https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #2 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Stadler ---
Thanks for the note, great news!
We already use fuzzing via Jazzer heavily to uncover unexpected failures, it
will be very interesting how much more a large-scale run on oss-fuzz will
provide.
FYI
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
Bug ID: 66425
Summary: Initial Integration of poi into oss-fuzz
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66422
Franz Seidl changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #2 from Franz Seidl
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66422
--- Comment #1 from Franz Seidl ---
Created attachment 38462
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38462=edit
example
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66422
Bug ID: 66422
Summary: WordExtractor.getParagraphText() - capitalized text
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66418
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Mac OS X 10.1 |All
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66418
--- Comment #2 from dan.r...@workday.com ---
Brilliant, I like your approach much better! I've played with it a bit and it
seems to be working well. I need to jump through some hoops before I can submit
a patch, but when I'm ready, would you
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48344
lsq27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|HSSF|POI Overall
Version|3.10-FINAL
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66418
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
Thanks Dan for raising the issue. It would be great if you or your colleagues
could come up with a patch because basically, POI is no longer very active
volunteer wise.
My thoughts are that this issue might
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66418
Bug ID: 66418
Summary: Performance/Scalability issue in XSSFSheet.groupRow
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: All
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48344
lsq27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38460|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48344
lsq27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lushaoqian...@gmail.com
--- Comment #17 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65543
--- Comment #6 from simon.car...@cloudpay.net ---
Thank you for accepting my patch so quickly.
For the record, I must have misinterpreted the Submitting Patches section in
https://poi.apache.org/devel/guidelines.html#SubmittingPatches
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66413
Bug ID: 66413
Summary: use HSSFColor index when setting fill color on cell
style
Product: POI
Version: 5.3.x-dev
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65543
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66399
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65543
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
Thanks for the patch - added with r1906434
For future reference, could you avoid creating 'patch' issues (first I've ever
heard of such a concept)? You can attach them to the original issue.
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65543
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon.car...@cloudpay.net
--- Comment #4
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66412
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65543
--- Comment #3 from simon.car...@cloudpay.net ---
Thanks. I've created a patch bug here:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66412
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66412
Bug ID: 66412
Summary: [PATCH] Support SST records with incorrect string
count not at the end of the stream
Product: POI
Version: 5.3.x-dev
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66407
Gilles GAIDO changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INFORMATIONPROVIDED
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66407
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
I don't know what that robotframework is in the stacktrace but with it you are
mixing Java and Python. The problem with frameworks like this is you can end up
with very complicated classloading. Maybe
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66407
Gilles GAIDO changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66407
--- Comment #3 from Gilles GAIDO ---
Created attachment 38459
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38459=edit
maven dependency tree
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66407
--- Comment #2 from Gilles GAIDO ---
Created attachment 38458
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38458=edit
full stacktrace
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65790
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65543
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
We are happy to review and merge patches.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66407
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INFORMATIONPROVIDED
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65543
--- Comment #1 from simon.car...@cloudpay.net ---
Hi,
We've also seen this issue. About 350 times in the last month.
