[Bug 66400] It is hoped that the log framework will be replaced by slf4j instead of log4j.

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66400 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED OS

[Bug 66400] New: It is hoped that the log framework will be replaced by slf4j instead of log4j.

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66400 Bug ID: 66400 Summary: It is hoped that the log framework will be replaced by slf4j instead of log4j. Product: POI Version: 5.2.2-FINAL Hardware: PC Status

[Bug 66399] New: Textruns not honouring highlight

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66399 Bug ID: 66399 Summary: Textruns not honouring highlight Product: POI Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Mac OS X 10.1 Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 66397] [PATCH] fix doc of createTempFile in TempFile and improve file operation with Java NIO

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning

[Bug 66397] [PATCH] fix doc of createTempFile in TempFile and improve file operation with Java NIO

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397 lsq27 changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38453|Patch file generated by ant |patch.tar.gz generated by description

[Bug 66397] New: [PATCH] fix doc of createTempFile in TempFile and improve file operation with Java NIO

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397 Bug ID: 66397 Summary: [PATCH] fix doc of createTempFile in TempFile and improve file operation with Java NIO Product: POI Version: 5.3.x-dev Hardware: PC

[Bug 66394] Implement validator

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394 --- Comment #3 from sfis...@gmail.com --- depending on their pipeline, it should be possible to wrap the binary with a JNI call interface if it needs to be embedded in a java execution context. additionally, C# and java are close enough that

[Bug 66394] Implement validator

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394 --- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning --- In a Microservices architecture, you can run some services in .NET and some in Java - so you could have a web service that uses Open XML SDK to validate files - while also having Java based web services that

[Bug 66394] Implement validator

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394 --- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning --- I'm afraid that noone is likely to volunteer to write this. POI is not the Java equivalent of Open XML SDK. POI is an OSS volunteer project. Open XML SDK appears to be built by Microsoft employees wh

[Bug 66394] New: Implement validator

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394 Bug ID: 66394 Summary: Implement validator Product: POI Version: 5.2.2-FINAL Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority

[Bug 66389] POI formula eval result is not same with excel when do an arithmetic operation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66389 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning

[Bug 66389] New: POI formula eval result is not same with excel when do an arithmetic operation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66389 Bug ID: 66389 Summary: POI formula eval result is not same with excel when do an arithmetic operation Product: POI Version: 5.2.2-FINAL Hardware: PC Status

[Bug 66319] Cell.getCellComment or Cell.removeCellComment cause specific excel fail to write

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning

[Bug 66278] Bug with multiple gradient stops at the exact same location causing a rendering failure (AWT -> not enough colors in gradient)

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66278 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66361] Start writing file header early for browser download progress

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66361 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning

[Bug 66379] XSLFTextRun does not correctly honour styling applied at cell level in tables

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66379 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 66383] hs_err_pid.log : a fatal error about SEGV_MAPERR has been detected by JVM, which caused the jvm crash

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66383 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|major Status|NEW

[Bug 66383] hs_err_pid.log : a fatal error about SEGV_MAPERR has been detected by JVM, which caused the jvm crash

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66383 --- Comment #1 from Nick Burch --- As a general rule, Java code shouldn't be able to crash the JVM like this, but it's the JVM's responsibility to ensure that You likely need to report this to your JVM supplier, assuming

[Bug 66383] New: hs_err_pid.log : a fatal error about SEGV_MAPERR has been detected by JVM, which caused the jvm crash

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66383 Bug ID: 66383 Summary: hs_err_pid.log : a fatal error about SEGV_MAPERR has been detected by JVM, which caused the jvm crash Product: POI Version: unspecified Hardware

[Bug 66379] XSLFTextRun does not correctly honour styling applied at cell level in tables

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66379 Gareth Floodgate changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|XSLFTextRun does not|XSLFTextRun does not

[Bug 66379] XSLFTextRun does not correctly honour styling applied a cell level in tables

