Hi.
Pulsar api provides MessageId interface which is generally used by producer
and consumer applications to manage topic offset. Sometimes, these
applications would like to serialize and deserialize messageIds,
specifically consumer app which would like to persist messageId and ack
with those me
> So you say in that sentence that you will add the topic name into
MessageIdData. MessageIdData is defined in PulsarApi.proto and is
transferred over the wire, so how can you add the topic to this class
without changing the wire protocol?
Yes, the client creates a separate MessageId while creating
+1 (binding)
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 9:00 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno lun 19 giu 2023 alle ore 14:48 Asaf Mesika
> ha scritto:
> >
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 9:19 AM 丛搏 wrote:
> >
> > > +1(binding)
> >
Hi community:
After configuring the geo-replication on Pulsar clusters, the `clusters
list` API will return multiple clusters, including the local Pulsar cluster
and remote clusters like
```
bin/pulsar-admin clusters list
us-west
us-east
us-cent
```
But in this return, you can't distinguish th
+1(binding)
Best,
Mattison
On 20 Jun 2023 at 10:45 +0800, PengHui Li , wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Penghui
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:40 AM Yubiao Feng
> wrote:
>
> > Voting +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks
> > Yubiao Feng
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 5:21 PM Asaf Mesika wrote:
> >
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Penghui
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:40 AM Yubiao Feng
wrote:
> Voting +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks
> Yubiao Feng
>
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 5:21 PM Asaf Mesika wrote:
>
> > Voting +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:23 PM guo jiwei wrote:
> >
> > > @Asaf Th
Voting +1 (non-binding)
Thanks
Yubiao Feng
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 5:21 PM Asaf Mesika wrote:
> Voting +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:23 PM guo jiwei wrote:
>
> > @Asaf Thanks, I have addressed the comment.
> >
> > Regards
> > Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023
+1 (binding)
Enrico
Il giorno lun 19 giu 2023 alle ore 14:48 Asaf Mesika
ha scritto:
>
> +1 (non binding)
>
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 9:19 AM 丛搏 wrote:
>
> > +1(binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bo
> >
> > houxiaoyu 于2023年6月19日周一 14:04写道：
> > >
> > > Hi, community:
> > >
> > > This thread is to sta
I want to add only one step to your plan.
If you introduce this flag in Y.X, then in Y.(X+1), let's remove this flag
and keep the "true" value as the behavior.
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 4:57 AM horizonzy wrote:
> Background
>
> In the Pulsar, it has two features:
>
>-
>
>The first feature
+1 (non binding)
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 9:19 AM 丛搏 wrote:
> +1(binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Bo
>
> houxiaoyu 于2023年6月19日周一 14:04写道：
> >
> > Hi, community:
> >
> > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-275: Introduce
> > topicOrderedExecutorThreadNum to deprecate
> > numWorkerThreadsForNonPersistent
First, let me add some data that should be added to the Background section
of the PIP since I had to reverse engineer the code to understand that,
which is the opposite of the goal of a design document.
Pulsar Broker has a binary protocol, which allows the client to consume
messages, acknowle
Voting +1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:23 PM guo jiwei wrote:
> @Asaf Thanks, I have addressed the comment.
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:55 AM Asaf Mesika wrote:
>
> > -1 (non-binding)
> >
> > I'm perfectly ok with the idea; just please fix the docu
FYI - the proposal is applied https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24636.
On 2023/06/02 02:25:55 Dave Fisher wrote:
> I think that INFRA would accept a DISCUSSION that looks for LAZY CONSENSUS.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jun 1, 2023, at 7:18 PM, tison wrote:
> >
> > While we can
13 matches
Mail list logo
