May I make a proposal : adding `remote` flag also?
#Concern : It seems like we are sort of allowing users to assume what the
ones without `local` flag are (are called by the community).
#Possible Benfit : Users will benefit from not having to think about what `
non-local` clusters are called.
Hi Cong,
I have left some comments on the GH PR.
PTAL
Thanks,
Penghui
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 9:12 AM Cong Zhao wrote:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
> I am writing to start the discussion on PIP 278 to support pluggable
> compaction service
>
> PR with PIP contents:
> >> Main reasons are performance (you will see improvement due to http
overhead compare to tcp, limited threads on http-server side and definitely
performance compare to netty-tcp vs http-jetty server), user feasibility
(same reason why we have producer/consumer stats using binary protocol
where
