Re: [discuss] prometheus metrics doesn't satisfy with OpenMetrics format

2022-02-10 Thread ZhangJian He
ping @enrico @matteo ZhangJian He 于2022年2月8日周二 16:07写道: > Sorry for missing the information. > Before I upgrade the prom client, pulsar metrics is > ``` > > - pulsar_connection_closed_total_count > > - pulsar_connection_created_total_count > > - pulsar_source_received_total_1min > > - system_exc

[Discussion] keep doc repo stay in pulsar repo?

2022-02-10 Thread Yu
Hi Pulsarers, As we move forward with PIP 87 [1], we’ve migrated the Pulsar website contents to an independent repo, pulsar-site, per the agreement made by our community [2]. This migration makes us think of the doc repo. After thinking twice, our recommendation is to **keep the Pulsar doc repo a

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Pulsar-client-go 0.8.0

2022-02-10 Thread Nicolò Boschi
+1 non binding Il giorno ven 11 feb 2022 alle ore 01:03 ZhangJian He ha scritto: > +1 non binding > > Ming Luo 于2022年2月11日周五 07:39写道: > > > +1 non binding > > > > > On Feb 10, 2022, at 6:37 PM, Neng Lu wrote: > > > > > > +1 non-binding > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 6:46 PM Matteo Merli >

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Pulsar-client-go 0.8.0

2022-02-10 Thread ZhangJian He
+1 non binding Ming Luo 于2022年2月11日周五 07:39写道: > +1 non binding > > > On Feb 10, 2022, at 6:37 PM, Neng Lu wrote: > > > > +1 non-binding > > > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 6:46 PM Matteo Merli > wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Matteo Merli > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 6:44 PM r

[PR] Update .asf.yaml to protect current release branches

2022-02-10 Thread Michael Marshall
Hello, Our current apache/pulsar GitHub repo does not have protections on our current release branches. I think we should protect against deletion and force pushes, at a minimum. Here is my PR to update the .asf.yaml to comply with these rules: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14226. There i

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Pulsar-client-go 0.8.0

2022-02-10 Thread Ming Luo
+1 non binding > On Feb 10, 2022, at 6:37 PM, Neng Lu wrote: > > +1 non-binding > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 6:46 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> -- >> Matteo Merli >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 6:44 PM r...@apache.org >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Everyone: >>> >>> >>> I hope you’v

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Pulsar-client-go 0.8.0

2022-02-10 Thread Neng Lu
+1 non-binding On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 6:46 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > +1 > > > -- > Matteo Merli > > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 6:44 PM r...@apache.org > wrote: > > > > Hello Everyone: > > > > > > I hope you’ve all been doing well. In the past two months, we have > > > > fixed a number of bugs rel

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Pulsar 2.8.3

2022-02-10 Thread Neng Lu
+1 non-binding On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 1:09 AM Hang Chen wrote: > +1 > > Best, > Hang > > PengHui Li 于2022年2月10日周四 12:06写道: > > > > +1 > > > > Thank you! > > > > - Penghui > > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 3:18 AM Lari Hotari wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > Thank you, Michael, for volunteering to be t

[GitHub] [pulsar-helm-chart] mkoertgen opened a new pull request #227: Remove breaking labelmap actions, #226, #100

2022-02-10 Thread GitBox
mkoertgen opened a new pull request #227: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/227 Fixes #226 ### Motivation *Explain here the context, and why you're making that change. What is the problem you're trying to solve.* ### Modifications *Describe th

[GitHub] [pulsar-helm-chart] mkoertgen opened a new issue #226: PodMonitor: dynamic labelMap-action breaking since prom-operator 0.54

2022-02-10 Thread GitBox
mkoertgen opened a new issue #226: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/issues/226 **Describe the bug** Dynamic labelmap-action in the current podMonitor-templates causes prom-operator skipping the PodMonitor altogether. **To Reproduce** Steps to reproduce the behav

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Aloys Zhang

2022-02-10 Thread Michael Marshall
Congratulations, Aloys Zhang! - Michael On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 5:35 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Congrats! > > Enrico > > Il giorno gio 10 feb 2022 alle ore 11:55 mattison chao > ha scritto: > > > > Congratulations, Aloys Zhang > > > > Best, > > Mattison > > > > > On Feb 10, 2022, at 5:26 PM

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.2 Candidate 2

2022-02-10 Thread Nicolò Boschi
Penghui, I didn't know that there were so many known bugs around transactions scheduled for 2.9.3, my bad. However, as Enrico pointed out, the issue impacts Pulsar clients that are not using the transactions, so we can't just say - ok, just another bug about transactions, it's not critical since

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.2 Candidate 2

2022-02-10 Thread PengHui Li
> Please go ahead with the release, I won't VOTE on this thread. But I hope we can follow up soon with a new release, otherwise due to that bug you cannot enable transactions on your Pulsar cluster if you have to support Pulsar client that do not enable transactions Yes, agree. We will follow up

