Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.3 Candidate 2

2022-07-13 Thread Michael Marshall
+1 (non-binding) - Verified signatures for all 48 artifacts - Verified sha512 checksums for all 48 artifacts - Verified rat check by running mvn apache-rat:check - Compiled from sources using JDK 11 and running mvn clean install -DskipTests - Inspected docker image mattison/pulsar:2.9.3-rc-2

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-184: Cluster migration or Blue-Green cluster deployment support in Pulsar

2022-07-13 Thread Rajan Dhabalia
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 10:57 AM Joe F wrote: > Hi Rajan, > > > > > For consumers, the message will be sent when there are no more messages > > to > > > read? > > > > > Yes. > > > I think it would be helpful to add a bit more detail on the consumer > switch (sp. Shared consumers). There is a

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.3 Candidate 2

2022-07-13 Thread guo jiwei
+1 (non-binding) - Download links are valid. - Checksums and signatures. - LICENSE/NOTICE/exist - Rat check passes - Compile source with JDK11 - Run standalone, and run pulsar produce/consume Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:24 PM Hang Chen wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitHub Discussion for user-facing discussion

2022-07-13 Thread Max Xu
+1 Best, Max Xu On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 10:17 AM Michael Marshall wrote: > +1 > > - Michael > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:05 AM Zixuan Liu wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Zixuan > > > > PengHui Li 于2022年7月13日周三 23:58写道: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Penghui > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:44

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-181: Pulsar Shell

2022-07-13 Thread Max Xu
Hi Nicolò, This is definitely a very awesome job, thank you for bringing Pulsar Shell to us! Also, I was wondering if we could integrate the pulsar shell entrypoint directly into the existing pulsar command[1]? (i.e, invoke ./bin/pulsar shell) So that we can reuse the current CLI instead of

[GitHub] [pulsar-helm-chart] michaeljmarshall merged pull request #276: scripts: provide an error if the namespace was not created

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
michaeljmarshall merged PR #276: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/276 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitHub Discussion for user-facing discussion

2022-07-13 Thread Michael Marshall
+1 - Michael On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:05 AM Zixuan Liu wrote: > > +1 > > Zixuan > > PengHui Li 于2022年7月13日周三 23:58写道: > > > +1 > > > > Penghui > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:44 PM Anon Hxy wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > tison 于2022年7月12日周二 18:01写道: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > In

[GitHub] [pulsar-helm-chart] pgier opened a new pull request, #276: scripts: provide an error if the namespace was not created

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
pgier opened a new pull request, #276: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/276 This is just a minor improvement to the error handling of one of the bash scripts ### Motivation Currently if you run `./scripts/pulsar/prepare_helm_release.sh` and the pulsar

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-184: Cluster migration or Blue-Green cluster deployment support in Pulsar

2022-07-13 Thread Joe F
Hi Rajan, > > > For consumers, the message will be sent when there are no more messages > to > > read? > > > Yes. I think it would be helpful to add a bit more detail on the consumer switch (sp. Shared consumers). There is a window of transition where "dispatched-but-not-acked messages" might

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-184: Cluster migration or Blue-Green cluster deployment support in Pulsar

2022-07-13 Thread Rajan Dhabalia
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 2:30 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Very interesting. Overall I support this proposal > > A couple of questions: > - What about monitoring the status of the migration? > There will be a cluster level state. Once all topics are migrated and deleted, the broker will change

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-184: Cluster migration or Blue-Green cluster deployment support in Pulsar

2022-07-13 Thread Rajan Dhabalia
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 1:55 AM Asaf Mesika wrote: > Few questions > > "CompletableFuture asyncMigrate();" > Does this method only change the status of the managed ledger? > No, as it's mentioned in PIP: this API will terminate the topic so, it will not allow any new write and producers on that

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitHub Discussion for user-facing discussion

2022-07-13 Thread PengHui Li
+1 Penghui On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:44 PM Anon Hxy wrote: > +1 > > tison 于2022年7月12日周二 18:01写道: > > > Hi, > > > > In the previous email[1] I started a discussion about enabling GitHub > > Discussions in apache/pulsar repository and we meet a consensus to avoid > > making development

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitHub Discussion for user-facing discussion

2022-07-13 Thread Anon Hxy
+1 tison 于2022年7月12日周二 18:01写道: > Hi, > > In the previous email[1] I started a discussion about enabling GitHub > Discussions in apache/pulsar repository and we meet a consensus to avoid > making development discussions truth happen on the sources. It's also a > requirement of INFRA team[2] > >

Re: Batch Messages with only 1 message

2022-07-13 Thread Anon Hxy
Hi Matteo > Brokers are never going to look into batches, they will just check at the batch header, without decompression, and not dig into the individual messages properties I agree with this. The PIP-105 doesn't support batch send I think. PIP-105 maybe is not a good case for this changing.

