behaviour for very small double values, I reported https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8291240 to check if this is intended. Thanks... Dominik. On Mon, Jul 25, 2

Re: module-info.class files

Hi PJ, You can run Gradle with "--info :poi:jar" to make it print out details about why it does or does not run some tasks. Here it seems an "onlyIf" in the main build.gradle at line 187 is the culprit. It seems the "onlyIf" here leads to these the "java9" tasks being skipped always. These were a

[jira] [Commented] (XMLBEANS-616) is there a dead lock in loading the SOAP Service Concurrently

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566729#comment-17566729 ] Dominik Stadler commented on XMLBEANS-616: -- This looks very strange

[jira] [Commented] (XMLBEANS-616) is there a dead lock in loading the SOAP Service Concurrently

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17562806#comment-17562806 ] Dominik Stadler commented on XMLBEANS-616: -- Are you sure this is a dead

[jira] [Resolved] (XMLBEANS-612) Adjust Class loading to allow using XMLBeans on Android

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dominik Stadler resolved XMLBEANS-612. -- Resolution: Fixed Applied the change via revision r1901904 > Adjust Class load

[jira] [Updated] (XMLBEANS-612) Adjust Class loading to allow using XMLBeans on Android

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dominik Stadler updated XMLBEANS-612: - Summary: Adjust Class loading to allow using XMLBeans on Android (was: Adjust Class

[jira] [Commented] (XMLBEANS-612) Adjust Class loading for using XMLBeans on Android

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17554079#comment-17554079 ] Dominik Stadler commented on XMLBEANS-612: -- [~pj.fanning] I can do

[jira] [Updated] (XMLBEANS-612) Adjust Class loading for using XMLBeans on Android

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dominik Stadler updated XMLBEANS-612: - Description: The project [https://github.com/centic9/poi-on-android] allows to run

[jira] [Created] (XMLBEANS-612) Adjust Class loading for using XMLBeans on Android

Dominik Stadler created XMLBEANS-612: Summary: Adjust Class loading for using XMLBeans on Android Key: XMLBEANS-612 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-612 Project: XMLBeans

Re: [VOTE] Apache XmlBeans 5.1.0 release (RC4)

Hi, looks all good now, +1 from me, thanks for adjusting/improving the build until we can do another high-quality release! Thanks... Domink. On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 5:20 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache XmlBeans 5.1.0 (RC4). > This is bui

Re: [VOTE] Apache XmlBeans 5.1.0 release (RC3)

Hi, File-contents looks good now, but it seems they now contain Java 11 class-files. Are we missing some "Keep Java 8 compatibility" in the Gradle build or do we rather need to use the Java 8 artefacts for release? If i use the newer build from https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/

Re: [VOTE] Apache XmlBeans 5.1.0 release (RC1)

I quickly tried to fix/adjust a few things, maven-xml-version and java9 folders should be fine now, maybe you can roll a RC2 with those to see if we are good now. Thanks... Dominik. On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 9:25 AM Dominik Stadler wrote: > Hi PJ, > > that already looks better, the

Re: [VOTE] Apache XmlBeans 5.1.0 release (RC1)

Java 11 are > missing this. > > So -1 from me for the RC1. I will see what can be done to get an RC2 > together but Gradle is not an area of expertise for me. > > > > > > > On Friday 3 June 2022, 16:04:46 IST, Dominik Stadler < > dominik.stad...@gmx.at> w

Re: [VOTE] Apache XmlBeans 5.1.0 release (RC1)

Hi, As always, thanks PJ for preparing the release! I compared release artifacts and the contents of directory META-INF in the main jar-file is fairly different between 5.0.3 and 5.1.0, probably due to switching to Gradle. Is this expected? The "Java 9+" support may break because related files

Re: xmlbeans 5.1.0 release

+1 Dominik. On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 5:22 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > Hi everyone, > There are a fair number of unreleased changes in XMLBeans. Is it time for > a v5.1.0 release? > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-604?jql=project%20%3D%20XMLBEANS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Versio

Re: want to provide patch

Hi, This is the default workflow of Github-repositories. You need to create a fork of the code into a new repository, create the branch there and then send a PR to the main repo. The following might help: * https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/working-with-for

Re: poi-src-5.2.2-20220312.zip SHA sums mismatch

Hi, downloading works for me, but I also see a difference in sha512 and sha256 checksums: $ sha512sum dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/src/poi-src-5.2.2-20220312.zip ae404f0df06852ea65328f893d566a2b29d442a1506a3aeef17272c1ca529802402dc6900229456cebce29bff512d396b3aec0896687ae185fe701a149904db3

Re: Log4j

The page is updated now to focus more on the state since Apache POI 5.1.0 and it also describes the options with slf4j a bit more. Let us know if you think more content would be useful. Thanks... Dominik. On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:12 PM Timothy Spear wrote: > Ah, then the second line in the l

Re: poi-ooxml-lite: Check in list of classes and xsb-files to avoid the jar-to-test dependency

