I really dislike Zulip. I find it hard to use and for me all my other chats
I have to belong to are Slack for example ASF Slack and most importantly
for Polaris, the Iceberg slack. I originally didn’t have strong objections
because I hadn’t used Zulip and I was willing to try it out, but I probably
Hi
I think it should have gone via secur...@apache.org just to avoid public
security discussion.
Anyway that makes sense.
Regards
JB
Le sam. 7 déc. 2024 à 19:37, Robert Stupp a écrit :
> Generally I agree. Compromising security is not an option - ever.
>
> > On 7. Dec 2024, at 00:16, Michael
Is this an issue with short-lived credentials with the recent additions to
return and refresh credentials via Iceberg REST?
> On 7. Dec 2024, at 00:16, Michael Collado wrote:
>
> Hey folks
>
> Someone pinged about https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/389 yesterday
> and I thought it was wort
If monitoring the Polaris channel in Iceberg slack is too much work (I
personally don’t monitor it), then we should direct users to the official
Apache Polaris Zulip chat.
There were no strong objections against Zulip particularly strong arguments for
Slack voiced during the initial discussion
Generally I agree. Compromising security is not an option - ever.
> On 7. Dec 2024, at 00:16, Michael Collado wrote:
>
> Hey folks
>
> Someone pinged about https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/389 yesterday
> and I thought it was worth bringing up for discussion.
>
> On-prem s3 compat sounds
