https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56205
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||64759
Referenced Bugs:
https://bz.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56205
Andreas Beeker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56205
Andreas Beeker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||64294
Referenced Bugs:
https://bz.a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56205
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
Hi Rathna,
We don't support Strict OOXML documents. See
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56205
franziska.her...@dvbern.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||franziska.her...@dvbern.ch
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56205
Aldrin Baroi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldrin.ba...@gmail.com
--
You are rece
See my post from last December about dropping Java 6 support.
http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/Java-6-support-td5721373.html
Unfortunately, might be stuck coding to Java 6 for a while. It sure would
be nice to use some of the language features from Java 8, as writing your
own *correct* ite
Just because this has come up, maybe it is coming close to time to make a
major revision. The XML schemas are old, and we are coding to Java 1.6. A
major version change would give us the ability to make some breaking
changes such as replacing XMLBeans, shifting to Java 8 (or even 9), and
shifting t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56205
Javen O'Neal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||58149
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56205
--- Comment #4 from Rathna ---
Created attachment 32894
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32894&action=edit
I have attached the MS Word 2013 for testing purpose.
Below link explains about the error.
http://apache-poi.1045
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56205
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailable
--
You are receiving
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56205
Andreas Beeker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31358|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56205
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Beeker ---
I thought about comparing the schemas, but the changes are substantially, so
that doesn't work.
So the next try was to check the poi examples and their output, XSSF and XSLF
looked ok, but XWPF has so
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56205
--- Comment #1 from Nick Burch ---
If we use the newer schemas, how does that change what we output? Will it mean
that the files we generate stop being compatible with older office versions?
How about input? Will it mean we stop being able
14 matches
Mail list logo