This is committed now, let me know if it causes issues. Dominik On Sun, 20 Mar 2022, 16:50 Dominik Stadler, wrote: > Hi Devs! > > I would like to get some review of a change that I prepared which would > make working with Apache POI easier (at least for me) > > I propose t

poi-ooxml-lite: Check in list of classes and xsb-files to avoid the jar-to-test dependency

Hi Devs! I would like to get some review of a change that I prepared which would make working with Apache POI easier (at least for me) I propose to persist the list of classes/xsbs instead of creating them on-the-fly every time the build is executed. This would then be similar to how we build th

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 5.2.2 release (RC2)

Hi, I compared the contents of the release and tested some projects with the release, everything looks fine! +1 from me. Thanks PJ for yet another spot-less release-build! Thanks... Dominik. On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 11:29 AM PJ Fanning wrote: > Hi everyone, > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 5.2.1 release (RC1)

Hi, I compared jars and zips between 5.2.0 and 5.2.1, everything looks fine on this side. Also upgrading to the RC for some projects did work fine. Great work PJ! +1 from me. Dominik On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:12 AM PJ Fanning wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've prepared artifacts for the release

Re: Missing class in latest snapshots

x release) and none contain > com/microsoft/schemas/office/visio/x2012/main/TriggerType. > > We can add extra classes to the lite if we need to. > > Regards, > PJ > > > > > > > On Wednesday 23 February 2022, 22:17:04 GMT+1, Dominik Stadler < > dominik.stad...

Missing class in latest snapshots

Hi, when I try to test something with the latest -jar files built off of trunk, I get the following exception. Do we miss some classes in poi-ooxml-lite now? After adding poi-ooxml-full, it works again. Thanks... Dominik. Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Could not create type at

Re: Cannot resolve type when upgrading to Apache POI 5.2.0 in poi-on-android

ebruary 2022, 23:13:35 GMT+1, PJ Fanning > wrote: > > > > > > Aim would be to reproduce the issue in a non-android env and that would > make it easier to try to find a fix. > > > > > > > On Tuesday 8 February 2022, 23:10:39 GMT+1, Dominik Stadler < &g

Re: Cannot resolve type when upgrading to Apache POI 5.2.0 in poi-on-android

his might cause it to fail in same way as > on android env. > > > > > > > On Tuesday 8 February 2022, 22:32:26 GMT+1, Dominik Stadler < > dominik.stad...@gmx.at> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > when I try to update Apache POI from 4.1.2 to 5.2.0 in th

Cannot resolve type when upgrading to Apache POI 5.2.0 in poi-on-android

Hi, when I try to update Apache POI from 4.1.2 to 5.2.0 in the sample-project that provides Apache POI for Android Apps ( https://github.com/centic9/poi-on-android ), I get a very strange exception. It seems that some of the resources are not found, although they are present properly as far as I

[jira] [Updated] (XMLBEANS-597) Improve support for using XMLBeans on Android

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dominik Stadler updated XMLBEANS-597: - Description: The project [https://github.com/centic9/poi-on-android] allows to run

[jira] [Reopened] (XMLBEANS-597) Improve support for using XMLBeans on Android

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dominik Stadler reopened XMLBEANS-597: -- Thanks for the idea, unfortunately I don't know much about the XmlBeans code so d

[jira] [Updated] (XMLBEANS-597) Improve support for using XMLBeans on Android

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dominik Stadler updated XMLBEANS-597: - Description: The project [https://github.com/centic9/poi-on-android] allows to run

[jira] [Resolved] (XMLBEANS-597) Improve support for using XMLBeans on Android

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dominik Stadler resolved XMLBEANS-597. -- Resolution: Fixed Added a system property via https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view

[jira] [Created] (XMLBEANS-597) Improve support for using XMLBeans on Android

Dominik Stadler created XMLBEANS-597: Summary: Improve support for using XMLBeans on Android Key: XMLBEANS-597 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-597 Project: XMLBeans

Re: Java 9+ build issues

rote: > > > > > > Hi Andreas, > I'm ok with reverting the test jar changes. > > > > > > > On Saturday 22 January 2022, 22:06:41 GMT+1, Dominik Stadler < > dominik.stad...@gmx.at> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > sorry for bre

Re: Java 9+ build issues

Hi, sorry for breaking the build, unfortunately these Java 9+ module stuff is quite a mystery for me as well.We can revert to the previous state if you think your current solution is not final. Would be nice if we can decide to ditch Java 8 at some point so we can simplify the build and then have

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 5.2.0 release (RC2)

On Logging dependencies: As far as I understand it, we should not deliver such "log-framework-x to log-framework-y" dependencies as part of a library as it can lead to endless-loops of forwarding logs back and forth if an application or another library includes the reverse forwarding. So my propos

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 5.2.0 release (RC2)

Hi, mass-regression testing looks good, we now actually successfully process 2695 documents which failed before in 5.1.0, nice! also a quick comparison of release files looks good. +1 from me. Thanks... Dominik. On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 5:33 PM Axel Howind wrote: > +1 > > > > > Am 07.01.2022

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 5.2.0 release (RC1)

Hi, I did a partial regression-test round and found a few smaller issues, some of the new limits are hit by some valid test-files, so I increased a few of those a bit. Not sure how likely such documents are encountered out there, but if we want to keep handling those without regressions, we should

