Re: [DISCUSS] Support key filter for Table View

I've extended the interface to allow filtering by key and value. Thanks Mattison On 18 Jul 2023 at 09:50 +0800, mattisonc...@gmail.com, wrote: > > Hi, Folks > > I would like to follow the PIP process to start the discussion of PIP-283. > > Please don't hesitate to leave your concern and suggestion

[DISCUSS] PIP-284 Refactor SystemTopicBasedTopicPoliciesService by TableView

Hi, Folks I would like to follow the PIP process to start the discussion of PIP-284[1]. Please don't hesitate to leave your concern and suggestions. Best, Mattison [1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20828

Re: [DISCUSS] Support key filter for Table View

Sorry, I wrote this email through another application. It seems the link does not support well in the apache pony mail. I'll put the link over here. PIP-283: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20827 Best, Mattison On 18 Jul 2023 at 09:50 +0800, mattisonc...@gmail.com, wrote: > > Hi, Folks >

[DISCUSS] Support key filter for Table View

Hi, Folks I would like to follow the PIP process to start the discussion of PIP-283. Please don't hesitate to leave your concern and suggestions. Best, Mattison

[DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 3.1.0 release

Hi community, It has been more than 2 months since releasing 3.0.x. We now have more than 330 commits, including new PIP-255, PIP-275, and PIP-278, and fixing too many bugs and improvements. As mentioned in PIP-175 , feature releases every 3 mon

Re: [DISCUSS] Provide consistent concept around partitioned topic and topic partition/internal topic

I just treat the partitioned topic as a set of named non-partitioned topics. Pulsar doesn't really have any partitioned definition. So the non-partitioned topics would be the partition of the partitioned topic. I think the real confusion is that we can create the non-partitioned topic independentl

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-281: Add notifyError method on PushSource

Thanks for the PIP. Looks good to me +1 (non-binding) Zike Yang On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 9:05 AM PengHui Li wrote: > > Thanks, > > It looks good to me. > > Regards, > Penghui > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 8:18 PM Baodi Shi wrote: > > > Hi, Penghui. > > > > Could you please help add a section to ex

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 3.0.1 Candidate 1

Hi, Yunze, Thanks for your finding! > We should not make breaking public API changes by saying they are so-called bug fixes. If the bug cannot be fixed without introducing any new API, just add them instead of modifying existing APIs. I agree that we shouldn't introduce public API changes to th