[GitHub] incubator-predictionio issue #274: pio train error

GitHub user birdspring opened an issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/issues/274 pio train error "pio build" is successfully executed on my machine. But when I tried "pio train", an error occurred to me, the log is as follows: [INFO] [Engine] Extracting d

Re: 0.10.0 release

Thanks for the clarification. I could have phrased that better too. Not meant to sound abrasive. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > I don’t expect you to know where Simon is, I was just seeing if anyone on > the list knew, some are relatives and friends of his and even work at

Re: 0.10.0 release

I don’t expect you to know where Simon is, I was just seeing if anyone on the list knew, some are relatives and friends of his and even work at the same location. I’m pretty sure Simon has the answers to take us to the SGA or get one created. Not trying to dump work on you Andy, just trying to

Re: 0.10.0 release

As I explained on the INFRA JIRA Pat I'm quite clear what was granted and if it's not already in an Apache repo it was not granted by that SGA. Sure, Simon would be a reasonable place to start for a new SGA discussion. I have no idea what he's up to, I'm not his keeper. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:

Re: 0.10.0 release

AFAIK Salesforce owns the code and Simon must have filled out the original PIO grant, which may cover all the templates already. He also started this discussion so I think we start with Simon unless someone knows better. Is he on vacation? On Aug 16, 2016, at 3:30 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:

Re: 0.10.0 release

I see that Pat filed INFRA-12441 ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12441) which I read asks to import code from GitHub repositories under the old PIO organization not yet granted to the ASF. This presents you with a great opportunity to learn how software grants work. (smile) Even when

Re: 0.10.0 release

I agree with removing all reference to pio-build sbt plugin from engine templates. We will not need the "version tracking" and the pioVersion settings in engine template's sbt once we start tagging our officially tested templates. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > Awesome, all

Re: 0.10.0 release

Go to https://issues.apache.org/jira/ and log in. Find the read 'Create' button. There's a drop down menu immediately to the right of it. Open that menu, then click on 'New Git Repository'. The original request was here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12112 The second request for site

Re: 0.10.0 release

Awesome, all we need to do is push to the right repo? Can you share the links? Donald mentioned that he though we could do without the pio sbt plugin, no? On Aug 16, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Chan Lee wrote: I've changed the namespace for all repos marked "official" except for Universal Recommender a

Re: 0.10.0 release

I've changed the namespace for all repos marked "official" except for Universal Recommender and is running integration tests on them. Also, I believe the sbt plugin for pio-build needs to be updated. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > Let me know if anything is missing: https

Re: 0.10.0 release

Let me know if anything is missing: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-24 On Aug 16, 2016, at 12:26 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: +1 > On Aug 16, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Donald Szeto > wrote: > > 1) I’ll volunteer to take a couple templates and put them in their own repo

[jira] [Created] (PIO-24) move templates to apache git repos

Pat Ferrel created PIO-24: - Summary: move templates to apache git repos Key: PIO-24 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-24 Project: PredictionIO Issue Type: Task Affects Versions: 0.10

Re: 0.10.0 release

+1 > On Aug 16, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Donald Szeto wrote: > > 1) I’ll volunteer to take a couple templates and put them in their own repos > if we can get some created. > Sure. I believe Chan might have some converted repos as well. > > 2) do we have a gallery page yet? we had a good proposal,

[GitHub] incubator-predictionio pull request #269: ActionML Master merge PR, discussi...

Github user EmergentOrder commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/pull/269#discussion_r74988022 --- Diff: examples/scala-parallel-similarproduct/filterbyyear/src/main/scala/DataSource.scala --- @@ -1,28 +1,54 @@ +/* + * Li

[GitHub] incubator-predictionio issue #273: PIO-20 Merge ActionML fork

Github user pferrel commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/pull/273 inactive, this has been merged with develop --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha

[GitHub] incubator-predictionio pull request #273: PIO-20 Merge ActionML fork

Github user pferrel closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/pull/273 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if th

[GitHub] incubator-predictionio issue #269: ActionML Master merge PR, discussion only

Github user pferrel commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/pull/269 inactive PR, eveything is merged into develop branch --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do

[GitHub] incubator-predictionio pull request #269: ActionML Master merge PR, discussi...

Github user EmergentOrder commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/pull/269#discussion_r74992720 --- Diff: examples/scala-parallel-similarproduct/filterbyyear/src/main/scala/DataSource.scala --- @@ -1,28 +1,54 @@ +/* + * Li

[GitHub] incubator-predictionio pull request #269: ActionML Master merge PR, discussi...

Github user pferrel closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/pull/269 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if th

[GitHub] incubator-predictionio pull request #269: ActionML Master merge PR, discussi...

Github user EmergentOrder commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/pull/269#discussion_r74987892 --- Diff: examples/scala-parallel-similarproduct/filterbyyear/build.sbt --- @@ -7,6 +7,6 @@ name := "template-scala-parallel-similarprod

Re: 0.10.0 release

> > 1) I’ll volunteer to take a couple templates and put them in their own > repos if we can get some created. > Sure. I believe Chan might have some converted repos as well. > 2) do we have a gallery page yet? we had a good proposal, is it > implemented? > It's already been merged in develop. On

[jira] [Commented] (PIO-20) Merge ActionML fork

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15423201#comment-15423201 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PIO-20: --- Github user pferrel commented on the issue: https:

[jira] [Commented] (PIO-20) Merge ActionML fork

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15423202#comment-15423202 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PIO-20: --- Github user pferrel closed the pull request at: ht

Re: 0.10.0 release

BTW the infra Jiras to get repos created is probably critical path so can someone coach me on what to ask for? On Aug 16, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Pat Ferrel wrote: I’ve been talking abut this issue since before we were in the incubator, probably because I maintain one of the most used templates. M

Re: 0.10.0 release

I’ve been talking abut this issue since before we were in the incubator, probably because I maintain one of the most used templates. My vote is to get it right, then release otherwise we create a lot of headaches and ramifications that may never get solved. So in the do-ocracy I’ll volunteer for

Re: Why is the MaxNumberOfEventsPerBatchRequest is 50?

Thanks Donald, will create a JIRA ticket and keep you posted, Mani Teja On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > Hi Mani Teja, > > I believe this value is just a measure to avoid sending in huge batches in > a single request. I highly encourage you to make this configurable so th

Re: Spark update

Hi Marcin, This is really great work, and I agree that we should cross build against different versions of Spark. If we have a cross building infrastructure set up, we can be more flexible and adapt to different versions of external dependencies as well, such as different versions of Hadoop and El

Re: Why is the MaxNumberOfEventsPerBatchRequest is 50?

Hi Mani Teja, I believe this value is just a measure to avoid sending in huge batches in a single request. I highly encourage you to make this configurable so that other users do not need to rebuild from source should they find this value too small for their use case. Please feel free to file a J

Why is the MaxNumberOfEventsPerBatchRequest is 50?

Can anyone please help me out with this? If i change this value to a higher number, will this work? What is the reason behind fixing this value. Thanks, Mani Teja