https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68094
--- Comment #21 from PJ Fanning ---
There are still some unreleased changes so the most practical solution for
people who think autoSizeColumn is making the columns too narrow or too wide is
to make the autosize calls and then to loop over the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69794
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
We don't accept advertising spam.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69794
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69794
Bug ID: 69794
Summary: Unable to print excel report
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69628
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69637
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69628
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailable
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69609
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69563
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69547
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69544
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69541
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69791
Bug ID: 69791
Summary: MINIFS fails to evaluate in Excel
Product: POI
Version: 5.4.2-FINAL
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68094
Daniel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel77lun...@icloud.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60102
Daniel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||Carro, trygg
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69784
Bug ID: 69784
Summary: Double borders and borders over hanging PPTX2PNG
Product: POI
Version: 5.4.2-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69777
Matafagafo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matafag...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69777
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
There is nowhere (to my knowledge) that we have documented that setCellType
preserves the value. You should never assume what the behaviour is, especially
when it is ambiguous. If we change this, we are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69777
Bug ID: 69777
Summary: When using XSSF, calling
cell.setCellType(CellType.STRING) on a cell with
original type STCellType.INLINE_STR results in the
cell value
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769
Tim Heger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johannes.summerer@krause-sc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769
Tim Heger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tim.he...@krause-schopp.de
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769
--- Comment #5 from Tim Heger ---
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #1)
> What is the origin of the broken xlsx - that is what application or library
> produced it?
We are a leading company in the field of data standardizati
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
Surely you know which customer sent you the broken file. Is there PII in the
file because that will get us in trouble? If there is no PII in the file, can't
you ask the customer to find out what applic
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
Not a bug. You said so yourself - read the ECMA-376 spec.
I looked the poi-ooxml code and trimming strings before parsing them as numbers
is rare in the code.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769
--- Comment #2 from Tim Heger ---
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #1)
> What is the origin of the broken xlsx - that is what application or library
> produced it?
We are a leading company in the field of data standardizati
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
What is the origin of the broken xlsx - that is what application or library
produced it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769
Bug ID: 69769
Summary: XSSFSheetXMLHandler throws NumberFormatException when
in t="s" cell contains trailing whitespace
Product: POI
Version: 5.4.1-FINAL
Ha
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69749
--- Comment #3 from szfz...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to sfisque from comment #1)
> not a bug. it's telling you exactly where the issue is, in the stacktrace.
>
> '{' is not a valid URI character. try uri-encoding
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69749
--- Comment #2 from szfz...@gmail.com ---
Why uri-encode?
Both Microsoft Office Excel and Chrome accept '{' in url already.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69749
sfis...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from sfis
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69749
Bug ID: 69749
Summary: XSSFHyperlink error setting address
Product: POI
Version: 5.4.1-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69744
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69744
--- Comment #3 from Jacobo Aragunde Pérez ---
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #2)
> This looks like a bug to me. I'm happier breaking stuff when there is bona
> fide bug. Can you create a PR that adds the 5 correct enu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69744
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
This looks like a bug to me. I'm happier breaking stuff when there is bona fide
bug. Can you create a PR that adds the 5 correct enum values in TableRowAlign?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69744
--- Comment #1 from Jacobo Aragunde Pérez ---
I started taking a look at this, the trivial approach would be to add
TableRowAlign.START and END so we would map the possible jc values like this:
public enum TableRowAlign {
LEFT
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69744
Bug ID: 69744
Summary: XWPFTable.getTableAlignment throws
IllegalArgumentException
Product: POI
Version: 5.4.x-dev
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
--- Comment #9 from Dominik Stadler ---
Sounds like a different problem, please share details including error messages
and how you use Apache POI in a new issue. Ideally with a self-sufficient
code-sample which allows to reproduce the problem
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742
--- Comment #2 from aniu007 <969675...@qq.com> ---
Related code
try{
File wordFile = new File("D:\\website\\temp\\myWordFile.docx");
File htmlFile = new File("D:\\website\\temp\\myWordFile.html");
Strin
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742
aniu007 <969675...@qq.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742
Bug ID: 69742
Summary: An error occurred when converting a word file to
XWPFDocument, indicating java.io.IOException: Failed
to read zip entry source.
Product: POI
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
--- Comment #8 from Rakhi Barayanan ---
Hi Dominik,
Issue is still the same.We are not able to generate the complete report.If the
number of rows are less its creating good.But as the row number increases it is
throwing error.Earlier the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69720
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
Rakhi Barayanan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69720
--- Comment #2 from Jacobo Aragunde Pérez ---
Created attachment 40055
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40055&action=edit
Test case, saved by Word
Test case where both calls to getAlignment() return LEFT.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69727
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69718
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
OS|Mac OS X 10.1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69727
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
I've created a PR - https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/837
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69720
--- Comment #1 from Jacobo Aragunde Pérez ---
For extra confusion, Word uses the "left" value for alignment, while
LibreOffice prefers "start". If I re-save the attached test case with Word,
both paragraphs would return
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729
Axel Howind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729
--- Comment #8 from PJ Fanning ---
I would suggest that you install Java 8 and Java 11 if Gradle on Windows can't
download Java 11 for you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729
--- Comment #7 from PJ Fanning ---
The thing is that Gradle already is configured to do this for you.