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66379 --- Comment #2 from Gareth Floodgate --- Created attachment 38447 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38447&action=edit after -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Bug 66379] XSLFTextRun does not correctly honour styling applied a cell level in tables

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66379 --- Comment #1 from Gareth Floodgate --- Created attachment 38446 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38446&action=edit before -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Bug 66379] New: XSLFTextRun does not correctly honour styling applied a cell level in tables

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66379 Bug ID: 66379 Summary: XSLFTextRun does not correctly honour styling applied a cell level in tables Product: POI Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS

[Bug 66377] New: The x coordinate value of the anchor point in the lower right corner of the image exceeds the width value of the cell

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66377 Bug ID: 66377 Summary: The x coordinate value of the anchor point in the lower right corner of the image exceeds the width value of the cell Product: POI

[Bug 66371] BaseXSSFEvaluationWorkbook.getName(String,sheetIndex) should return the name from the sheet scope first

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66371 --- Comment #3 from Arseniy --- The existing code should be changed anyway. Now it makes unnecessary call of getName(name, -1) at the end. There is no need in this call because nameSheetindex == -1 already considered few lines above. -- You

[Bug 66371] BaseXSSFEvaluationWorkbook.getName(String,sheetIndex) should return the name from the sheet scope first

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66371 --- Comment #2 from Arseniy --- I can not because the problem found in a code which creates names in a new document (not saved on disk). The code creates global name for some a cells in a row and then the same name for the similar set of cells

[Bug 66371] BaseXSSFEvaluationWorkbook.getName(String,sheetIndex) should return the name from the sheet scope first

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66371 --- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning --- Can you provide an xlsx with a cell formula that demos the issue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66371] BaseXSSFEvaluationWorkbook.getName(String,sheetIndex) should return the name from the sheet scope first

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66371 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|PC |All -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 66371] BaseXSSFEvaluationWorkbook.getName(String,sheetIndex) should return the name from the sheet scope first

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66371 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Mac OS X 10.1 |All -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 66371] BaseXSSFEvaluationWorkbook.getName(String,sheetIndex) should return the name from the sheet scope first

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66371 Arseniy changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P1 Component|SS Common

[Bug 66371] New: BaseXSSFEvaluationWorkbook.getName(String,sheetIndex) should return the name from the sheet scope first

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66371 Bug ID: 66371 Summary: BaseXSSFEvaluationWorkbook.getName(String,sheetIndex) should return the name from the sheet scope first Product: POI Version: 5.2.2-FINAL Hardware

[Bug 66365] [PATCH] getStringCellValue returns an index in shared strings instead of value

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Mac OS X 10.1 |All Status|NEW

[Bug 66365] [PATCH] getStringCellValue returns an index in shared strings instead of value

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365 --- Comment #6 from Espen Amble Kolstad --- Wow that's impressive response-time \o/ Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ---

[Bug 66365] [PATCH] getStringCellValue returns an index in shared strings instead of value

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365 --- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning --- and test (r1905574) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

[Bug 66365] [PATCH] getStringCellValue returns an index in shared strings instead of value

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365 --- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning --- also added r1905572 (XSSFExcelExtractor) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e

[Bug 66365] [PATCH] getStringCellValue returns an index in shared strings instead of value

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365 --- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning --- Thanks - added with r1905571 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev

[Bug 66363] XWPFDocument.insertTable doesn't work at all

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66363 --- Comment #3 from Nigel Gay --- Tried with latest JARs from Jenkins and find no difference. I think its just not intended to be used the way I am expecting to be able to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Bug 66365] [PATCH] getStringCellValue returns an index in shared strings instead of value

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365 Espen Amble Kolstad changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|getStringCellValue returns |[PATCH] getStringCellValue

[Bug 66365] getStringCellValue returns an index in shared strings instead of value

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365 Espen Amble Kolstad changed: What|Removed |Added CC||espenamblekols...@gmail.com

