I agree, unfortunately, with you Niclas.
[x] +1, I concur, Polygene should be moved to Attic
[ ] -1, I think Polygene should continue and I am willing to put in the work to
keep this project alive
BR,
- Stanislav Muhametsin
Sent from TypeApp
On Nov 26, 2018, 06:17, at 06:17, Niclas
Hi Niclas,
It's sad to hear these news. I agree with you on on the "falling back to
the grind of doing a lot of monotonous work manually" point. I recently
started work on Java-related project, where coincidentally Hadoop and
microservices are at the core of the system, and the grind you menti
Damnit, today I am working at one company during the day, and then right after
that at evening got a meeting at another company. So definetly won't be able to
attend. :(
Would love to hear some brief info about current state of Polygene, if possible.
Sent from TypeApp
On Feb 26, 2018, 04:56
olumn )
>>.column( modifiedColumn )
>>.column( createdColumn )
>>.execute();
>> } );
>> }
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Kent Sølvsten
>> wrote:
>>
>>> What do you mean
I have had extremely busy time lately with new apartment (renovating,
moving in, etc).
Still not completely finished, so I won't be able to participate today,
sorry about that.
Next month should be fine though. :)
On 18.9.2017 17:20, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Showing up?
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 4
dentity varchar null,
_table_name varchar null, _created_at timestamp null, _modified_at
timestamp null);
On 11.9.2017 11:58, Stanislav Muhametsin wrote:
This is quite puzzling, and I have no answer to this, other than it is
most likely something JOOQ-related, as the statements *should* work.
M
ived, so I know it actually tries to put it in there.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:03 AM, Stanislav Muhametsin
<mailto:stanislav.muhamet...@zest.mail.kapsi.fi>> wrote:
When I run the following code in PgAdmin's SQL window, it succeeds:
create schema "POLYGENE&quo
When I run the following code in PgAdmin's SQL window, it succeeds:
create schema "POLYGENE";
create table if not exists "POLYGENE"."TYPES"("_identity" varchar null,
"_table_name" varchar null, "_created_at" timestamp null, "_modified_at"
timestamp null);
("Query returned successfully with no re
I, for one, can't decipher the message.
My best bet on what is going on is that apparently this person is
claiming that Apache Polygene is his/hers product (???).
There are all kind of people out there in the world - I'd say ignore
this one, for now at least.
Judging from the email address, an
I think eager designer is very strong argument as well.
Personally, I liked #70 and #78 most (unfortunately didn't have time to
vote).
However, #63 is also very good - I think it will suit its job well. :)
On 26/07/2017 20:09, Paul Merlin wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr: I prefer #63 (and #83)
Yeah, b
Since I don't have a Java environment set up, I go for:
[x] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok
On 20.7.2017 13:16, Paul Merlin wrote:
+ Downloaded source distro
+ Validated source distro signature (well, it's mine so that was easy)
+ Built from source distro
+ Cons
as Hedhman
- Tibor Mlynarik
- Stanislav Muhametsin (no cam/mic)
Tibor came with a list of things, after trying to port his 2.x application
to 3.x
* @Uses disallowing Composites breaks his app. And it worked before. I
realized from his feedback that I forbade a much wider usecase than the one
that is
My ancient code, I think.
Probably a brain fart, or some "preliminary version here and I fix it
later" and 'later' never happened. :D
Too many years has passed to remember the actual reason.
But yeah, it is definetly not working for multiple types...
The last group should be probably:
{([^},]+
hat you guys are currently facing in Java.
Cheers
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Stanislav Muhametsin <
stanislav.muhamet...@zest.mail.kapsi.fi> wrote:
FWIW, I really had to sit down and think a lot about all concurrency etc
issues in C# version of Polygene.
There, I am using Compare
I've actually got something similar to this, where I was running code in
separate AppDomain (kind of like ClassLoader in Java) in .NET
application, and it when it threw exception from inner AppDomain, it
couldn't serialize it in AppDomain boundary, resulting in similar
situation. :D
On 09/06/
FWIW, I really had to sit down and think a lot about all concurrency etc
issues in C# version of Polygene.
There, I am using CompareExchange-based algorithms to simulate state
machine:
0 - Initial
1 - Activating
2 - Active
3 - Passivating
4 - Passive
Legal transitions are:
0 -> 1 (Initial activ
Hi,
I am thankful for this invitation, and I accept it.
Hopefully I'll be of assistance!
On 05/06/2017 20:10, Paul Merlin wrote:
Stanislav,
The PMC is pleased to invite you to the Project Management Committee of
the Apache Polygene project.
The current list of PMC Members are;
Alex Karas
I envy a bit your better and warmer environment, it's May and still tops
+5 right now here. :(
Regarding the blog post:
- Good content and writing, and good intro
- The photo of the island could be made more precise (less pixelated,
at least on my screen (2560x1440) the pixels are clearly vis
I agree with JJ here, but SQL-leads-Polygene approach is extremely hard
to do, considering that creating SQL indexing store to fully support all
stuff that Polygene query engine does is quite demanding already.
But I'm not saying it is impossible - hardly anything is. :)
And it's good that Nicla
Hi Niclas,
Sounds fine to me! I am currently in Lapland on holiday, and limited to my
mobile phone. So if you guys could do it, I would appreciate it. :)
-Original Message-
From: "Niclas Hedhman"
Sent: 14/04/2017 07:05
To: "dev@polygene.apache.org"
Subject: Dependencies
Stan,
I am
I like the idea, and also the frequency and time seems ok.
I'll try to appear in the next meeting! :)
On 11.4.2017 18:12, Paul Merlin wrote:
+1000
It was good to chit chat.
Once a month sounds good to me.
Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
Gang,
yesterday, Paul, Jiri and I, suddenly launched an informa
On 11.4.2017 13:45, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Also, Stan, I really appreciate that you still care about this...
Thanks Niclas! :)
Of course I care, Polygene was the thing that really helped me to "open
my eyes" in many programming aspects, and I love to give back, although
right now it's very s
ndexing-rdf and indexing-elasticsearch, but I am not convinced that
it does the wrong thing.. basically checking "these primitive types and
ValueComposites are allowed"... which seems rational enough to me.
Cheers
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Stanislav Muhametsin <
stanislav.muhamet.
hope that other test cases are failing for same
reason.
Cheers
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Niclas Hedhman
wrote:
Thanks, I will try to dig into this. Worst case, we take
indexing-sql off
the release specification.
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Stanislav Muhametsin <
stanislav.muham
concluded that it was more work than fit
into 3.0 plan. But I would be really happy to get to a situation where we
have "ES backed indexer", which would help a lot going forward. The RDF
implementation is also getting "old"...
Cheers
Niclas
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Stan
Hi!
Hmm yeah, it's been quite a while since I wrote that beast. :D I would
do a lot of things differently now, but I guess we are stuck with what
we have (until someone rewrites that).
There was a discussion in October 2016, and I am not sure if the issue
discussed then has been resolved, or
26 matches
Mail list logo
