https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69366
--- Comment #3 from fjyoyd89f...@mail.ru ---
I got some results. New tests
@Test
public void testBug69366ColorSameCell() throws IOException {
try (Workbook workbook = new XSSFWorkbook()) {
final Sheet sheet
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69366
--- Comment #2 from fjyoyd89f...@mail.ru ---
Of cause second from the end line should be
CellUtil.setCellStylePropertiesEnum(cell2, properties);
But bug exist even for same cell
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69366
--- Comment #1 from fjyoyd89f...@mail.ru ---
Just to check on last commit
(https://github.com/apache/poi/commit/f1a5571a617b62219df99a5faf7eaa7ce4cf0850)
I wrote test
@Test
public void testBug69366() throws IOException {
try
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69366
Bug ID: 69366
Summary: CellUtil.setCellStyleProperties(Cell, Map) doesn't found same styles sometimes
Product: POI
Version: 5.3.0-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69366
fjyoyd89f...@mail.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
CC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69265
--- Comment #5 from nikknp.du...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 39887
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39887&action=edit
screenshot showing the hyperlink type as URL/file instead of email
screenshot show
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69265
nikknp.du...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69277
--- Comment #1 from nikknp.du...@gmail.com ---
Only difference with .xls is that it shows correctly when I get the type as
hyperlink.getType()
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69265
--- Comment #4 from nikknp.du...@gmail.com ---
I also tried with xlsx type. There if I try to set the hyperlink with type
email, it shows correctly in the hyperlink object as provided by
hyperlink.getType() method. However, if we save the file
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
r1917583 was in the POI 5.3.0 release - can you try that out?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983
--- Comment #4 from haoheng.zh...@pwc.com ---
Hi, do we have a plan to fix this bug in the next 2 months? What release
version the fix would go in?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69351
--- Comment #4 from asdf...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #2)
> Thanks for the test case.
>
> Can I ask how you came across this issue? This is a 20 year internal POI
> class which is only used for a couple of
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69351
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69351
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69351
asdf...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|All |Windows 10
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69351
asdf...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from asdf
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69351
Bug ID: 69351
Summary: org.apache.poi.util.IntList.removeValue(int) raises
"java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException"
Product: POI
Version: 5.3.0-FINAL
Ha
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69341
Matafagafo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matafag...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69341
Bug ID: 69341
Summary: Formula: =PRODUCT(A1:A2) with True, True falsely
evaluates to 0
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69315
--- Comment #4 from Dominik Hölzl ---
The test case you provided fails when adding
assertNotNull(mapi.getMainChunks().getRawProperties().get(MAPIProperty.CLIENT_SUBMIT_TIME));
after
assertNotNull(mapi.getMessageDate());
getMessageDate
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983
haoheng.zh...@pwc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haoheng.zh...@pwc.com
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69315
--- Comment #3 from Dominik Stadler ---
I tried to reproduce the proposed fix, but could not.
@Test
void testBug69315() throws Exception {
POIDataSamples testData = POIDataSamples.getPOIFSInstance();
try (MAPIMessage
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69315
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Hölzl ---
Created attachment 39870
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39870&action=edit
E-Mail with a multi valued named property
This e-mail contains the multi valued named property 8
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65943
--- Comment #9 from KarlRamsey ---
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #7)
> https://bananagame.co is a publicly
> accessible URL.
>
> Talk to your ISP or your network admin.
There are no planned releases - we've recently do
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43648
--- Comment #2 from Rick ---
I appreciate the author's willingness to take risks and push boundaries.
https://786.osttopstfreeware.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68615
Matafagafo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matafag...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68714
Matafagafo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matafag...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66687
--- Comment #2 from Martin Schlömer ---
I have not been working on this for more than a year now, so maybe i'm
misremembering things.
We use templates created by customers and complete them with JXLS
programmatically. If the issue is wit
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66687
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66827
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68615
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68615
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|getSummaryInformation |getSummaryInformation
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68714
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69127
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69265
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #3 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69315
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68779
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69212
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68779
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69021
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69178
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69163
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69212
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Stadler ---
No update, thus closing, please reopen with more information including a
standalone reproducer-test-case if you still encounter this in a more recent
version than the fairly outdated 3.x.
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69267
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|POI Overall |SS Common
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69294
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69315
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailable
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69324
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69322
--- Comment #5 from lwd ---
github
address:https://github.com/a96219/TempFilePackagePartsError/blob/main/src/main/java/org/example/OPCPackageTest.java
Set the JVM parameter - Xmx100M then run org.Example.OPCPackageTest.main
method. Ran
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69322
--- Comment #4 from lwd ---
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #3)
> In ran the test case on my Macbook and it worked ok. No exceptions and wrote
> out the xlsx file. I made no modifications to the code to get it to work.
So
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69324
--- Comment #2 from sfis...@gmail.com ---
PJF: to be fair, there are use cases where the spreadsheet being processed by
POI is treated as a System of Record, requiring POI to exercise calculations
after inputs are modified.