[Bug 66365] getStringCellValue returns an index in shared strings instead of value

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365 --- Comment #1 from agala...@gmail.com --- I posted a mistake in initial comment. What I wrote : we read a second row as "Alice" and "1". What should be: we read a second row as "Bob" and "1". -- You

[Bug 66365] getStringCellValue returns an index in shared strings instead of value

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365 agala...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |5.2.2-FINAL -- You are receiving

[Bug 66365] New: getStringCellValue returns an index in shared strings instead of value

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365 Bug ID: 66365 Summary: getStringCellValue returns an index in shared strings instead of value Product: POI Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Mac OS X

[Bug 66363] XWPFDocument.insertTable doesn't work at all

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66363 --- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning --- There are some unreleased changes in XWPF code, eg https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312 Would you be able to try the latest code? You can build jars from latest source code or you could get

[Bug 66363] XWPFDocument.insertTable doesn't work at all

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66363 Nigel Gay changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from Nigel Gay

[Bug 66363] New: XWPFDocument.insertTable doesn't work at all

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66363 Bug ID: 66363 Summary: XWPFDocument.insertTable doesn't work at all Product: POI Version: 5.2.2-FINAL Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug 66360] Row Span borders render not correctly working with RegionUtil

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66360 vincent.lelos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All Resolution

[Bug 66347] Add theme support to XWPF

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66347 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 66312] Inserting paragraph into table from cursor

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66306] [PATCH] Make XSLFDiagramGroupShape public

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66306 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66301] Add a method to properly write the header necessary for a MSG attachment

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 66181] Issue with VALUE function and how it handles empty text input

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66356] Unable to process Jar entry

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66356 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66361] New: Start writing file header early for browser download progress

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66361 Bug ID: 66361 Summary: Start writing file header early for browser download progress Product: POI Version: unspecified Hardware: PC Status: NEW

[Bug 66360] New: Row Span borders render not correctly working with RegionUtil

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66360 Bug ID: 66360 Summary: Row Span borders render not correctly working with RegionUtil Product: POI Version: 5.2.2-FINAL Hardware: PC Status: NEW

[Bug 66347] Add theme support to XWPF

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66347 --- Comment #5 from stephan.schwieb...@gmail.com --- Sorry, I should have mentioned that in the previous comment. I was considering a test for modifying a theme, but the "XWPFTheme" implementation is based on/aligned with th

[Bug 66356] Unable to process Jar entry

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66356 --- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning --- You also need log4j-api 2.18.0 if you use poi 5.2.3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To

[Bug 66356] Unable to process Jar entry

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66356 --- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning --- You are supposed to match up the version number. Use all 5.2.3 jars or all 3.9 jars but don't mix them. poi-ooxml-schemas is called poi-ooxml-lite in v5.2.3 (ie the jar name was changed). -- Yo

[Bug 66356] New: Unable to process Jar entry

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66356 Bug ID: 66356 Summary: Unable to process Jar entry Product: POI Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Mac OS X 10.1 Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 66347] Add theme support to XWPF

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66347 --- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning --- thanks - added with r1905374 Would it be possible to add a test where a new themes file is created in a docx file? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66347] Add theme support to XWPF

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66347 --- Comment #3 from stephan.schwieb...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 38435 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38435&action=edit Basic test for XWPF themes Added a small test case to verify that a theme can

[Bug 66335] PtypGuid 0x0048 is a linked property but is read from property file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335 Simon Wagner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66347] Add theme support to XWPF

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66347 --- Comment #2 from stephan.schwieb...@gmail.com --- Sure, I'll add some tests. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ---

[Bug 66347] Add theme support to XWPF

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66347 --- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning --- thanks - added with r1905344 Would it be possible to add more test coverage - for regression purposes? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66181] Issue with VALUE function and how it handles empty text input

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181 --- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning --- I added r1905308 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

[Bug 66181] Issue with VALUE function and how it handles empty text input

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181 Dominik Stadler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug 66347] New: Add theme support to XWPF

