[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16631407#comment-16631407
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PIO-167:
Github user takezoe commented on a diff in the pull
Github user takezoe commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/472#discussion_r221150494
--- Diff: docs/manual/source/community/projects.html.md ---
@@ -29,79 +29,45 @@ and submit a pull request.
## SDKs
-Community-power
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16631195#comment-16631195
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PIO-170:
Github user takezoe commented on the issue:
ht
Github user takezoe commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/470
@dszeto Thanks!
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Szeto updated PIO-173:
-
Labels: newbie (was: )
> pio run pio-assembly jar with Right
> ---
>
>
Hi all,
I have started a very rough draft on rearchitecting PredictionIO to be more
modular and flexible with a backward compatible mindset. The initial draft
is at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/13uoEMeLFa-EqW4ezr6pmbA7DtydueHhVjMgTm1VMok0/edit?usp=sharing.
More details will be added over tim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16630928#comment-16630928
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PIO-168:
Github user EmergentOrder commented on the issue:
Github user EmergentOrder commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/466
Fixed the conflicts. I agree, looked like a transient error.
Ready to merge, pending the next build.
---
Wei Chen created PIO-178:
Summary: Close Irrelevant PRs on GitHub
Key: PIO-178
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-178
Project: PredictionIO
Issue Type: Task
Components: Document
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Szeto closed PIO-167.
Resolution: Fixed
> Official Website Document Minor Bug Fix
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Szeto reassigned PIO-167:
Assignee: Wei Chen
> Official Website Document Minor Bug Fix
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16630868#comment-16630868
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PIO-167:
Github user dszeto commented on the issue:
htt
Github user dszeto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/472
LGTM. Merging. Thanks!
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Szeto resolved PIO-153.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.14.0
> Update PMC.md to use gnu-tar
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16630823#comment-16630823
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PIO-170:
Github user dszeto commented on the issue:
htt
Github user dszeto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/470
+1 from me
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16630813#comment-16630813
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PIO-168:
Github user dszeto commented on the issue:
htt
Github user dszeto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/466
@EmergentOrder is this ready to merge? I was waiting for build to pass but
it looks like a transient error to me. Do you mind resolving the conflicts? It
should trigger a new build.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16630735#comment-16630735
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PIO-153:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/469
---
Github user EmergentOrder commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/466
Actually, scratch that, apps won't continue to work, although the indices
will. We could add a fallback to the old indices in the code, but I think we
should prefer to advise users to rec
Github user dszeto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/471#discussion_r219938608
--- Diff: docs/manual/source/install/index.html.md.erb ---
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ limitations under the License.
It is **very important** to meet the min
Github user dszeto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/466
I think we should provide a migration tool if possible. I will file another
ticket for that.
---
Github user dszeto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/471#discussion_r219937276
--- Diff: build.sbt ---
@@ -17,24 +17,7 @@
import PIOBuild._
lazy val scalaSparkDepsVersion = Map(
--- End diff --
Maybe we
Github user dszeto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/471
Merging. Thank you!
---
Github user dszeto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/471#discussion_r220067887
--- Diff: docs/manual/source/install/index.html.md.erb ---
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ limitations under the License.
It is **very important** to meet the min
Github user shimamoto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/467
I fixed it!
---
GitHub user Wei-1 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/472
[PIO-167] Move Old Docs to Archived
In this PR:
- Fix one link in A Quick Intro
- Remove out of date community projects
- Remove out of date demos
- Change install links based
Github user takezoe commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/471#discussion_r220019061
--- Diff: docs/manual/source/install/index.html.md.erb ---
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ limitations under the License.
It is **very important** to meet the mi
Github user EmergentOrder commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/466
If users want to update to 6.X without the possibility to create new apps,
but with existing apps preserved, they can use ES migration and PIO 0.13.0.
---
Github user EmergentOrder commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/466
Actually, according to the docs, existing indices, and so apps, should
continue to work in 6.X (but will be disallowed in 7.X). I assume there is a
documented ES migration process. There
Github user takezoe commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/471
@dszeto Nice catch! I removed the file.
---
Github user shimamoto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/467
@dszeto Sure! You mean you want me to add the step that creates a next
version after a release?
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/471
---
Github user marevol commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/462
It's okay to merge this PR.
For a release procedure, I'll file a new issue on JIRA and update PMC.md.
---
Github user dszeto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/471
We should also update `bin/pio-class` to require Spark 2.0.0+. It is
currently set to 1.6.3.
---
Github user takezoe commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/471
I added Spark 2.0.2 / Hadoop 2.6.5 test patterns and updated Spark version
in `bin/pio-class.sh` and
`tools/src/main/scala/org/apache/predictionio/tools/commands/Management.scala`.
---
Github user dszeto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/471
@takezoe Looks great. I have no further comments. Thank you!
---
Github user dszeto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/467
LGTM. Merging. Thank you!
---
Github user dszeto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/462
@marevol Is there further updates to this PR? Is this ready for merging?
---
Github user dszeto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/471
Just stumbled upon
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/blob/develop/data/src/main/spark-1/org/apache/predictionio/data/SparkVersionDependent.scala.
We probably should clean this up as well.
Github user takezoe commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/471#discussion_r220017782
--- Diff: build.sbt ---
@@ -17,24 +17,7 @@
import PIOBuild._
lazy val scalaSparkDepsVersion = Map(
--- End diff --
Yes, but
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/467
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16630650#comment-16630650
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PIO-170:
Github user takezoe commented on the issue:
ht
Github user takezoe commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/470
@shimamoto Can you take a look?
---
Thanks for your interest Yogi! How about
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-174? It would get you familiarize
with several aspects of PIO.
Regards,
Donald
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 4:41 PM Yogi Nadkarni
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a PIO newbie as well, and am looking forward to contributing to th
Takako Shimamoto created PIO-177:
Summary: Add scripts to help with preparing releases
Key: PIO-177
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-177
Project: PredictionIO
Issue Type: Improv
Thanks Donald [:-)] ,
I will start working on it.
On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 11:34 -0700, Donald Szeto wrote:
Hi Saurabh,
Thank you for your interest! There is a small task for you to get ramped
up. Do you want to pick up https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-176?
Regards,
Donald
On Wed, S
48 matches
Mail list logo