DR: part of what
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69324
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69324
Bug ID: 69324
Summary: Add AGGREGATE function like SUBTOTAL
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69322
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
In ran the test case on my Macbook and it worked ok. No exceptions and wrote
out the xlsx file. I made no modifications to the code to get it to work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69322
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
It might be worth trying to test with an updated commons-compress (1.27.1) jar.
poi-ooxml 5.2.0 uses the latest commons-io jar.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69322
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
Unfortunately, that exception seems to be happening in commons-io.
commons-io is a different ASF project.
All POI is doing is writing bytes to a commons-compress ZipArchiveOutputStream
- and commons
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69323
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69323
Bug ID: 69323
Summary: Regression in commit 1def0cba38 , the poifiles tmp
directory is expected to exist for the lifespan of the
application
Product: POI
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69322
lwd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a96219...@gmail.com
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69322
Bug ID: 69322
Summary: setting useTempFilePackageParts is true Cause an
error: Fail to save: an error occurs while saving the
package : arraycopy: destination index out of bounds
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69209
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68094
--- Comment #15 from PJ Fanning ---
https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/657 will appear in v5.3.1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68094
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||elena.alexandrova@betanxt.c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69321
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69321
Bug ID: 69321
Summary: The sheet columns not auto sized in v.5.3.0
Product: POI
Version: 5.3.0-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69314
August <4u6...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||4u6...@gmail.com
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69314
Tim Allison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Header content from .doc|Header content from a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69314
Bug ID: 69314
Summary: Header content from .doc not extracted
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69308
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
Henry changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #16 from Henry ---
(In
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
Axel Howind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63665
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
--- Comment #14 from PJ Fanning ---
Weblogic might rely on an older version of commons-io and this might conflict
with the newer version of commons-io needed by POI.
My understanding is that you can specify 'Parent Last' classlo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
--- Comment #11 from Axel Howind ---
Can you re-check the attached source? This does not seem to be compilable:
logger.error("inicia crearexcel");
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
--- Comment #10 from sfis...@gmail.com ---
your stack trace indicates that the application is running inside weblogic.
have you ruled out a conflict with any/all the bundled libraries that an EE
container brings into the environment.
it is
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
Henry changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INFORMATIONPROVIDED
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
Henry changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
--- Comment #7 from Henry ---
Created attachment 39862
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39862&action=edit
stack_trace.txt
stacktrace error
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
--- Comment #6 from Henry ---
Got stacktrace with catching Throwable
Error :
org.apache.commons.io.output.UnsynchronizedByteArrayOutputStream.builder()Lorg/apache/commons/io/output/UnsynchronizedByteArrayOutputStream$Builder;
Consider that
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
Why don't you try catching Throwable? Even for debugging purposes.
Btw this is not a bug, it is a request for random people to debug your code for
you and that is not what bugzilla is for.
--
Yo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
--- Comment #4 from Henry ---
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #3)
> can you provide the actual stack trace?
>
> Are you using a build tool - eg Gradle? Build tools are good at sorting out
> dependencies.
-this is not possib
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
--- Comment #2 from Henry ---
Java version
openjdk version "1.8.0_402"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_402-b06)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.402-b06, mixed mode)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the as
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
--- Comment #1 from Henry ---
Created attachment 39861
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39861&action=edit
part of the source code
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69304
Bug ID: 69304
Summary: error creating an instance of XSSFWorkbook
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69303
Piotr Wilkin changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
CC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69303
Bug ID: 69303
Summary: RangeCopier.copyRange doesn't check merged ranges
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Pri
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59687
--- Comment #2 from Godrej Tiara ---
Your take on this subject is truly refreshing. It adds a new layer of
understanding to the conversation. Well done!
https://www.godrejtiara.info/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69266
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68778
--- Comment #13 from Hani Naguib ---
Not sure this is related by I get the same exception although with a different
call stack.
java.lang.RuntimeException: Fontconfig head is null, check your fonts or fonts
configuration
at
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69294
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69294
Rakhi Barayanan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69294
Bug ID: 69294
Summary: Getting 'functionMetadata.txt' not found error in
5.2.5
Product: POI
Version: 5.3.0-FINAL
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69288
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69288
--- Comment #4 from samo.re...@gmail.com ---
Wait, I found a funny workaround. I created three mock files:
AffineTransform.java
> package java.awt.geom;
>
> import java.awt.font.FontRenderContext;
>
> /**
> * Just an empt
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69288
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #3 from Dominik
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69288
--- Comment #2 from samo.re...@gmail.com ---
> https://github.com/centic9/poi-on-android/
I am aware of that project. We don't use it anymore though. It's a bit finicky
to get it to work, especially the shadowJar Gradle plugin.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69288
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69288
Bug ID: 69288
Summary: SXSSFSheet constructor unnecessarily rethrows
NoClassDefFoundError on Android
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS
1 - 100 of 3185 matches
Mail list logo