The OP has not even stated what the issue is. If you read their question on
stackoverflow, they are providing little or no evidence of work
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729
--- Comment #6 from Dominik Stadler ---
I updated the text at https://poi.apache.org/devel/index.html via r1926808 to
mention JDK 11.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729
--- Comment #5 from Axel Howind ---
I think you actually do need a Java 9 compiler (for the module info), even when
a java 8 compiler is used for the rest. So yes, you technically need a java 9
compiler to build even if the resulting jar will
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729
Shilpa BN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729
--- Comment #3 from Shilpa BN ---
Created attachment 40052
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40052&action=edit
Error screenshot
This image contains the command ran against the project and the error received.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
POI's Gradle build uses docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/toolchains.html to
manage being able to build the module-info classes even if the build is run
with Java 8. Basically, Gradle will find on
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INFORMATIONPROVIDED
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729
Shilpa BN changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shilpa...@gmail.com
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729
Bug ID: 69729
Summary: Unable to build POI 5.4.1 with JDK 8
Product: POI
Version: 5.4.1-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69727
Matafagafo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matafag...@gmail.com
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69726
Jacobo Aragunde Pérez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69727
Bug ID: 69727
Summary: XSSFSheet Wrong count when call removeMergedRegion and
addMergedRegion
Product: POI
Version: 5.4.1-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69726
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
these "org.openxmlformats.schemas..." classes are in poi-ooxml-lite and
poi-ooxml-full jars
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.poi/poi-ooxml-lite
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69726
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69726
Bug ID: 69726
Summary: Error: class CTTblStylePr not found
Product: POI
Version: 5.4.1-FINAL
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69723
Bug ID: 69723
Summary: Self
Product: POI
Version: 5.4.x-dev
Hardware: All
OS: OpenBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69720
Bug ID: 69720
Summary: Paragraph alignment value defaults to left, null not
allowed
Product: POI
Version: 5.4.x-dev
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69718
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
Unfortunately, POI is a volunteer project and at this stage, if you want a fix,
you are best off considering submitting it yourself.
I give this answer all the time - so I have done a doc to summarise the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69718
Matafagafo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matafag...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69718
--- Comment #1 from parvathyskumar...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 40050
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40050&action=edit
In this attachment K6 is empty but excel evaluates the formula of A1 whereas
POI d
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69718
Bug ID: 69718
Summary: xval if not specified is giving error instead of
taking a default value
Product: POI
Version: 5.4.1-FINAL
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69697
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
current fix only allows one optional space before the AM/PM part
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|PC |All
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Allow custom|Allow custom
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
--- Comment #10 from PJ Fanning ---
I have merged the PR and have tidied up the ThreadLocal to call remove when
nulls are in play.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
--- Comment #9 from Attila Kelemen ---
Some notes on your current implementation:
- I cannot restore the strategy of my caller. The simplest change you can do to
allow this is to return the previous strategy in
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
--- Comment #8 from Attila Kelemen ---
My issue with your implementation is that I cannot restore the previous
implementation to avoid changing the strategy to the caller (and also cannot
cleanup garbage manually).
In the mean time I also
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
--- Comment #7 from PJ Fanning ---
I added some changes to TempFile to allow a thread specific strategy.
https://github.com/apache/poi/commit/9c08d29fcbd0f3f4fec5f27349246bf6a84fe78a
and
https://github.com/apache/poi/commit
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
--- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning ---
Ok. If the change can be kept to your approx 30 lines, I will review it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
--- Comment #5 from Attila Kelemen ---
In fact, I just checked, it is literally just 30 lines of extra code (pretty
much trivial) containing one extra public method, with 2 modified lines
(replacing `strategy` with `getStrategy()` within
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
--- Comment #4 from Attila Kelemen ---
I don't really see how my "middle ground" proposal is a drastic change. It
would just declare a thread local, and if the thread local value is set, then
would use that strategy. That would
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
I am against big new temp file API changes.
You can plug in your own strategy using
https://poi.apache.org/apidocs/dev/org/apache/poi/util/TempFile.html#setTempFileCreationStrategy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
--- Comment #2 from Attila Kelemen ---
I think POI's mistaken assumption here is that what uses tmp files and what
doesn't is an implementation detail, but tmp file usage has very important
implications (mainly security and quota)
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69715
--- Comment #6 from Attila Kelemen ---
As promised in #823, I have created a PR which fixes this:
https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/824
As a side effect, the race conditions in the implementations are also fixed.
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69715
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
The changes I made are
https://github.com/apache/poi/commit/c5ca5ae0657250669349304d5a0ddf1f601656a3
and
https://github.com/apache/poi/commit/c5df00b0a785d47bea08c4e6d03e4d4c5696b0c3
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69715
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
I repeat that POI is a low level lib. If orgs can't ensure that dirs are not
deleted, then they have severe internal problems that I don't care about it.
Orgs like this can plug in their own more c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69715
--- Comment #3 from Attila Kelemen ---
It is not just malicious 3rd party though. A directory can be deleted by
accident, and then poi will mistakenly start writing to a directory where it
was not supposed to.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69715
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
I've added some commits to be strict in the constructor. If you provide a
non-null file, it must refer to a directory that already exists. This should
stop the scenario where the code will fallback t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69715
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69715
Bug ID: 69715
Summary: DefaultTempFileCreationStrategy forgets the originally
set directory, if it doesn't exist
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardwar
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
Bug ID: 69714
Summary: Allow custom TempFileCreationStrategy per document
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69697
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
I added
https://github.com/apache/poi/commit/c01228c331fce2743e1434ebdea31b895615b41d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69688
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
1 - 100 of 3595 matches
Mail list logo
