GitHub user momo-jun edited a comment on the discussion: [Design] Pulsar All
Releases Page
@Anonymitaet FYI - The [release blog for
2.10.0](https://pulsar.apache.org/blog/2022/05/11/whats-new-in-pulsar-210) is
in place but has not been shown on this new page yet.
GitHub link:
https://github
GitHub user momo-jun added a comment to the discussion: [Design] Pulsar All
Releases Page
@Anonymitaet FYI - The [release blog for
2.10.0](https://pulsar.apache.org/blog/2022/05/11/whats-new-in-pulsar-210) is
in place but not shown on this new page.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/pu
GitHub user BewareMyPower added a comment to the discussion: Python 3.6 client
for aarch64/arm64 Linux?
You need to confirm which Boost.Python library did you link when you compiled
the Python client.
See
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-python/blob/d14aada9fc418c99f4be58f58289d1b884b
GitHub user startjava added a comment to the discussion: what time merge about
this version ?
@liangyuanpeng use which version test ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/17978#discussioncomment-3845454
This is an automatically sent email for dev@pulsar.apache.org.
GitHub user startjava added a comment to the discussion: what time merge about
this version ?
use bottom code print info :
```
@RequestMapping("getUnAckMsgCount")
public String getUnAckMsgCount() throws PulsarClientException,
PulsarAdminException {
{
List consumers
GitHub user startjava added a comment to the discussion: what time merge about
this version ?
```
package com.ghy.www.cumulativeacknowledgement.consumer.listener;
import org.apache.pulsar.client.api.Consumer;
import org.apache.pulsar.client.api.Message;
import org.apache.pulsar.client.api.Me
GitHub user liangyuanpeng added a comment to the discussion: what time merge
about this version ?
Change `consumer.acknowledgeCumulative(msg);` to `
consumer.acknowledge(msg); ` also get what you want.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/17978#discussion
+100 thank you!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 10, 2022, at 9:03 PM, GitBox wrote:
>
>
> Anonymitaet commented on code in PR #17990:
> URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17990#discussion_r991793640
>
>
> ##
> wiki/release/release-process.md:
> ##
> @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@
GitHub user liangyuanpeng added a comment to the discussion: what time merge
about this version ?
You can try to do not ack message and get the getUnackedMessages .
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/17978#discussioncomment-3844734
This is an automatically sent em
GitHub user liangyuanpeng added a comment to the discussion: what time merge
about this version ?
This API is working for 2.10.1, you can use it on now.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/17978#discussioncomment-3844714
This is an automatically sent email for dev@
GitHub user startjava added a comment to the discussion: what time merge about
this version ?
thank you ! very much ! i wait future version test this api .
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/17978#discussioncomment-3844343
This is an automatically sent email for d
GitHub user liangyuanpeng added a comment to the discussion: what time merge
about this version ?
M1-M5 would be acked when you acknowledgeCumulative M5 , that is the reason
of you got the unackmessages is 0.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/17978#discussioncomment
GitHub user startjava added a comment to the discussion: what time merge about
this version ?
@liangyuanpeng current version 2.10.1 getUnackedMessages() method
availability??
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/17978#discussioncomment-3844041
This is an automati
I would prefer that we avoid using the term “breaking changes”, which is
too vague to convey any specific meaning. So let me try to bring some
clarity.
There have been many changes to implementations, APIs and data storage
formats in Pulsar (and book keeper also). I have deployed many of these
ch
Hi Yu,
Thank you for the explanation!
Yunze
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 2:09 PM Yu wrote:
>
> Hi Yunze,
>
> Thanks for your feedback!
>
> We (@SignorMercurio, @urfreespace) are implementing the idea of "Pulsar
> release page automation" [1] and updating the workflow [2].
>
> I'll move the workflow
Rajan,
Perhaps you missed this reply which lists one area of potential improvement.
What are your thoughts about this type of client issue? Do you have an approach
where this is not an issue for you?
Thanks,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 7, 2022, at 6:42 PM, Lari Hotari wrote:
>
> Than
16 matches
Mail list logo
