Re: [VOTE] Apache Polaris - Zulip Project Chat Bylaws

2024-09-06 Thread Russell Spitzer
To be clear I am +1 on this intent I just want to adjust the wording, I'll put my suggestions on the PR On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 9:51 AM Russell Spitzer wrote: > I just worry about the wording under content moderation, the first line > says we aren't moderating but we are as it applies to the Apac

Re: [VOTE] Apache Polaris - Zulip Project Chat Bylaws

2024-09-06 Thread Russell Spitzer
I just worry about the wording under content moderation, the first line says we aren't moderating but we are as it applies to the Apache COC as noted on the third line. ``` - User content in any form is not moderated. - The (P)PMC reserves the right to remove/delete commercial adver

Re: [VOTE] Apache Polaris - Zulip Project Chat Bylaws

2024-09-06 Thread Dmitri Bourlatchkov
+1 (nb) Cheers, Dmitri. On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 5:47 AM Robert Stupp wrote: > Hi all, > > Although there seems to be consensus on the proposal, I think it is good > to have a formal vote, since this is a bylaws document. > > I've opened a PR [1] to add the Chat Bylaws as a markdown document to >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Automatic dependency management

2024-09-06 Thread Robert Stupp
Looks like there's a consensus to introduce Renovate, so I've updated the PR https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/267 as "Ready for Review". On 05.09.24 16:15, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: +1 to Renovate. It works well in Nessie and it is quite convenient in terms of GH integration. Cheers, D

[VOTE] Apache Polaris - Zulip Project Chat Bylaws

2024-09-06 Thread Robert Stupp
Hi all, Although there seems to be consensus on the proposal, I think it is good to have a formal vote, since this is a bylaws document. I've opened a PR [1] to add the Chat Bylaws as a markdown document to the Polaris repository. The text is identical to the original google doc proposal [2]