Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 2.11.2 release

2023-07-09 Thread guo jiwei
Thanks. I will start the release this week Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 11:24 AM Hang Chen wrote: > +1 > > Apache Pulsar 2.11.x uses BookKeeper 4.15.x, which is no release plan yet. > BookKeeper is releasing 4.14.8, which will be used Pulsar 2.9.x and 2.10.x > > Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client Go Release 0.11.0 Candidate 1

2023-07-09 Thread Rui Fu
+1 - verified checksum and signature - run producer and consumer examples Best, Rui Fu On Jul 4, 2023 at 17:22 +0800, Zike Yang , wrote: > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version > 0.11.0, as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 2.11.2 release

2023-07-09 Thread Hang Chen
+1 Apache Pulsar 2.11.x uses BookKeeper 4.15.x, which is no release plan yet. BookKeeper is releasing 4.14.8, which will be used Pulsar 2.9.x and 2.10.x Thanks, Hang PengHui Li 于2023年7月5日周三 07:54写道： > > Hi Enrico, > > Which BK release do we want to wait? I noticed that the BookKeeper community

Re: [GitHub] [pulsar] BewareMyPower commented on pull request #20759: [Revert][Build] Ubuntu 22.04 was not compatible with Python Client Wheel

2023-07-09 Thread Dave Fisher
I’m AFK, but that is the issue with the 2.11 deploy script. It both builds the 3.8 wheel using an old docker image and then installs that Python/c++ client. I would support the next versions of 2.10 and 2.11 installing the latest at that time of the Python/c++ client. Let’s just be explicit and

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client Go Release 0.11.0 Candidate 1

2023-07-09 Thread guo jiwei
+1 (binding) - Download the source code - Checked the signature - Build from the source code - Run the test locally Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 9:00 AM PengHui Li wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Download the source code > - Checked the signature > - Build from the source

Re: [DISCUSS] Consistent code style (esp. ws/indent) and autotools

2023-07-09 Thread PengHui Li
My concern is how much value it will add. >From my experience, it's fine. The code style is not consistent but doesn't affect my code reading and writing much. But it might introduce risks and we need to pay much effort to the code review. Regards, Penghui On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 7:39 PM tison

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Node.js Client Release 1.9.0 Candidate 1

2023-07-09 Thread PengHui Li
+1(binding) - Install from npm - Run the produce and consume example [1] Regards, Penghui [1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/tree/v1.9.0-rc.1#getting-started On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 7:32 PM Yunze Xu wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Verified checksum and signature > - Build from

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client Go Release 0.11.0 Candidate 1

2023-07-09 Thread PengHui Li
+1 (binding) - Download the source code - Checked the signature - Build from the source code - Run the test locally Regards, Penghui On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 5:22 PM Zike Yang wrote: > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version > 0.11.0, as follows: > [ ]

Re: [VOTE] PIP-280 : Refactor CLI Argument Parsing Logic for Measurement Units using JCommander's custom converter

2023-07-09 Thread Zili Chen
+1 (non-binding) On 2023/07/07 09:25:22 Joo Hyuk Kim wrote: > Hi community, > > This PIP has received a couple of approvals in github PR link [1] > So I thought it's time to vote. > > ## Motivation > > In the current Pulsar codebase, the logic to parse CLI arguments for > measurement units

Re: [DISCUSS] Cherry-pick PR-16059 to 2.10 to prevent infinite unloading

2023-07-09 Thread PengHui Li
Hi Heesung, For 2.10, I would like to suggest fixing the issue instead of cherry-picking the PR. The problem that https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/388 had resolved will happen again if `loadBalancerDistributeBundlesEvenlyEnabled` is disabled. We should try to remove the configuration in the