The shared string table record reports more strings than are present in the
file. In one example ~4,500 when only ~1,350
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66407
Bug ID: 66407
Summary: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 'byte[]
org.apache.commons.io.IOUtils.byteArray(int)'
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66404
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Stadler ---
Please take a look at https://github.com/centic9/poi-on-android
It provides a complete sample project and contains some more necessary
workarounds that seem necessary to use Apache POI on Android
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66400
--- Comment #3 from sfis...@gmail.com ---
personally i'd advocate for JUL because it's vanilla, off the shelf, and
pluggable as well. but that would require someone doing the lifting and i
don't foresee that happening
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66400
--- Comment #2 from Axel Howind ---
Additional info: Recent versions of log4j2 provide a logging facade similar to
SLF4J and do not rely on a specific implementation. Please use any of the
available Log4j adapters to route logging
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66404
Axel Howind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INFORMATIONPROVIDED
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66404
--- Comment #1 from Axel Howind ---
It looks like proguard removes ressources needed by POI. It should be possible
to configure Proguard not to remove these ressources, but how to do this is
something you should ask the people at proguard
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66404
Bug ID: 66404
Summary: invoking an implementation of WorkBook crashes in
android project when proguard / r8 is enabled
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
Thanks - added with r1906238
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60912
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #3 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62272
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||54373
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54373
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||62272
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63168
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |LATER
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38453|application/x-gzip |application/x-gtar
mime
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65260
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66401
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397
lsq27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[PATCH] fix doc of |[PATCH] fix doc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397
lsq27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66230
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||65260
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65260
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||66230
--- Comment #3 from Dominik
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397
lsq27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38453|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64853
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60541
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brendan.buz...@kronos.com
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58910
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66204
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66260
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66263
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66303
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Stadler ---
Seems the reported issue is fixed by the changes, let's reopen or create new
issues if other files cause more issues.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66361
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66377
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailable
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66399
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66401
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Keywords
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66401
Bug ID: 66401
Summary: FormulaParser does not recognize sheet names
containing quotes
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66400
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66400
Bug ID: 66400
Summary: It is hoped that the log framework will be replaced by
slf4j instead of log4j.
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66399
Bug ID: 66399
Summary: Textruns not honouring highlight
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397
lsq27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38453|Patch file generated by ant |patch.tar.gz generated by
description
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397
Bug ID: 66397
Summary: [PATCH] fix doc of createTempFile in TempFile and
improve file operation with Java NIO
Product: POI
Version: 5.3.x-dev
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394
--- Comment #3 from sfis...@gmail.com ---
depending on their pipeline, it should be possible to wrap the binary with a
JNI call interface if it needs to be embedded in a java execution context.
additionally, C# and java are close enough
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
In a Microservices architecture, you can run some services in .NET and some in
Java - so you could have a web service that uses Open XML SDK to validate files
- while also having Java based web services
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
I'm afraid that noone is likely to volunteer to write this. POI is not the Java
equivalent of Open XML SDK. POI is an OSS volunteer project. Open XML SDK
appears to be built by Microsoft employees who
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394
Bug ID: 66394
Summary: Implement validator
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66389
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66389
Bug ID: 66389
Summary: POI formula eval result is not same with excel when do
an arithmetic operation
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66278
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66361
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66379
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66383
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|major
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66383
--- Comment #1 from Nick Burch ---
As a general rule, Java code shouldn't be able to crash the JVM like this, but
it's the JVM's responsibility to ensure that
You likely need to report this to your JVM supplier, assuming you're
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66383
Bug ID: 66383
Summary: hs_err_pid.log : a fatal error about SEGV_MAPERR has
been detected by JVM, which caused the jvm crash
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66379
Gareth Floodgate changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|XSLFTextRun does not|XSLFTextRun does
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66379
--- Comment #2 from Gareth Floodgate ---
Created attachment 38447
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38447=edit
after
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66379
--- Comment #1 from Gareth Floodgate ---
Created attachment 38446
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38446=edit
before
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66379
Bug ID: 66379
Summary: XSLFTextRun does not correctly honour styling applied
a cell level in tables
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66377
Bug ID: 66377
Summary: The x coordinate value of the anchor point in the
lower right corner of the image exceeds the width
value of the cell
Product: POI
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66371
--- Comment #3 from Arseniy ---
The existing code should be changed anyway. Now it makes unnecessary call of
getName(name, -1) at the end. There is no need in this call because
nameSheetindex == -1 already considered few lines above.
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66371
--- Comment #2 from Arseniy ---
I can not because the problem found in a code which creates names in a new
document (not saved on disk). The code creates global name for some a cells in
a row and then the same name for the similar set of cells
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66371
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
Can you provide an xlsx with a cell formula that demos the issue?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66371
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|PC |All
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66371
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Mac OS X 10.1 |All
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66371
Arseniy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
Component|SS Common
901 - 1000 of 21913 matches
Mail list logo