Re: [VOTE] Apache XmlBeans 5.0.3 release (RC2)

+1 Thanks for another well-built release! Dominik. On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 9:11 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache XmlBeans 5.0.3 (RC2). > > The most notable changes in this release are: > > * SampleXmlUtil misses root element with only o

Re: [VOTE] Apache XmlBeans 5.0.3 release (RC1)

+1, looks good from a quick look, thanks for preparing the release! Dominik. On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 10:55 PM Andreas Beeker wrote: > +1 - I've compared the contents of 5.0.2 vs 5.0.3, and only saw those > minimal changes. > > Thank you for providing the RC. > > Andi > > On 12.12.21 20:56, PJ

Re: flaky tests on CI/CD

Hi P.J. for parallel building, it should be disabled via CI_BUILD=TRUE environment variable, but maybe this is not working properly, do you have a link to a failing build? I could only see the SVN timeouts in recent failures. For the SVN timeouts, hopefully https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/I

Re: Move poi:main:org.apache.poi.hssf.dev to poi:test

s another alternative: > https://github.com/kiwiwings/poi-visualizer > > Andi > > On 25.11.21 07:32, Dominik Stadler wrote: > > Hi Andi, > > > > It seems you removed the main() method from BiffViewer as part of this > > move. This was a handy tool on it's

Re: Move poi:main:org.apache.poi.hssf.dev to poi:test

Hi Andi, It seems you removed the main() method from BiffViewer as part of this move. This was a handy tool on it's own for inspecting the raw contents of .xls files, fairly useful when investigating bugs with handling of the raw format in HSSF. Is there a replacement? Not sure about the other to

Re: ExcelCetabFunctionExtractor/functionMetadataCetab.txt and FILTER function

Hi, it seems I was the last one touching this around 2 1/2 years ago, but unfortunately I do not remember exactly why/how. I found the file functionMetadataCetab-PDF.txt still lying around on my disk, it seems to be some extract of the PDF-SPECS that I did at that time. I attach it here, maybe i

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 5.1.0 release (RC2)

+1 from me, compared the contents of jars/zips/targzs and looks good. Also tried to upgrade a small tool which uses POI, which worked fine. One small thing: Probably does not block the release but the "poi-scratchpad" is missing from the Maven Staging repository. Thanks a lot for pushing the rele

Re: Thank you! JDK 18 Early Access build 20 is now available

Thanks Rory for all the work! We wish you a happy time with your family! And welcome to David! The Quality Outreach program is really a big improvement for us, having a more direct way of discussing issues that our testing reveals on pre-releases helps us a lot when testing the library and improv

Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?

nst our corpus if that'd > be of any use. > > Many thanks! > >Best, > > Tim > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:57 AM Dominik Stadler > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > You are right, we discussed the reasons before, I am sorry. > > > &

Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?

Hi, You are right, we discussed the reasons before, I am sorry. LG... Dominik. On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 9:06 PM Andreas Beeker wrote: > Hi Dominik, > > > Would be nice to know what changes made them required now as the > documents themselves did not change. > > I think you know, but to be safe,

Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?

gt; see if the community needs the lite jar at all. Some users still try to use > POI on android and maybe they would prefer smaller jar sizes. > > > > > > > On Monday 18 October 2021, 11:54:04 IST, Dominik Stadler < > dominik.stad...@gmx.at> wrote: > > >

Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?

point. > > > > > > > On Monday 18 October 2021, 08:05:21 IST, Dominik Stadler < > dominik.stad...@gmx.at> wrote: > > > > > > FYI, I did re-run the mass-testing and the missing schema is still > reported a lot (>90k times). > > One sample

Re: [VOTE] Apache XmlBeans 5.0.2 release (RC2)

Hi, Thanks for the changes, this looks good now when comparing 5.0.2 to 5.0.1 binaries and sources! And using the binaries directly from the Jenkins job is a good idea, then we avoid local variations and have a canonical environment which produces releases! Not sure how much is missing so we can

Re: [VOTE] Apache XmlBeans 5.0.2 release (RC1)

Hi, I compared the contents of packages for 5.0.2 with 5.0.1, I found some differences that we should check: * dist.apache.org \repos\dist\release\poi\xmlbeans\dev\bin\xmlbeans-bin-5.0.2-20211013.tgz\xmlbeans-5.0.2\samples\MixedContent\build * dist.apache.org \repos\dist\release\poi\xmlbeans\dev\

Re: XMLBeans 5.0.2 release

Yes, thanks for all the work! Go for it! Dominik. On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 7:57 PM Andreas Beeker wrote: > Hi PJ; > > thank you for all the work you've put in the last months - actually > unbelievable. > I think it's good, if someone else gives releasing also a try - so +1 from > me. > As I made

Re: forrest question

Hi, I think this is introduced via the forrest-"skin" that is used, so a proper fix that avoids having to grep/sed would need a change to Forrest to fix this. $ grep -R google.com/search /opt/apache/forrest/apache-forrest-0.9 /opt/apache/forrest/apache-forrest-0.9/main/webapp/skins/pelt/xslt/html

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >