Re: [E] Re: [PIP-78] Split the individual acknowledgments into multiple entries

2021-01-27 Thread Lin Lin
Hi Rajan, Thank you for your PR. The main difference lies in whether 10MB is enough and memory doubling problem, which is caused by different business scenarios. In some business scenario, the QPS of 20k/s is considered to be very low, and requests exceeding this order of magnitude are common. I

Re: [PIP-78] Reduce redundant producers from partitioned producer

2021-01-27 Thread Yuri Mizushima
I notice that PIP-78 has already assigned to another issue. https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/pulsar-dev/202101.mbox/%3CCAG%3DTQOrPH49v9ToDE_aeQzEiDC%2BEgSR61ERoqanpWfQGvEB_Vw%40mail.gmail.com%3E So, I'll change the PIP number to 79. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-79%3A-Reduce-r

[PIP-78] Reduce redundant producers from partitioned producer

2021-01-27 Thread Yuri Mizushima
Dear Pulsar community, When partitioned producer connects to partitioned topic, sometimes doesn't need to connect to all of partitions depending on rate, routing mode, etc. So, I drafted a PIP about reducing redundant producers from partitioned producer. I'd like to use system resources (e.g. co

Re: [Discuss] draft PIP for "Changes to flaky test handling"

2021-01-27 Thread Enrico Olivelli
I really would love to see our CI environment in good shape. Sending a PR now is very hard, most of the time is spent in /pulsar-bot run-failure-tests Thanks Lari for driving this effort Enrico Il giorno lun 25 gen 2021 alle ore 18:57 Devin Bost ha scritto: > Thanks for working on this. > > --