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66347 Bug ID: 66347 Summary: Add theme support to XWPF Product: POI Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Mac OS X 10.1 Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 66181] Issue with VALUE function and how it handles empty text input

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181 --- Comment #5 from Miłosz Rembisz --- Hi, I believe this change broke other related behaviour - referencing blank cell. Having empty cell A1 I whould expect formula "=VALUE(A1)" to evaluate to zero, instead it now retur

[Bug 65790] Consider integrating SparseBitSet into POI codebase

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65790 --- Comment #7 from Ricardo gomez --- Gracias -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

[Bug 66335] PtypGuid 0x0048 is a linked property but is read from property file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wagner --- So I refined my patch (since I found another bug with missing multi value property types) and created a pull request https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/396 There I included a msg file which proves the

[Bug 66337] In-Memory HSSF warns about missing SummaryInformation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337 nicolas.her...@emineo.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66337] In-Memory HSSF warns about missing SummaryInformation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337 --- Comment #7 from PJ Fanning --- I added r1905045 - thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

[Bug 66337] In-Memory HSSF warns about missing SummaryInformation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337 --- Comment #6 from nicolas.her...@emineo.ch --- NB. I didn't override readPropertySet(Class, String) because its private and only used twice. I think it would be rather difficult to write a test (static mocking of logger...) The only t

[Bug 66337] In-Memory HSSF warns about missing SummaryInformation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337 --- Comment #5 from nicolas.her...@emineo.ch --- Created attachment 38432 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38432&action=edit Proposed patch Proposed patch to not warn about missing property sets the first time (wh

[Bug 66337] In-Memory HSSF warns about missing SummaryInformation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337 --- Comment #4 from nicolas.her...@emineo.ch --- Thank you for your quick response! I'll give it a try tomorrow if I get on with the whole project setup... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for th

[Bug 66335] PtypGuid 0x0048 is a linked property but is read from property file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Component|HSMF|HMEF -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 63955] HMEFContentsExtractor fails to extract content from winmail.dat

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63955 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||66335 Referenced Bugs: https

[Bug 66335] PtypGuid 0x0048 is a linked property but is read from property file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||63955 --- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning

[Bug 66337] In-Memory HSSF warns about missing SummaryInformation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337 --- Comment #3 from Nick Burch --- Create shouldn't issue warnings about missing bits, that does seem like a bug I guess we should override readProperties and readPropertySet with a boolean for "being null is fine&q

[Bug 66337] In-Memory HSSF warns about missing SummaryInformation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337 --- Comment #2 from nicolas.her...@emineo.ch --- Hi Nick! Thanks for the explanation! I'm actually not using HSSFWorkbook#getBytes() directly, but using HSSFWorkbook#write(OutputStream). Unfortunately, if I use PoiDoc

[Bug 66337] In-Memory HSSF warns about missing SummaryInformation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337 --- Comment #1 from Nick Burch --- If you're creating a file from scratch, you may want to have the normal document properties setup. POIDocument.html#createInformationProperties-- will do that for you Also, calling HSSFWorkbook.get

[Bug 66337] New: In-Memory HSSF warns about missing SummaryInformation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337 Bug ID: 66337 Summary: In-Memory HSSF warns about missing SummaryInformation Product: POI Version: 5.2.2-FINAL Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW

[Bug 66335] PtypGuid 0x0048 is a linked property but is read from property file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wagner --- My goto example email contains sensitive information, which I can't share. What I can share is the portion of the __properties_version1.0: 0B 00 55 36 06 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00

[Bug 66335] PtypGuid 0x0048 is a linked property but is read from property file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335 --- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning --- Thanks Simon. Unfortunately, I think we need a regression test. Do you have a a file that reproduces the issue and perhaps some code that parses the file? You don't necessarily need to provide fully wo

