https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #31 from Andreas Beeker ---
Applied PJ Fannings pull request [1] via r1834165
[1] https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/113
Leaving it open until XmlBeans 3.0.0 is released
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assigne
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #30 from Andreas Beeker ---
I have some ideas of how JAXB could be integrated into POI, but currently even
the basics don't work.
If you want to have something to get started with, you could try to solve [1]
This would be only one
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #29 from Scott Coldwell ---
I'm happy to help with the actual conversion when it comes time for that. My
company just went through a pretty large xmlbeans -> JAXB conversion involving
many 3rd party schemas in various states of sch
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||578372...@qq.com
--- Comment #28 from PJ
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||da...@mobile-360.com
--- Comment #27
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||61949
Referenced Bugs:
https://bz.apach
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prabinshr007...@gmail.com
--- Commen
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #25 from PJ Fanning ---
I found some other projects based on POI, that have some usage of spreadsheetml
classes. I raised issues in these projects.
https://github.com/norbert-radyk/spoiwo/issues/28
https://github.com/monitorjbl/exce
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #24 from Greg Woolsey ---
Another complication is that none of the replacement technologies that have
been discussed so far can handle the arbitrary XML allowed as "extensions" in
the OOXML spec. One benefit of XMLBeans is that it k
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #23 from Nick Burch ---
(In reply to Scott Coldwell from comment #22)
> I think the more appropriate course of action would be to remove xmlbeans as
> a dependency. The project was terminated over 4 years ago.
Removing XMLBeans is
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #22 from scott.coldw...@hrworx.com ---
I think the more appropriate course of action would be to remove xmlbeans as a
dependency. The project was terminated over 4 years ago.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the ass
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l_alexandra2...@yahoo.com
--- Commen
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sakurot...@gmail.com
--- Comment #20
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||61494
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||58247
Referenced Bugs:
https://bz.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||54084
Depends on|54084
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #18 from PJ Fanning ---
I agree that getting an official apache xmlbeans patch done is preferable to
having people use my forked jar. This jar solves some issues with writing XSSF
workbooks that have unicode surrogate chars.
I have
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #17 from Nick Burch ---
I think best practice would be to speak with the Attic PMC about this
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #16 from Dominik Stadler ---
Thanks for the work, I have tested it a bit and so far it looks quite good.
One thing we could try is to remove the stax-api dependency from the Maven
deployment, I don't think this is still necessary
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #15 from PJ Fanning ---
I added a fix for the duplicate classes in
https://github.com/pjfanning/xmlbeans - I will publish a 2.6.2 jar in the
coming days if there are no other xmlbeans issues to fix.
Feel free to highlight any issue
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #14 from PJ Fanning ---
My jar has the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-499 issue with
duplicate ReferenceResolver classes. I'll see if I can work out what in the
xmlbeans build is causing this.
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #13 from Nick Burch ---
It'd be good to go through the xmlbeans bugzilla, and see if there are any
other bug fix patches there that'd be worth including in a fix release.
(Not to mention the duplicated classes in the 2.6.0 binary j
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #12 from PJ Fanning ---
I have published a patched version of xmlbeans to Maven Central.
com.github.pjfanning:xmlbeans:2.6.1
I have a sample that shows the patched jar in action at
https://github.com/pjfanning/poi-xmlbeans-patch-te
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #11 from PJ Fanning ---
Do we think it would be possible to issue an xmlbeans patch based on the
changes I've made in github?
The longer term solution is probably to replace xmlbeans.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #10 from PJ Fanning ---
I made a change on a fork that I have of xmlbeans and it allows the
testBug54084Unicode to pass
(https://github.com/pjfanning/xmlbeans/commit/b4dda3837421835b7a378c4ab83ce48a4c49fe59).
I have other branches
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #9 from PJ Fanning ---
I had a little trouble building xmlbeans so I made some small changes and
committed them to https://github.com/pjfanning/xmlbeans.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #8 from Dominik Stadler ---
We also see some bugs related to Unicode handling inside XmlBeans, these are
also candidates for this effort, see e.g. bug 54084.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||54084
Referenced Bugs:
https://bz.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
Kurt Huwig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kurthu...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #7 from Dominik Stadler ---
*** Bug 59195 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||59428
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #5 from Dominik Stadler ---
The javax... classes are actually included via the stax-api dependency of
XMLBeans. This one should probably simply be removed together with depending on
Java 6 or higher.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #4 from Dominik Stadler ---
there are a few commits on trunk after 2.6.0 that might be interesting here:
*
https://github.com/apache/xmlbeans/commit/4e918d97a03f6aa4355a4580933dca9bf23e80a0
*
https://github.com/apache/xmlbeans/comm
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|59195 |
Blocks|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #3 from Dominik Stadler ---
Another thing that we can look at: bug 55149 - "Usage of XmlBeans triggers
"clearThreadLocalMap" warnings"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Stadler ---
Bonus points for looking at the following locking issue as well:
http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/Alternative-Replacement-for-xmlbeans-tt5722053.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Stadler ---
Comment from Nick in bug #59195: "Maybe we could get together with Tika and
Lucene, and ask the Attic PMC to let us put together a 2.6.1 release with the
packaging fix and some others, if someone fancies
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||59195
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||58925
--
You are receiving this mai
40 matches
Mail list logo