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Aloys Zhang

2022-02-10 Thread Yu
Congrats, Aloys Zhang! On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 7:58 PM Ruguo Yu wrote: > Congratulations, Aloys Zhang! > > Thanks > > Ruguo Yu > > > > On 2022/02/10 02:46:11 linlin wrote: > > > The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Aloys > Zhang > > > > > > (https://github.com/aloyszh

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Aloys Zhang

2022-02-10 Thread Ruguo Yu
Congratulations, Aloys Zhang! Thanks Ruguo Yu On 2022/02/10 02:46:11 linlin wrote: > The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Aloys Zhang > > (https://github.com/aloyszhang) to become a committer and we are pleased to > > announce that he has accepted. > > Al

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.2 Candidate 2

2022-02-10 Thread Lin Lin
+1(binding) 1. Checked the signature 2. Start standalone 3. Publish and consume successfully 4. Checked function

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Aloys Zhang

2022-02-10 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Congrats! Enrico Il giorno gio 10 feb 2022 alle ore 11:55 mattison chao ha scritto: > > Congratulations, Aloys Zhang > > Best, > Mattison > > > On Feb 10, 2022, at 5:26 PM, Lari Hotari wrote: > > > > Congratulations Aloys Zhang! > > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 4:46 AM linlin wrote: > > > >> T

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.2 Candidate 2

2022-02-10 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il giorno gio 10 feb 2022 alle ore 11:25 PengHui Li ha scritto: > > > wow, this is incredible, we really should slow down in cherry-picking > stuff to release branches. > But this is off-topic, as this is a VOTE thread. > > Yes, as discussed here > https://lists.apache.org/thread/b4wr2chgdrqjgjq4o

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Aloys Zhang

2022-02-10 Thread mattison chao
Congratulations, Aloys Zhang Best, Mattison > On Feb 10, 2022, at 5:26 PM, Lari Hotari wrote: > > Congratulations Aloys Zhang! > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 4:46 AM linlin wrote: > >> The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Aloys >> Zhang >> >> (https://github.com/al

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.2 Candidate 2

2022-02-10 Thread PengHui Li
> wow, this is incredible, we really should slow down in cherry-picking stuff to release branches. But this is off-topic, as this is a VOTE thread. Yes, as discussed here https://lists.apache.org/thread/b4wr2chgdrqjgjq4omf6mtfc3g2f9cnx 2.9.1 almost equals 2.9.0, 2.9.1 contains the security issue f

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Aloys Zhang

2022-02-10 Thread Lari Hotari
Congratulations Aloys Zhang! On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 4:46 AM linlin wrote: > The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Aloys > Zhang > > (https://github.com/aloyszhang) to become a committer and we are pleased > to > > announce that he has accepted. > > Aloys Zhang joined

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Aloys Zhang

2022-02-10 Thread Haiting Jiang
Congrats! Aloys Zhang Thanks, Haiting On 2022/02/10 09:10:02 Hang Chen wrote: > Congratulations, Aloys Zhang > > Best, > Hang > > PengHui Li 于2022年2月10日周四 12:14写道: > > > > Congratulations, Aloys Zhang > > > > Thanks, > > Penghui > > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:19 AM ZhangJian He wrote: >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Aloys Zhang

2022-02-10 Thread Hang Chen
Congratulations, Aloys Zhang Best, Hang PengHui Li 于2022年2月10日周四 12:14写道: > > Congratulations, Aloys Zhang > > Thanks, > Penghui > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:19 AM ZhangJian He wrote: > > > Congratulations, Aloys Zhang! > > > > Thanks > > ZhangJian He > > > > r...@apache.org 于2022年2月10日周四

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Pulsar 2.8.3

2022-02-10 Thread Hang Chen
+1 Best, Hang PengHui Li 于2022年2月10日周四 12:06写道: > > +1 > > Thank you! > > - Penghui > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 3:18 AM Lari Hotari wrote: > > > +1 > > Thank you, Michael, for volunteering to be the release manager for 2.8.3. > > > > -Lari > > > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 8:16 PM Michael Marshall

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.2 Candidate 2

2022-02-10 Thread Hang Chen
Hi Enrico, In my opinion, the transactions is still in developing state and not stable yet. For those critical bug fixes, we'd better prepare 2.9.3 release earlier instead of blocking the current 2.9.2 release. Otherwise, if we make new release candidate for any new find bugs, It will be a hug

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.2 Candidate 2

2022-02-10 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il giorno gio 10 feb 2022 alle ore 08:39 PengHui Li ha scritto: > > Enrico, > > There are 40 closed PRs > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pulls?q=is%3Apr+label%3Arelease%2F2.9.3+is%3Aclosed > and most of them cherry-picked to branch-2.9, so you mean the 2.9.2 wow, this is incredible, we really s