[Bug 66335] PtypGuid 0x0048 is a linked property but is read from property file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335 --- Comment #2 from Simon Wagner --- Created attachment 38431 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38431&action=edit A patch to fix it I created the patch from the git source. I hope this works. -- You are receivi

[Bug 66335] PtypGuid 0x0048 is a linked property but is read from property file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |major OS

[Bug 66335] New: PtypGuid 0x0048 is a linked property but is read from property file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335 Bug ID: 66335 Summary: PtypGuid 0x0048 is a linked property but is read from property file Product: POI Version: unspecified Hardware: PC Status: NEW

[Bug 66301] Add a method to properly write the header necessary for a MSG attachment

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301 --- Comment #10 from PJ Fanning --- There are currently no plans for a formal POI release. They occur approximately every 6 months. Releases take quite a lot of volunteer effort. You can build your own jars if you need the latest fixes. One

[Bug 66301] Add a method to properly write the header necessary for a MSG attachment

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301 --- Comment #9 from lyn.ev...@netdocuments.com --- P.J. - Can you provide details for the remaining steps for this POI patch? I see that the patch is merged into `trunk` for GitHub. Is there a calendar documenting when the next

[Bug 66319] New: Cell.getCellComment or Cell.removeCellComment cause specific excel fail to write

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319 Bug ID: 66319 Summary: Cell.getCellComment or Cell.removeCellComment cause specific excel fail to write Product: POI Version: unspecified Hardware: PC Status

[Bug 66301] Add a method to properly write the header necessary for a MSG attachment

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301 --- Comment #8 from lyn.ev...@netdocuments.com --- (In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #7) > I'm afraid that changing the commit message is not really feasible. Understood. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assi

[Bug 66301] Add a method to properly write the header necessary for a MSG attachment

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301 --- Comment #7 from PJ Fanning --- I'm afraid that changing the commit message is not really feasible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for th

[Bug 66301] Add a method to properly write the header necessary for a MSG attachment

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301 --- Comment #6 from lyn.ev...@netdocuments.com --- (In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #5) > thanks - added r1904685 - I made a couple of small changes if you want to > review them Looks great. Is there a way to amend the commit messa

[Bug 66301] Add a method to properly write the header necessary for a MSG attachment

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301 --- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning --- thanks - added r1904685 - I made a couple of small changes if you want to review them -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66301] Add a method to properly write the header necessary for a MSG attachment

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301 --- Comment #4 from lyn.ev...@netdocuments.com --- Created attachment 38421 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38421&action=edit POI-Scratchpad HSMF patch #2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assig

[Bug 66312] Inserting paragraph into table from cursor

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312 --- Comment #7 from aoelle...@protonmail.com --- Ok, I will see what I can do, or whether I can find a viable path around it, thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66312] Inserting paragraph into table from cursor

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312 --- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning --- Honestly, POI XWPF performance is poor due to the overheads in XMLBeans. I'd prefer to get the code working than to worry about performance. In theory, the code can be tuned later - or overloaded me

[Bug 66312] Inserting paragraph into table from cursor

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312 --- Comment #5 from aoelle...@protonmail.com --- XWPFDocument:716 the element is unconditionally added to the paragraphs array. If it should be supported by apache poi, one would probably need to do a check on the parent type of the cursor to

[Bug 66312] Inserting paragraph into table from cursor

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312 --- Comment #4 from aoelle...@protonmail.com --- >From what I've seen in the patched code, the old paragraph doesn't get replaced, `document.getgetParagraph(0)` always has the same memory adress -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 66312] Inserting paragraph into table from cursor

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312 --- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning --- I added r1904563 - the test results are not as expected - I had to modify the broken test to get it to pass. Anton - could you debug the new code to see why it replaces the paragraph instead of adding one

[Bug 66312] Inserting paragraph into table from cursor

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312 --- Comment #2 from aoelle...@protonmail.com --- Sorry for the delay! https://github.com/AntonOellerer/test-poi-paragraph-insertion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

<    7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   >