+1(non-binding)
Best,
Mattison
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 13:19, guo jiwei wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:54 AM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Penghui
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:15 AM Zike Yang wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
+1
Best,
Mattison
On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 at 14:51, Haiting Jiang wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Haiting
>
> On 2022/07/23 02:00:32 PengHui Li wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Penghui
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 9:41 PM Asaf Mesika wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry to barge in the vote - I forgot to send my reply on
+1
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:54 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> +1
>
> Penghui
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:15 AM Zike Yang wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 3:58 PM Dave Maughan
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Pulsar Community
> > >
> > > I
+1(non-binding)
Best,
Mattison
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 10:35, Haiting Jiang wrote:
>
> +1
> Thanks,
> Haiting
>
> On 2022/07/25 02:23:20 Anon Hxy wrote:
> > Dear Community,
> >
> > I would like to start a VOTE on "PIP-189: No batching if only one message
> > in batch."
> >
> > The proposal can
Hi Lari,
> The "CI - Integration - Cli / cli" build job passes cleanly for 2.7.4 . This
> means that it's very likely that there's a regression in 2.7.5 . I'll
> investigate the issue.
Any progress on this?
Thanks,
Haiting
On 2022/02/16 10:54:14 Lari Hotari wrote:
> I'll vote again with -1.
+1
Thanks,
Haiting
On 2022/07/25 02:23:20 Anon Hxy wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> I would like to start a VOTE on "PIP-189: No batching if only one message
> in batch."
>
> The proposal can be read at [0] and the discussion thread is available at
> [1] and the PR link is available at [2]
>
>
Closing this vote with 3 +1s and no -1s:
+1s:
* Matteo
* PengHui
* Dave
Thanks,
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 7:58 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Sorry I’m late to this discussion.
>
> I think that the motivation is correct. There is really quite a bit of
> activity around
Hi Enrico,
> We should also one last release out of 2.7 branch.
> I hope that someone will volunteer
I volunteer to be the release manager for 2.7.5.
I will start the discuss mail shortly.
Thanks,
Haiting
On 2022/07/21 16:56:50 Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Thank you Yunze
>
> I agree that it is
Dear Community,
I would like to start a VOTE on "PIP-189: No batching if only one message
in batch."
The proposal can be read at [0] and the discussion thread is available at
[1] and the PR link is available at [2]
Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
[0]
Hello Pulsar Community,
I would like to open a discussion here about PIP-195 : New bucket based
delayed message tracker. I look forward to your feedback.
PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16763
Thanks,
Cong Zhao
Thanks for your work!
Best,
Mattison
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 at 11:34, Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> Sure, I will take it carefully for those PRs not cherry-picked to branch-2.8
> but labeled
> as `release/2.8.4`.
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
>
>
>
> > 2022年7月22日 00:09，Dave Fisher 写道：
> >
> > Thank you for
Thanks for the feedback Asaf
> >- preprocess-function: the preprocess function applied before the
> >Sink. Starts by builtin:// for built-in functions, function:// for
> >package function, http:// or file://
> >
> > 1. While this function is applied only before sink? I thought it
Thanks for your comments Baodi
> This proposal looks good to me.
>
> > Only Functions returning a Record will be authorized to ensure that the
> Function sets the Schema explicitly.
>
> Does this mean that the function return type is fixed Record?
Yes
> Can the interface declaration of the
Hi Pulsar community:
I open a pip to discuss "Pulsar client: seek command add epoch"
Proposal Link:
- issue link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16757
--
## Motivation
`Reader` belongs to exclusive subscription type, and it uses `nonDurable`
cursor. After receiving messages, `Reader`
There is an example maybe helpful to understand the properties extraction:
- Let's set `batchedFilterProperties`=``
This means only key named `region` and `version`will be extracted to the
batch meta properties
- Then we have a producer that sends the messges below in order:
- `msg1` with
If I understand correctly, using tags, you can automatically create the
docs for the next minor version?
So for older minor versions, where those files will be at? using tags from
git?
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 7:04 AM Ma Jun wrote:
> Hi, Pulsar community,
>
> Happy weekend!
>
> I'd like to open
Hi,
Few questions:
>- preprocess-function: the preprocess function applied before the
>Sink. Starts by builtin:// for built-in functions, function:// for
>package function, http:// or file://
>
> 1. While this function is applied only before sink? I thought it replaces
the identity
Fantastic initiative.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:59 PM Nicolò Boschi wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> Here's a report of the flaky tests in Pulsar CI during the observation
> period of 2022-07-12 - 2022-07-19
>
>
>
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:36 AM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Il giorno gio 21 lug 2022 alle ore 06:25 PengHui Li
> ha scritto:
> >
> > > What if the topic owner creates an internal subscription, consumes the
> > messages, and updates a count per filter.
> >
> > I agree with this approach. If we
Hi Asaf,
> (the field is not generic,
> it's specifically named shadow_message_id).
As Penghui suggested, this field name is changed to `message_id` for
potential generic usage. :)
> The second problem is clients: Every such field will eventually trickle
> down to the clients, which will need
+1
Thanks,
Haiting
On 2022/07/23 02:00:32 PengHui Li wrote:
> +1
>
> Penghui
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 9:41 PM Asaf Mesika wrote:
>
> > Sorry to barge in the vote - I forgot to send my reply on the discussion 2
> > days ago :)
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 11:22 PM Nicolò Boschi
> >
21 matches
Mail list logo