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitHub Discussion for user-facing discussion

2022-07-13 Thread Matteo Merli
+1 -- Matteo Merli On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 7:58 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > > +1 - thanks. > > Emails will go to dev@pulsar initially. We should have a separate discussion > about notifications since these are set on a repository by repository basis. > > > On Jul 12, 2022, at 4:04 AM, Yu wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.3 Candidate 2

2022-07-13 Thread Hang Chen
+1 (binding) - Checked the checksum and license - Build from source code with JDK 11 - Run standalone, and run pulsar-perf produce/consume - Verified pulsar-io-lakehouse connector Thanks, Hang PengHui Li 于2022年7月8日周五 23:01写道: > > +1 binding > > - checked the signature > - run standalone and

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitHub Discussion for user-facing discussion

2022-07-13 Thread Dave Fisher
+1 - thanks. Emails will go to dev@pulsar initially. We should have a separate discussion about notifications since these are set on a repository by repository basis. > On Jul 12, 2022, at 4:04 AM, Yu wrote: > > Hi tison, thanks for creating this vote! > I thought we reached a lay consensus

[GitHub] [pulsar-site] tisonkun opened a new issue, #146: Provide structural client overview page

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
tisonkun opened a new issue, #146: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/issues/146 Currently, Pulsar provides a [Client Libraries](https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/next/client-libraries) page to show official and third party client libraries. While it's a good entry point for

Re: Tool to calculate accurate backlog of a subscription (considering batching and entry filters)

2022-07-13 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il giorno mer 13 lug 2022 alle ore 04:05 PengHui Li ha scritto: > > Oh, I see. > > I think we can start with a proposal? I saw the new REST API introduced in > the PR. > It's better to follow the proposal process to get explicit approvals. Sure. I started this conversation to understand if

[GitHub] [pulsar-site] visortelle commented on issue #96: Algolia search doesn't work

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
visortelle commented on issue #96: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/issues/96#issuecomment-1182998164 @tisonkun not completely. It's great that the search spotlight works now! But in case I click "Search all results", it shows me a forever spinner.

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-184: Cluster migration or Blue-Green cluster deployment support in Pulsar

2022-07-13 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Very interesting. Overall I support this proposal A couple of questions: - What about monitoring the status of the migration? - Should we block all maintenance operations on the "blue" cluster ? like deleting/creating stuff - Should we stop ledger trimming and offloading ? - What about

[GitHub] [pulsar-site] tisonkun commented on issue #96: Algolia search doesn't work

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
tisonkun commented on issue #96: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/issues/96#issuecomment-1182960395 It seems the search bar can show results now. Could you check if the issue resolved? cc @visortelle -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-184: Cluster migration or Blue-Green cluster deployment support in Pulsar

2022-07-13 Thread Asaf Mesika
Few questions "CompletableFuture asyncMigrate();" Does this method only change the status of the managed ledger? "message ManagedLedgerInfo { // Flag to check if topic is terminated and migrated to different cluster optional bool migrated = 4; }" This flag then is only changed to true

[DISCUSS] PIP-186: Introduce two phase deletion protocol based on system topic

2022-07-13 Thread horizonzy
Hi Pulsar community: I open a pip to discuss "Introduce two phase deletion protocol based on system topic" Proposal Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16569 --- ## Motivation Original issue: #13238 In current ledger deletion, we divided it into two separate steps. It happens in

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitHub Discussion for user-facing discussion

2022-07-13 Thread Zike Yang
+1 On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 3:21 PM tison wrote: > > Thanks for your feedback. To be clear, I'll conclude the result after 72 > hours from the first email sent if there's no objections. > > Best, > tison. > > > Qiang Huang 于2022年7月13日周三 14:10写道: > > > +1 > > > > guo jiwei 于2022年7月13日周三 10:11写道:

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitHub Discussion for user-facing discussion

2022-07-13 Thread tison
Thanks for your feedback. To be clear, I'll conclude the result after 72 hours from the first email sent if there's no objections. Best, tison. Qiang Huang 于2022年7月13日周三 14:10写道: > +1 > > guo jiwei 于2022年7月13日周三 10:11写道: > > > +1 > > > > > > Regards > > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > > > > On Tue,

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitHub Discussion for user-facing discussion

2022-07-13 Thread Qiang Huang
+1 guo jiwei 于2022年7月13日周三 10:11写道: > +1 > > > Regards > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:53 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > Enrico > > > > Il giorno mar 12 lug 2022 alle ore 13:05 Yu ha > scritto: > > > > > > Hi tison, thanks for creating this vote! > > > I