I agree with Enrico that it's better to have a config option.
Also, we cannot simply replace the PulsarVersion call with the
DynamicPulsarVersion call because the client version string is now
constructed as:
String.format("Pulsar-Java-v%s", PulsarVersion.getVersion())
It's a config of client
This is the third release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version 2.10.4.
This release contains 99 commits by 34 contributors.
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/compare/v2.10.3...v2.10.4-candidate-1
*** Please download, test, and vote on this release. This vote will stay
open
for at least 72 hours
Yunze,
Il Ven 3 Mar 2023, 12:31 Yunze Xu ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> Based on the previous discussion [1], I created a proposal to support
> configuring client version at SDK level:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19705
>
> I've added more explanations in the motivation part, let's use
I too am excited for the 0.10.0 release - thank you for driving this!
-Frank Kelly
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 10:07 PM Zike Yang wrote:
> Hi, Baodi, Yunze
>
> Thanks. Sure, I will wait for them.
>
> BR,
> Zike Yang
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 9:02 PM Yunze Xu
> wrote:
> >
> > Please wait for a
Hi all,
Based on the previous discussion [1], I created a proposal to support
configuring client version at SDK level:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19705
I've added more explanations in the motivation part, let's use this
PIP as a subsequent discussion of [1].
BTW, there is a PR [2]
Hi all,
We only use the BC to encrypt the message, not TLS, so I think we can
migrate to the BC-FIPS.
If you think it's feasible, I'll try to do it, and if it doesn't pass the
Pulsar test, I'll keep using the BC.
Thanks,
Zixuan
YuWei Sung 于2023年3月2日周四 00:40写道：
> BC and BC-FIPS differences
This is an interesting discussion.
Good to see this kind of a discussion on the dev@ mailing list, this
way more people are aware of the fact that we are a project in the ASF
and there is a Project Management Committee.
I have been following a few Apache projects for a while, and I believe
that
+1 Looks great!
Thanks,
Cong
On 2023/02/17 22:44:34 Matteo Merli wrote:
> Since the LTS release model has been formally approved, I'm proposing
> the following schedule for the release:
>
> * Tue - 2023-05-11
>- RC-1
>- Code Freeze -- Only critical fixes will be merged in the
